Feds Win Discovery Fight in ADA Case Over NJ Preschool's Toilet-Training Policy
A federal judge has ordered the owners of a private preschool to comply with a broad request for discovery about its diaper-changing policies in a lawsuit claiming the school violated the civil rights of a young girl with Down syndrome by expelling her.
December 20, 2018 at 05:51 PM
3 minute read
A federal judge has ordered the owners of a private preschool to comply with a broad request for discovery about its diaper-changing policies in a lawsuit claiming the school violated the civil rights of a young girl with Down syndrome by expelling her.
U.S. District Judge Noel Hillman of the District of New Jersey issued his order in U.S. v. Nobel Learning Communities on Dec. 19.
Defendant Nobel operates various preschools around the country, including the Chesterbrook Academy in Moorestown, which is the focus of the lawsuit.
The school is accused of violating the rights of the girl, identified by the court only as M.M., when it expelled her after she failed to become toilet trained shortly before she turned 4.
M.M., now 7, enrolled at Chesterbrook in January 2012, and her parents were alerted in December 2014 that she would be moved the next month to an “intermediates” class in which diaper-changing services were no longer provided, according to Hillman.
Chesterbrook told the parents about the deadline and worked to toilet train M.M., but expelled her in April 2015 when that training failed, the decision said.
The civil lawsuit, alleging discrimination in violation of the Americans With Disabilities Act, was filed in 2017 on behalf of the parents by the U.S. Attorney's Office for the District of New Jersey. The lawsuit alleges M.M. was expelled because of her disability, and not because she had failed to become toilet trained.
In the Dec. 19 decision, Hillman sided with the government in a dispute between the parties over a discovery request demanding details of the company's toilet-training policies nationwide, going back five years.
Nobel had contended that there was no memorialized nationwide policy and that the Moorestown school's policy was based solely on a local guideline. Nobel had argued that discovery should only be required for the previous two years and be confined to the Moorestown school's guidelines only.
Hillman's order affirmed an April 2018 ruling by U.S. Magistrate Judge Joel Schneider.
“Defendant has stated it has a general, national practice concerning toilet training,” Hillman said. “This practice is not reduced to writing, but is only evidenced by actions concerning specific children.
“Discovery related to that practice is immediately relevant and Judge Schneider was correct in ordering it,” Hillman said.
There was no evidence, Hillman said, that Schneider overstepped his authority when he granted the broad discovery request.
The lawsuit seeks a declaration that Nobel violated Title III of the ADA, an injunction barring the company from engaging in further discrimination, compensatory relief for the parents, and a civil penalty. The lawsuit was filed in January 2017.
A spokesman for the U.S. Attorney's Office declined to comment on Hillman's ruling. The government and the family are being represented by Assistant U.S. Attorney Jordan Anger.
Nobel's attorney, Bonnie Hoffman, of the Philadelphia office of Hangley Aronchick Segal Pudlin & Schiller, did not return a call seeking comment.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllVirtua Drug Tests Pregnancy Patients Without Consent, NJ Attorney General Alleges in New Suit
3 minute read'Bewitched by the Technology': $300K to Settle Faulty Facial Recognition
4 minute readDOJ, New Jersey Judiciary Settle Over Language Access Discrimination Allegations, Retaliation Against Court Employee
3 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Eagle Pharma Founder Sues Company to Recoup Cost of SEC Investigation
- 2GC Conference Takeaways: Picking AI Vendors 'a Bit of a Crap Shoot,' Beware of Internal Investigation 'Scope Creep'
- 3Legal Events for Georgia Lawyers
- 4'There is No Time to Waste': Matt Gaetz Withdraws From AG Nomination
- 5The Growing PFAS Morass: Why Insurance Should Cover These Products Liability Claims
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250