Surgical Center Faces Lawsuits After Former Patients Urged to Get Tested
Two suits were filed in late December against HealthPlus Surgery Center, and a third was expected this week after state inspectors reported lapses in sanitation at the facility.
January 03, 2019 at 12:53 PM
5 minute read
Lawsuits against a Saddle Brook outpatient surgery center are multiplying after thousands of its former patients were instructed to undergo testing for HIV and hepatitis.
Two suits were filed in late December against the HealthPlus Surgery Center, and a third suit was expected on Jan. 2. Filed in Bergen County Superior Court, the lawsuits come after state inspectors reported major lapses in sanitation at the facility.
State inspectors found that surgical instruments at the facility had debris in the hinges, were rusty and discolored and that surgical staff failed to cover up their facial hair while operations were being conducted, according to their report.
The state Department of Health shut down HealthPlus on Sept. 7 after an inspection revealed poor drug storage methods, an outdated infection control plan and unacceptable sterilization practices. The facility was allowed to reopen on Sept. 28.
And on Dec. 17, HealthPlus sent letters to 3,778 people instructing them to have blood tests for hepatitis B, hepatitis C and HIV. Those individuals were treated at the center between Jan. 1, 2018, and Sept. 7.
Michael Maggiano of Maggiano, DiGirolamo & Lizzi in Fort Lee filed suit on Dec. 28 on behalf of a potential class of people who underwent treatment at the center, and their spouses. The plaintiffs in his suit are Lauren Marrero, a former HealthPlus patient, and her husband, Julio Marrero. The suit brings claims of negligence, and a count for loss of society, consortium, companionship and services.
Maggiano said he's hearing “devastating accounts” of the impact the potential infection is having on the lives of class members. One such person, who works in food service, told Maggiano's office that she was thinking of suicide. Maggiano said he arranged to have her evaluated by doctors. Another plaintiff said she's been shunning her husband's kisses since he received the letter instructing him to get tested.
Michael Epstein of the Epstein Law Firm in Rochelle Park filed suit on Dec. 31 on behalf of a former patient identified by her initials, C.S. His suit brings claims on behalf of four subclasses: Former patients who were treated at the facility and contracted a disease or infection, former patients who did not contract a disease or infection, a spouse or intimate partner of a former patient of the HealthPlus Surgery Center who contracted a disease or infection as a result, and a spouse or intimate partner who did not contact any disease or infection.
Brooklyn attorney Sanford Rubenstein said he expects to file suit in Bergen County Superior Court on Jan. 2 on behalf of former HealthPlus patient Kristin DeBenedictis. Rubenstein says he has other clients who underwent procedures at HealthPlus and will be filing additional suits against the facility.
HealthPlus, established in 2016, is an ambulatory surgery center that performs orthopedic, podiatry, pain management and plastic surgery, it said in a statement issued Dec. 26. During the state-ordered shutdown, HealthPlus improved its infection control and medication dispensing procedures, hired new staff to ensure compliance with high standards, including a new director of nursing and a sterile processing consultant, a quality consultant, an infection preventionist and a consultant pharmacist. The center also hired new sterile processing staff, and supervised the cleaning and repairing of all instruments by an outside vendor, HealthPlus said in its statement.
The lawyer for HealthPlus, Mark Manigan of Brach Eichler in Roseland, said in a statement that “HealthPlus is complying with the DOH's directive regarding patient testing and the test results notification process. Since reopening on September 27, 2018, HealthPlus is fully compliant. The Center will provide additional updates as appropriate.”
Manigan said in another statement, issued Dec. 29, the facility's director of nursing resigned the day before the state inspection and was later replaced. HealthPlus terminated and replaced two additional employees on Sept. 17. Manigan also said HealthPlus hired consultants to provide a procedural overhaul and to train staff.
“We are confident that the issues raised by the Department have been addressed,” Manigan said in the statement.
Manigan also said a Department of Health report showed that multidose medicines were improperly dispensed and that lapses in sterilization procedures occurred. Those lapses primarily involved orthopedic instruments and surgical trays.
A preliminary report of the first 186 patients to undergo testing for HIV and hepatitis B and C shows none of them came back positive for acute infection, but one preliminary result indicated a case of chronic hepatitis, according to Manigan's statement.
Rubenstein said the litigation against HealthPlus will still be viable, even if no patients contracted illnesses as a result of the sanitation problems at the center. Former patients of the facility are entitled to compensation for mental anguish related to uncertainty of waiting for test results, he said.
“Whether one contracts HIV or hepatitis as a result of what happened, or fears the contracting of HIV or hepatitis because of what happened, in either instance they are entitled to damages,” Rubenstein said.
Epstein said it's unclear whether those members of the potential class who get a negative test result will require follow-up testing in the future. He added that the class could be much larger than the 3,778 people who received letters from HealthPlus, because that figure does not include spouses and partners of former patients at the facility who may have contracted HIV or hepatitis through sexual contact.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View All$10 Million Settlement Reached for Baby Injured by Disconnected Ventilator
3 minute readJury Awards Horizon $2.4 Million for Fraudulent Billing Against 3 NJ Health Care Providers
2 minute readVirtua Drug Tests Pregnancy Patients Without Consent, NJ Attorney General Alleges in New Suit
3 minute readNJ Supreme Court Considers Ability to Add Nonparty Doctors to Med Mal Verdict Sheets
4 minute readTrending Stories
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250