Long Branch Police Officer Settles Consolidated Auto Case for $1.62 Million
A former Long Branch police officer has received $1.62 million as compensation for injuries he received in two separate accidents: one while off-duty…
January 07, 2019 at 08:00 AM
5 minute read
A former Long Branch police officer has received $1.62 million as compensation for injuries he received in two separate accidents: one while off-duty and another while on the job. The Monmouth County cases, which were consolidated for trial purposes, were Aponte v. Hanan and Aponte v. Gorman.
Plaintiff Raul Aponte, now 56, of Long Branch, settled the lawsuits on Nov. 5 with defendants Fortune and Morris Hanan of Brooklyn, and Timothy Gorman Jr. of Chambersburg, Pennsylvania, and has since received his settlement funds from the three insurance carriers involved, said Aponte's attorney, Jack Sanders.
Aponte retired from the Long Branch Police Department on May 1, 2015, as a result of injuries he sustained in the two accidents, said Sanders, of Shrewsbury's Shebell & Shebell. Aponte had not worked since March 2014 because of the injuries, Sanders said.
Aponte was first injured on Aug. 27, 2012, when Gorman failed to stop in time to avoid a collision on Route 537 in Hamilton Township, Mercer County, Sanders said.
The second accident occurred on Aug. 13, 2013, while Aponte was on duty and performing a traffic stop on Fortune Hanan in front of the Long Branch train station, Sanders said. Hanan accidentally backed up into Aponte's police car, Sanders said.
As a result of the accidents, Aponte sustained lower back injuries, including an aggravation of previous, work-related lower back problems, according to Sanders. Aponte had surgery in March 2014 to fuse two levels of his lumbar spine, which required a second surgery after his back became infected. He then had a third surgery in August 2017 to extend the lumbar fusion over two additional levels, Sanders said.
Hanan had two policies: one from Chubb, which contributed $1.1 million to the settlement, and another from the Hartford Insurance Co., which contributed $500,000, Sanders said. The carriers retained Suzanne Marasco of Hill Wallack in Princeton, who did not return a call seeking comment.
Gorman's carrier, Horace Mann Insurance Co., contributed $20,000 to the settlement, Sanders said. That carrier retained Virginia King of the Philadelphia office of Goldberg, Miller & Rubin. She declined to comment.
Sanders said the cases settled after mediation with Maria Accardi of the Monmouth County Civil Division Settlement Program.
The consolidated cases, filed in Monmouth County Superior Court, had not been scheduled for trial, Sanders said.
— Michael Booth
|$1M for Repairman's Hand Injury
Silva v. Colgate Paper Stock Co.: A man whose hand was crushed while he was repairing a machine at a paper recycling facility agreed to a $1 million settlement in his Middlesex County suit on Dec. 11, 2018.
Domingos Silva was making a repair at Colgate Paper Stock in New Brunswick on June 3, 2014, when a reversible conveyor belt unexpectedly began to rotate, crushing his hand between the conveyor frame and a gear box mount, the suit claimed.
The injury occurred when Silva loosened a chain on the conveyor belt, then made the repair to the conveyor, and was tightening the chain. The reversible conveyor was programmed to activate when a recycling hopper was filled to a certain level, said Peter Chamas of Gill & Chamas in Woodbridge, who was the lawyer for Silva. The hopper had filled to the appropriate level at the time Silva was tightening the chain, Chamas said.
An investigation revealed that a pin assembly that held the gear box mount in place was missing, allowing the mount to rotate, pinning Silva's hand, Chamas said. Photographic evidence after the accident showed that there was improper wearing on the conveyor frame near the pin assembly, he said. The head of the bolt holding the pin assembly in place had broken off, and the vibration from the machine ultimately caused the pin assembly to work itself out of its slot, thereby releasing the gear box mount to move whenever the conveyor was activated, Chamas said.
Silva asserted that the company that produced the conveyor belt system, Machinex, designed and manufactured the pin assembly in a defective manner that allowed for an improper wearing of the mechanical pieces. Silva also claimed that Colgate Paper Stock and a subsidiary, Dinar Management, were partly liable by failing to ensure that the reversible conveyor was locked out at the time of the accident.
Silva, 38 at the time of the accident, suffered a crush injury to the right hand with a partial tendon laceration of the index finger, and ulnar nerve laceration of the middle finger. He underwent two surgeries to repair the right hand but is left with a limited ability to flex his fingers, making him unable to make a fist with that hand, the suit claimed.
He didn't return to T&M Repair, where he worked at the time of the accident, but now is employed as a maintenance worker for another company.
Colgate Paper Stock, Dinar Management and Machinex agreed to the $1 million settlement after mediation with Marc Baldwin, a former Superior Court judge now with Baldwin Resolutions in Vincentown, on Dec. 11. Liberty Mutual was the carrier for all three defendants, and a breakdown of the portion paid on behalf of each was not disclosed, according to Chamas.
Machinex was represented by Thomas Walters of Bolan Jahnsen Dacey in Shrewsbury, who confirmed the settlement.
Colgate was represented by William Bloom of Methfessel & Werbel in Edison. He also confirmed the settlement.
— Charles Toutant
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllJudge Approves $667K Settlement Against Independence Blue Cross for Unpaid, Pre-Shift Computer Work
4 minute readTurning the Tables: Defense Litigators Embrace Lawsuits, Alleging Fraud at Plaintiffs Shops
6 minute readTitle Insurance Agency on Hot Seat Over Homebuyer Fees, Alleged Kickbacks
3 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Gibson Dunn Sued By Crypto Client After Lateral Hire Causes Conflict of Interest
- 2Trump's Solicitor General Expected to 'Flip' Prelogar's Positions at Supreme Court
- 3Pharmacy Lawyers See Promise in NY Regulator's Curbs on PBM Industry
- 4Outgoing USPTO Director Kathi Vidal: ‘We All Want the Country to Be in a Better Place’
- 5Supreme Court Will Review Constitutionality Of FCC's Universal Service Fund
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250