Law Firm Agrees to $115K Settlement of Overtime Dispute With Employee
Pressler, Felt & Warshaw has agreed to a $115,000 settlement of claims that it violated wage-and-hour laws by failing to pay overtime to an information technology worker for the firm.
February 04, 2019 at 03:30 PM
4 minute read
New Jersey collections law firm Pressler, Felt & Warshaw has agreed to a $115,000 settlement to resolve claims it violated wage-and-hour laws by failing to pay overtime to an information technology employee.
The law firm, which was known as Pressler & Pressler until last March, agreed to the settlement in U.S. District Court in Newark, along with New Century Financial Services Inc., a debt collector that regularly works with the firm. U.S. District Judge Claire Cecchi approved the settlement last Friday.
Pressler Felt was sued in August 2017 by Scott Rosenblatt, who was an IT hardware technician. Rosenblatt was scheduled to work from 9 a.m. to 5 p.m., but some of his duties, such as updating the firm's servers, could only be performed late at night or on the weekend, his lawsuit asserted. Rosenblatt was hired in 2009, but in October 2012, the firm switched Rosenblatt's status from an hourly to a salaried employee. His duties and job title remained unchanged, but the law firm ceased paying Rosenblatt overtime.
The defendants wrongfully withheld more than $30,000 from Rosenblatt in the three-year period before the suit was filed, according to the complaint.
Rosenblatt complained numerous times to managers about having to perform work without pay on nights or weekends, the suit said. In one instance, he emailed the firm's compliance manager in August 2015, asserting he was required to perform 180 hours of unpaid work during the prior year, in addition to his 40-hour workweeks, and asking why he was not paid for those hours.
He was told that the company's policy was “no punching in when working remotely,” the suit said. He made further complaints about the policy in March 2016 and again in March 2017. In that instance, Rosenblatt complained to his boss that he had put in 12 to 15 hours of overtime in one weekend to update the firm's servers, and complained it was unfair to expect him to work on weekends without compensation.
A few weeks later, he was told his services were no longer needed, and was terminated, according to his lawsuit. But two days afterward, the firm posted an advertisement for a new IT technician.
The suit brought claims for failure to pay overtime and retaliation in violation of the Fair Labor Standards Act and the New Jersey Wage and Hour Law.
The suit emphasized that Rosenblatt was not employed by the firm as a computer systems analyst, computer programmer or software engineer, and his duties did not include designing, developing, creating or testing computer systems or programs. Furthermore, the suit said, Rosenblatt did not possess authority to commit the firm in financial matters, possess authority to implement management policies or operating practices, or possess the authority to deviate from established policies without approval.
Besides Pressler Felt, the suit named attorneys Sheldon Pressler and Gerald Felt as defendants. Sheldon Pressler died in December 2017 at age 87. Also named were New Century Financial Services Inc. and its vice president, Eric Sombers. According to the suit, the president of NCFSI, Lee Pressler, is a relation of Sheldon Pressler. Sombers has authority to make work assignments and rules for Pressler Felt's IT department and to supervise and discipline employees in that department, and to hire and fire employees.
Pressler & Pressler was found in 1930 and held itself out as the largest and oldest law firm specializing in retail debt collection in New Jersey, the suit claimed. The law firm, based in Parsippany, became Pressler Felt in March 2018 to reflect its changed management, according to court papers.
Under the motion for approval of the settlement that was signed by Cecchi, the settlement will be paid from the estate of Sheldon Pressler.
Pressler & Pressler and New Century Financial Services have jointly faced monetary penalties in the past. In 2016 the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau fined Pressler & Pressler $1 million and New Century $1.5 million for allegedly filing lawsuits to collect debts that do not exist.
Benjamin Curcio of Curcio Mirzaian Sirot in Roseland, who represented Rosenblatt, said through an assistant that the firm would not comment.
Bruce Nimensky and David Gray of Gray Law Group in Whippany, who represented the defendants, did not return calls seeking a comment.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllA Year of Controversy: NJ Judges Face Disciplinary and Legal Issues With Mixed Results in 2024
4 minute read2024 in Review: Judges Met Out Punishments for Ex-Apple, FDIC, Moody's Legal Leaders
Appellate Division Greenlights State Bar's Leadership Diversity Initiatives
5 minute readTrending Stories
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250