Criminal Justice Reform Law a Good Start
Although far from perfect, these reforms are extremely important for persons convicted of federal crimes, their families, and federal criminal law practitioners.
January 21, 2019 at 10:00 AM
2 minute read
President Trump signed this multi-year, bipartisan federal criminal justice legislation on Dec. 21, 2018. Congress has finally begun to follow the lead of some states in coming to grips with the huge fiscal and human costs associated with mass incarceration and difficult reentry into society for those convicted of crimes. The act contains many compromises and is not seen by anyone as perfect or eliminating the need for further reform.
The act requires that a federal prisoner, subject to availability and security matters, be placed in a federal prison “as close as practicable to the prisoner's primary residence.“ This is an important response to the problem of family separation, which interferes with rehabilitation. The law also liberalizes the opportunity for low-risk inmates to serve a portion of their sentence through home confinement; expands eligibility for elderly offender home detention and compassionate release; requires the Bureau of Prisons to assist in obtaining the proper forms of identification prior to release; requires the bureau to expand its treatment of opioid and heroin addiction; requires a wide range of new types of information to be provided by the bureau; requires the bureau to provide female inmates with sanitary products free of charge; restricts the use of solitary confinement for juveniles; provides funding for reentry programs at the state level; restricts enhanced sentencing and mandatory minimum sentences for prior drug felonies (not retroactive); liberalizes the three-strikes law; makes retroactive the 2010 elimination of the disparity between crack-cocaine and powder-cocaine; restricts the use of restraints on pregnant inmates; requires the development of a “recidivism risk” assessment of each inmate and provides incentives for their participation in recidivism-reduction programs; and provides, at least for some prisoners, the possibility of receiving “time credits“ that lead to earlier pre-release custody.
There are a number of other provisions in this new law, as well as authorization for substantial funding for its implementation. Although far from perfect, these reforms are extremely important for persons convicted of federal crimes, their families, and federal criminal law practitioners. We look forward to the successful implementation of these reforms as well as additional improvements that may attract bipartisan agreement.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllAs Trafficking, Hate Crimes Rise in NJ, State's Federal Delegation Must Weigh in On New UN Proposal
4 minute readWhat Went Wrong With Adeel Mangi's Long, Strange Trip Through the Judicial Nomination Process?
6 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Tuesday Newspaper
- 2Judicial Ethics Opinion 24-85
- 3Decision of the Day: Administrative Court Finds Prevailing Wage Law Applies to Workers Who Cleaned NYC Subways During Pandemic
- 4Trailblazing Broward Judge Retires; Legacy Includes Bush v. Gore
- 5Federal Judge Named in Lawsuit Over Underage Drinking Party at His California Home
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250