Neiman Marcus to Pay $1.5M to End Data Breach Probe
New Jersey's share of the settlement in $57,465, according to a release from the state Attorney General's Office.
January 08, 2019 at 06:29 PM
3 minute read
The original version of this story was published on Connecticut Law Tribune
In order to end an investigation into the 2013 breach of customer payment card data at 77 U.S. stores, Neiman Marcus has agreed to pay $1.5 million to 43 states and the District of Columbia, including New Jersey, attorneys general across the country announced Tuesday.
New Jersey's share of the settlement in $57,465, according to a release from the state Attorney General's Office.
“As more shoppers choose to go cashless, it becomes even more important for businesses to properly safeguard the databases they use to store consumers' personal information,” Attorney General Gurbir Grewal said in a statement, noting that Deputy Attorney General Elliott M. Siebers handled the matter. “We're gratified to have been part of the multi-state Executive Committee that played a role in achieving this outcome on behalf of consumers both here in New Jersey and across the country.”
Texas-based Neiman Marcus disclosed the data breach in January 2014, saying payment card information at certain stores had been compromised by an unknown third party. The states' investigation determined that approximately 370,000 payment cards were involved, and at least 9,200 of the total payment cards compromised in the breach were used fraudulently, according to the attorneys general.
In addition to the money, Neiman Marcus has agreed to a series of changes intended to prevent similar breaches in the future. Those include working agreements with two separate forensic investors, updating all software involved in payments, reviewing industry-accepted technologies and encrypting payment card information.
Asked for comment on the settlement, the company sent this statement: “We are pleased this matter is now resolved.”
Connecticut Attorney General George Jepsen, whose office took a lead role in the matter, said in a news release, “Retailers have a responsibility under Connecticut law to keep consumer information safe and to make accurate representations to consumers through their privacy policies about the security of the personal information they collect.”
Connecticut co-led the multijurisdiction investigation along with the Illinois Attorney General's Office, and Connecticut's share of the settlement funds is $102,574.
Several other state attorneys general applauded the settlement.
“New Yorkers deserve to shop with confidence, which includes trusting that their personal information will be protected,” New York Attorney General Letitia James said in a news release. “With the monetary settlement and the implementation of several new data security policies, this marks a significant win for those who shop in New York. This office will continue its commitment to combat inadequate data security in the state of New York.”
Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton said his state law requires businesses to “maintain reasonable safeguards against cyberattacks to protect consumers' personal information from unlawful use or disclosure.” Paxton added, “I urge companies to evaluate whether they have in place a thorough and ongoing written information security program that serves to safeguard their customers' information.”
“When a retailer collects and retains credit card information, they owe a duty to their customers,” Georgia Attorney General Chris Carr said in a release. “We will remain vigilant in working with public and private sector partners to protect Georgia consumers and their personal information.”
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllAmazon's Audible Hit With Privacy Class Action Over Use of Tracking Pixels
NJ Workers Can't Sue for Alleged Employment Discrimination Over Marijuana Use, 3rd Circuit Rules
4 minute read'A Mockery' of Deposition Rules: Walgreens Wins Sanctions Dispute Over Corporate Witness Allegedly Unfamiliar With Company
Trending Stories
- 1'It's Not Going to Be Pretty': PayPal, Capital One Face Novel Class Actions Over 'Poaching' Commissions Owed Influencers
- 211th Circuit Rejects Trump's Emergency Request as DOJ Prepares to Release Special Counsel's Final Report
- 3Supreme Court Takes Up Challenge to ACA Task Force
- 4'Tragedy of Unspeakable Proportions:' Could Edison, DWP, Face Lawsuits Over LA Wildfires?
- 5Meta Pulls Plug on DEI Programs
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250