BAR REPORT - Capitol Report
Weinberg nondisclosure bill gains momentum in Legislature
February 04, 2019 at 08:00 AM
3 minute read
This is a status report provided by the New Jersey State Bar Association on recently passed and pending legislation, regulations, gubernatorial nominations and/or appointments of interest to lawyers, as well as the involvement of the NJSBA as amicus in appellate court matters. To learn more, visit njsba.com.
Weinberg nondisclosure bill gains momentum in Legislature
A bill that would ban nondisclosure agreements in settlements involving workplace harassment passed the New Jersey Assembly last week and was expected to pass in the state Senate as well. S-121 (Weinberg)/A-1242 (McKeon) gained momentum last week on the heels of the Legislative Oversight Committee's ongoing investigation into claims that the Murphy administration mishandled claims of a Murphy campaign staffer who was allegedly raped by another staffer, who since became a senior administration official. The New Jersey State Bar Association has underscored problems with the bill as written and urged recommendations to amend the legislation to protect employees while providing a choice for the employee to enter into a confidentiality agreement.
“The NJSBA recognizes the fundamental right of people who are victimized to make a choice to keep their private matters confidential,” the statement read. “Only the victim can decide how best to move forward after having experienced workplace harassment or assault or discrimination.”
Among the NJSBA's recommendations for amendments, referred to by the association as “employee choice amendments,” is a ban on nondisclosure agreements as a condition of employment as void and unenforceable.
Additional amendments recommended to strengthen the bill include:
- express permissions to disclose details of an agreement to certain individuals and governmental agencies;
- a 21-day review period for the employee to consider a nondisclosure provision and a seven-day revocation period following the execution of any agreement that contains such a provision;
- express permission for employers to promulgate reasonable workplace rules to investigate and remediate such complaints, consistent with applicable law; and
- a prohibition on retaliatory action against the person who made disclosures permitted under the law.
The association underscored the sensitive nature of these types of agreements, pointing out that such a broad ban would chill settlements, lead to more litigation, and ultimately lead to a revictimization of the reporting employee. “As a practical reality, employees who settle their claims typically have grave concerns about continuing to provide financially for their families and usually must continue in their careers,” said the NJSBA in its statement.
The NJSBA continues to advocate for amendments to the bill to strengthen its aim to protect employees.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllTrending Stories
- 13 Incidents Lead to Charges Against the Alexander Brothers; Cousin Remains at Large
- 2Sidley Austin Elects Biggest Combined Class of Partners and Counsel in Firm History
- 3High Court Drops Case Over Nvidia's Effort to Ditch Fraud Suit
- 4Commentary: Law, Literature and Revenge
- 5Attorneys, Professors Share Support for Chancellor Following Musk's Online Attacks
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250