Surgical Center Faces Lawsuits After Former Patients Urged to Get Tested
Two suits were filed in late December against HealthPlus Surgery Center, and a third was expected this week after state inspectors reported lapses in sanitation at the facility.
January 03, 2019 at 12:53 PM
5 minute read
Lawsuits against a Saddle Brook outpatient surgery center are multiplying after thousands of its former patients were instructed to undergo testing for HIV and hepatitis.
Two suits were filed in late December against the HealthPlus Surgery Center, and a third suit was expected on Jan. 2. Filed in Bergen County Superior Court, the lawsuits come after state inspectors reported major lapses in sanitation at the facility.
State inspectors found that surgical instruments at the facility had debris in the hinges, were rusty and discolored and that surgical staff failed to cover up their facial hair while operations were being conducted, according to their report.
The state Department of Health shut down HealthPlus on Sept. 7 after an inspection revealed poor drug storage methods, an outdated infection control plan and unacceptable sterilization practices. The facility was allowed to reopen on Sept. 28.
And on Dec. 17, HealthPlus sent letters to 3,778 people instructing them to have blood tests for hepatitis B, hepatitis C and HIV. Those individuals were treated at the center between Jan. 1, 2018, and Sept. 7.
Michael Maggiano of Maggiano, DiGirolamo & Lizzi in Fort Lee filed suit on Dec. 28 on behalf of a potential class of people who underwent treatment at the center, and their spouses. The plaintiffs in his suit are Lauren Marrero, a former HealthPlus patient, and her husband, Julio Marrero. The suit brings claims of negligence, and a count for loss of society, consortium, companionship and services.
Maggiano said he's hearing “devastating accounts” of the impact the potential infection is having on the lives of class members. One such person, who works in food service, told Maggiano's office that she was thinking of suicide. Maggiano said he arranged to have her evaluated by doctors. Another plaintiff said she's been shunning her husband's kisses since he received the letter instructing him to get tested.
Michael Epstein of the Epstein Law Firm in Rochelle Park filed suit on Dec. 31 on behalf of a former patient identified by her initials, C.S. His suit brings claims on behalf of four subclasses: Former patients who were treated at the facility and contracted a disease or infection, former patients who did not contract a disease or infection, a spouse or intimate partner of a former patient of the HealthPlus Surgery Center who contracted a disease or infection as a result, and a spouse or intimate partner who did not contact any disease or infection.
Brooklyn attorney Sanford Rubenstein said he expects to file suit in Bergen County Superior Court on Jan. 2 on behalf of former HealthPlus patient Kristin DeBenedictis. Rubenstein says he has other clients who underwent procedures at HealthPlus and will be filing additional suits against the facility.
HealthPlus, established in 2016, is an ambulatory surgery center that performs orthopedic, podiatry, pain management and plastic surgery, it said in a statement issued Dec. 26. During the state-ordered shutdown, HealthPlus improved its infection control and medication dispensing procedures, hired new staff to ensure compliance with high standards, including a new director of nursing and a sterile processing consultant, a quality consultant, an infection preventionist and a consultant pharmacist. The center also hired new sterile processing staff, and supervised the cleaning and repairing of all instruments by an outside vendor, HealthPlus said in its statement.
The lawyer for HealthPlus, Mark Manigan of Brach Eichler in Roseland, said in a statement that “HealthPlus is complying with the DOH's directive regarding patient testing and the test results notification process. Since reopening on September 27, 2018, HealthPlus is fully compliant. The Center will provide additional updates as appropriate.”
Manigan said in another statement, issued Dec. 29, the facility's director of nursing resigned the day before the state inspection and was later replaced. HealthPlus terminated and replaced two additional employees on Sept. 17. Manigan also said HealthPlus hired consultants to provide a procedural overhaul and to train staff.
“We are confident that the issues raised by the Department have been addressed,” Manigan said in the statement.
Manigan also said a Department of Health report showed that multidose medicines were improperly dispensed and that lapses in sterilization procedures occurred. Those lapses primarily involved orthopedic instruments and surgical trays.
A preliminary report of the first 186 patients to undergo testing for HIV and hepatitis B and C shows none of them came back positive for acute infection, but one preliminary result indicated a case of chronic hepatitis, according to Manigan's statement.
Rubenstein said the litigation against HealthPlus will still be viable, even if no patients contracted illnesses as a result of the sanitation problems at the center. Former patients of the facility are entitled to compensation for mental anguish related to uncertainty of waiting for test results, he said.
“Whether one contracts HIV or hepatitis as a result of what happened, or fears the contracting of HIV or hepatitis because of what happened, in either instance they are entitled to damages,” Rubenstein said.
Epstein said it's unclear whether those members of the potential class who get a negative test result will require follow-up testing in the future. He added that the class could be much larger than the 3,778 people who received letters from HealthPlus, because that figure does not include spouses and partners of former patients at the facility who may have contracted HIV or hepatitis through sexual contact.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllNJ Supreme Court Clarifies Affidavit of Merit Requirement for Doctor With Dual Specialties
4 minute readArbitrators Under Fire for Allegedly Forcing Workers to 'Stay or Pay' Employers
5 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Gunderson Dettmer Opens Atlanta Office With 3 Partners From Morris Manning
- 2Decision of the Day: Court Holds Accident with Post Driver Was 'Bizarre Occurrence,' Dismisses Action Brought Under Labor Law §240
- 3Judge Recommends Disbarment for Attorney Who Plotted to Hack Judge's Email, Phone
- 4Two Wilkinson Stekloff Associates Among Victims of DC Plane Crash
- 5Two More Victims Alleged in New Sean Combs Sex Trafficking Indictment
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250