2 Ukrainian Men Face Criminal Charges in SEC Hacking Case
Artem Radchenko, 27, and Oleksandr Ieremenko, 26, both from Kiev, Ukraine, are alleged to have participated in a scheme to hack into SEC's EDGAR database to get nonpublic information. The SEC claims the participants' trades generated at least $4.1 million in illegal profits.
January 15, 2019 at 03:16 PM
4 minute read
Federal prosecutors have filed criminal charges against two Ukrainian men accused of hacking into the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission's computer system to spread nonpublic information to a network of traders who illegally profited from it.
Federal prosecutors in New Jersey on Tuesday unsealed a 16-count federal indictment charging Artem Radchenko, 27, and Oleksandr Ieremenko, 26, both from Kiev, Ukraine, with securities fraud conspiracy, wire fraud conspiracy, computer fraud conspiracy, wire fraud, and computer fraud.
“The defendants charged in the indictment announced today engaged in a sophisticated hacking and insider trading scheme to cheat the securities markets and the investing public,” said New Jersey U.S. Attorney Craig Carpenito in a press release announcing the criminal charges. “They targeted the Securities and Exchange Commission with a series of sophisticated and relentless cyber-attacks, stealing thousands of confidential EDGAR filings from the Commission's servers and then trading on the inside information in those filings before it was known to the market, all at the expense of the average investor.”
The indictment claims that Ieremenko participated in a previously disclosed scheme to hack into the agency's electronic filing system and to get nonpublic information to trade on. Ieremenko was charged in 2015 with allegedly hacking newswire services to gain nonpublic information as part of a scheme that the SEC claims yielded more than $100 million in profits.
According to Tuesday's criminal indictment, Ieremenko “employed some of the same techniques and methods that he had used in the Newswire Hacking Scheme” when hacking into the SEC's Electronic Data Gathering, Analysis and Retrieval system, or EDGAR. According to the indictment, the hacked EDGAR servers are housed in New Jersey.
Prosecutors claim that the defendants sent emails to SEC employees that were designed to appear as if they were coming from other employees at the agency. The indictment claims that those phishing emails were used to install malware on certain SEC computers which the defendants then used to get access to filings from publicly traded companies that had not yet been made public.
In a related civil enforcement action filed Tuesday in the District of New Jersey, lawyers at the SEC claim that Ieremenko worked alongside six individual traders in California, Ukraine, and Russia and two entities to make trades before more than 150 earnings releases from May to October 2016. The SEC claims those trades generated at least $4.1 million in illegal profits.
Beyond Radchenko and Ieremenko, the SEC's civil complaint in the case names six additional individuals and two entities that the agency claims traded on information gleaned from the hacking scheme. The individual defendants include Sungjin Cho and David Kwon in Los Angeles; Igor Sabodakha, Victoria Vorochek, and Ivan Olefir in Ukraine, and Andrey Sarafanov in Russia. The entities charged include Capyield Systems Ltd., allegedly owned by Olefir, and Spirit Trade Ltd.
Information about defense counsel in both the criminal and civil cases wasn't immediately available.
In a statement released Tuesday, SEC Chairman Jay Clayton said that the agency must remain vigilant to maintain the integrity of the market.
“No system can be entirely safe from a cyber intrusion,” Clayton said. “Here at the SEC, we recognize that we must continuously use the resources available to us efficiently and effectively to bolster our cybersecurity defenses and reduce our cyber risk profile.”
Read the indictment:
Read the SEC complaint:
|This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllAs Trafficking, Hate Crimes Rise in NJ, State's Federal Delegation Must Weigh in On New UN Proposal
4 minute readWhat Went Wrong With Adeel Mangi's Long, Strange Trip Through the Judicial Nomination Process?
6 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Call for Nominations: Elite Trial Lawyers 2025
- 2Senate Judiciary Dems Release Report on Supreme Court Ethics
- 3Senate Confirms Last 2 of Biden's California Judicial Nominees
- 4Morrison & Foerster Doles Out Year-End and Special Bonuses, Raises Base Compensation for Associates
- 5Tom Girardi to Surrender to Federal Authorities on Jan. 7
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250