NJSBA weighs in on fee-shifting provisions in retainer agreements
The New Jersey State Bar Association is challenging a published appellate court decision imposing new requirements on attorneys when entering into retainer agreements in fee-shifting cases. In Balducci v. Cige, Docket No. A-3068-16T2, the NJSBA filed an amicus brief urging the Supreme Court to grant certification and reverse the Appellate Division’s decision, which, according to the association, amounted to improper rulemaking.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.
For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]
