Equal Rights Amendment? New Jersey Has Had One Since '47
The Delaware milestone can serve as a reminder to those in our state that we too have a state ERA.
January 28, 2019 at 09:00 AM
2 minute read
New Jersey State Flag
On Jan. 16, the Delaware Legislature completed the process of adopting an Equal Rights Amendment to its state constitution. It reads: “Equality of rights under the law shall not be denied or abridged on account of sex.” Delaware now joins the list of states providing textual protection from gender discrimination. Notably, it is the only state in the Union that does not require proposed state constitutional amendments to be submitted to the voters for ratification. Rather, if an amendment passes both houses by a two-thirds majority, it is published before the next general election. If it once again passes by a two-thirds majority after the election, it becomes part of the constitution.
The list of states with ERAs, however, often leaves out New Jersey despite the fact that, since 1947, our state constitution has banned sex discrimination.
The 1947 Constitutional Convention included eight women out of 81 elected delegates. These women pressed for, among other things, an equal rights amendment. After much negotiation, the delegates agreed to propose an amendment to the 1844 Art. I, section 1, that would change the word “men” to “persons,” thus reading “ All persons are by nature free and independent….” The convention also proposed a new Art. X, section 4, providing that words like “person … shall be taken to include both sexes.” It is clear from the convention records that these changes were intended to provide equal rights for women. Lest this approach was seen as a “stealth” ERA, the explanation of the new constitution provided to the voters made its purpose very clear.
In 1977 the New Jersey Supreme Court recognized, in Peper v. Princeton University, that these changes constituted an ERA that could be applied, at least in the employment context, even without state action.
So, the Delaware milestone can serve as a reminder to those in our state that we too have a state ERA.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View All![High-Speed Crash With Police Vehicle Nets $1.6 Million Settlement High-Speed Crash With Police Vehicle Nets $1.6 Million Settlement](https://images.law.com/cdn-cgi/image/format=auto,fit=contain/https://images.law.com/njlawjournal/contrib/content/uploads/sites/404/2022/06/Police-Car-Lights-767x633.jpg)
![$19.1M Verdict: 'Most Accurate Settlement Demand I Ever Made' $19.1M Verdict: 'Most Accurate Settlement Demand I Ever Made'](https://images.law.com/cdn-cgi/image/format=auto,fit=contain/https://k2-prod-alm.s3.us-east-1.amazonaws.com/brightspot/59/f1/40ee68e24dc3bfda5780ae72a445/new-jersey-state-police-car-767x633.jpg)
![Judge in AGs' Suit Set to Block 'Chaotic' Trump Funding Freeze Judge in AGs' Suit Set to Block 'Chaotic' Trump Funding Freeze](https://images.law.com/cdn-cgi/image/format=auto,fit=contain/https://k2-prod-alm.s3.us-east-1.amazonaws.com/brightspot/07/3b/f5ca989c4c78b88ca04717405e37/us-district-court-district-of-rhode-island-767x633.jpg)
Trending Stories
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250