NJ Judge Suspended for Making Clandestine Recordings of Staff Meetings
Superior Court Judge Deborah Gross-Quatrone has been suspended without pay for two months over secret recordings she made of meetings with her colleagues and superiors.
January 25, 2019 at 03:15 PM
4 minute read
Superior Court Judge Deborah Gross-Quatrone has been suspended without pay for two months over secret recordings she made of meetings with her colleagues and superiors.
The Supreme Court ordered the suspension Jan. 24 after Gross-Quatrone was accused of recording three meetings she attended at the Bergen County Courthouse with Assignment Judge Bonnie Mizdol and others. Gross-Quatrone recorded the third meeting with Mizdol after the assignment judge told her not to make a recording, according to the presentment in the case.
The court's order said Gross-Quatrone's conduct represents violations of canons requiring judges to observe high standards of conduct so that the independence and integrity of the judiciary may be preserved, and to promote public confidence in the integrity and impartiality of the judiciary.
The suspension is the latest development in a feud between Gross-Quatrone and Mizdol—one involving claims in a civil suit that Mizdol criticized her colleague's wardrobe and hairstyle, as well as accusations, later deemed by the Advisory Committee on Judicial Conduct to be unsupported, that court staff were ordered to do homework assignments for Gross-Quatrone's son.
Gross-Quatrone's counsel in the civil case, meanwhile, has promised to continue pursuing that case, which had been stayed pending ethics proceedings.
Gross-Quatrone was accused of secretly recording the three meetings in December 2015 with Mizdol and various others. The ACJC said she demonstrated a “lack of veracity and an inability to conform her conduct to the high standards of conduct expected of judges.” At the third meeting, the trial court administrator, Laura Simoldoni, seeing a red light glowing in Gross-Quatrone's purse, reached in and removed an Olympus digital voice recorder that was being used to record the meeting, the ACJC said. Gross-Quatrone initially said she did not know how to operate the device but later was shown to have recorded the meeting secretly, the ACJC presentment said. Gross-Quatrone later said she was justified in secretly recording the meetings in order to protect herself from hostilities and abuse allegedly inflicted by Mizdol.
The ethics complaint that accused Gross-Quatrone of making secret recordings also said she used her judicial secretary to perform various personal tasks. But that evidence did not clearly establish that such conduct violates the Code of Judicial Conduct, the ACJC concluded.
Gross-Quatrone also was charged with having her judicial law clerk start work early, contrary to court policy, but Gross-Quatrone's knowledge of that policy could not be established by clear and convincing evidence, the ACJC said in its presentment.
Gross-Quatrone was confirmed to the bench in March 2015 after a stint as president of the Bergen County Bar Association. She was initially assigned to Passaic County but was relocated to Bergen County a few months later. She has served in the Civil Division in Essex County since early 2016.
In 2017, Gross-Quatrone filed a gender discrimination and hostile work environment suit against Mizdol in federal court. According to the suit, Mizdol kept close tabs on Gross-Quatrone's attendance and made critical remarks about her appearance, remarking on one occasion about her “beach hair and flip flops” and on another about her “fancy clothes and bare legs.” Mizdol denied any wrongdoing.
Gross-Quatrone's federal suit was administratively terminated last July until the conclusion of the related ACJC proceeding.
The Jan. 24 order leaves the door open for Gross-Quatrone to ask the court to reinstate the civil case after the disciplinary proceeding is resolved.
Gross-Quatrone's lawyer, Ralph Ferrara, said in a statement, “Judge Gross Quatrone has had a distinguished career as an attorney and as a judge. She excelled on the bench in Passaic County and in Essex County, winning the praises of her colleagues. The reason there was a problem in this case is because of the way she was inappropriately treated in Bergen County. She looks forward to having her day in court before a jury when the civil case is tried.”
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllHit by Mail Truck: Man Agrees to $1.85M Settlement for Spinal Injuries
Trending Stories
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250