Biker Hit by Drag Racer Wins $39 Million Verdict in New Jersey
The $39 million verdict is for pain and suffering. It will be added to an earlier judgment of about $4.5 million for medical expenses. That total will be reduced by a 60 percent apportionment to the uninsured drag-racing driver in default. Still, the plaintiff's lawyers say they plan to collect nearly $20 million from the property owner.
February 01, 2019 at 06:34 PM
4 minute read
In a damages-only trial, a Middlesex County Superior Court jury returned a $39 million verdict for the pain and suffering of a motorcycle rider who was run over by a drag-racing car in an Edison industrial park six years ago.
According to lawyers in the case and court documents, plaintiff Hussein Agiz was 18 at the time of the accident. Both his bike and the car exploded into balls of fire, said the lawyers who tried his case, Bruce Nagel and Andrew O'Connor of Nagel & Rice in Roseland.
In Agiz's case against the owner of the 10-acre property, the jury deliberated three hours before reaching the $39 million verdict for pain, suffering, impairment and loss of enjoyment of life. The trial before Judge Michael V. Cresitello Jr. took two days, Nagel said.
Agiz's arm was severed in the crash. Soon after, doctors had to remove his leg. He survived 10 additional surgeries to amputate more and more of his arm and leg to save his life. He had so many other injuries that a doctor testified he was “the definition of multiple trauma,” according to a New Jersey Superior Court appellate ruling from last year. He continues to suffer phantom pain from the amputations, but doesn't like to take medication for it because it's not good for him, and isn't helpful, he claimed in the suit.
“He's one of the most inspirational men I've ever met in my life,” Nagel said Thursday. “He's worked to put himself through college. He wants to be an advocate for disabled people. He's an inspiration to everyone who meets him. He's an absolutely extraordinary human being.”
That judgment will be combined with an award of $4.5 million for medical expenses from an eight-day trial two years ago. There, the jury found property owner Heller Industrial Parks Inc. was negligent and proximately caused the accident.
After that trial, Nagel and O'Connor challenged the noneconomic portion of the 2016 verdict—$2.3 million—on the basis that the jury failed to consider some of the judge's instructions regarding calculating the present value of pain and suffering. The judge agreed, and granted a new trial. The defense appealed, but the Appellate Division in May 2018 affirmed and upheld the order for a new trial on noneconomic damages only.
The math is further complicated by the apportionment of the earlier verdict: 60 percent to the drag-racing driver—Jonathan Bonilla, who had no insurance, went to prison and defaulted on the lawsuit—and 40 percent to Heller. Bonilla testified that he never saw Agiz before striking him, documents said.
Nagel said with interest, he expects the final judgment to be about $49 million, with 40 percent—or nearly $20 million—against Heller.
Heller was defended by William Mergner Jr. and David Dering of Leary, Bride, Mergner & Bongiovanni in Cedar Knolls. They didn't return calls seeking comment.
The complaint was originally filed by Steven Haddad of the Haddad Law Firm in Woodbridge, who is listed in the docket as attorney for Agiz.
The suit alleged that after-hours drag racing had been going on for years in the industrial park, with crowds gathering to watch. The park is a 10-acre property with 9 million square feet of warehouses and long, straight public roads. Agiz had gone there to meet other bikers. He was hit when he was driving through the park and two cars came at him from the opposite direction drag racing, the lawyers and documents said.
Lawyers for Agiz alleged the management of the property failed to take security measures that could have broken up the drag racing.
The appeals court judges, in ordering the new trial for noneconomic damages only, remarked on the unusual achievements of a young man so seriously injured.
“He plays sports and even received a golf scholarship for amputees,” the judges noted. “He attends college for biomedical engineering and hopes to make his own prosthetics in the future.”
Nagel said Agiz will soon graduate from Rutgers University with an engineering degree. He said he hopes the verdict will give his client “a small measure of comfort in the future.”
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View All'A More Nuanced Issue': NJ Supreme Court Considers Appellate Rules for Personal Injury Judgments
5 minute readAppellate Division Rejects Third Circuit Interpretation of NJ Law, Says No Arbitration for Insurance Fraud
4 minute readNJ Manufacturing Company Sues Insurer to Recoup PFAS Remediation Losses
4 minute readTrending Stories
- 1In Novel Oil and Gas Feud, 5th Circuit Gives Choice of Arbitration Venue
- 2Jury Seated in Glynn County Trial of Ex-Prosecutor Accused of Shielding Ahmaud Arbery's Killers
- 3Ex-Archegos CFO Gets 8-Year Prison Sentence for Fraud Scheme
- 4Judges Split Over Whether Indigent Prisoners Bringing Suit Must Each Pay Filing Fee
- 5Law Firms Report Wide Growth, Successful Billing Rate Increases and Less Merger Interest
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250