Lowenstein Faces Malpractice Lawsuit Over Creation of 'Dynasty' Trust
The suit says Lowenstein's Eric Weinstock failed to properly assess the risks inherent in transferring real estate assets belonging to Samuel Raia and his family into the dynasty trusts established by the law firm.
February 04, 2019 at 06:01 PM
3 minute read
Lowenstein Sandler has been hit with a legal malpractice lawsuit over a series of “dynasty” trusts it established for a high-powered real estate mogul.
The suit says Lowenstein's Eric Weinstock failed to properly assess the risks inherent in transferring real estate assets belonging to Samuel Raia and his family into the dynasty trusts established by the law firm. The tax liability associated with the estate plan when the real estate assets pass from one generation to the next will be greater than anticipated, according to the Feb. 1 lawsuit filed in Bergen County Superior Court.
Raia's family business, which acquires, develops and manages real estate, owns a portfolio of 3,000 multifamily properties in seven states. Raia is a past president of the Republican State Committee and was mayor of Saddle River from 2009-2017.
Lowenstein Sandler has advised the Raia family business and its operators on professional and personal matters for roughly 30 years, according to the lawsuit. The firm began providing the family with estate planning advice in the early 2000s.
Weinstock began advising the Raia family in 2011, working alongside JPMorgan Chase & Co. and accounting firm J.H. Cohn, which became CohnReznick in 2012. A series of dynasty trusts were established in 2012. But in 2016, after consulting with another law firm that was not identified in court documents, the Raia family learned of adverse income tax consequences of the advice from Lowenstein Sandler and Weinstock, the suit claims.
A dynasty trust is designed to pass assets from one generation to the next without incurring transfer or gift taxes. But the defendants failed to alert the Raia family that conveying real estate into dynasty trusts could eliminate the plaintiffs' ability to transfer assets with a stepped-up basis, triggering phantom gains that create tax liabilities and causing losses relating to elimination of the depreciation reset of assets, the suit claims. The failure of Weinstock and the Lowenstein firm to advise the plaintiffs of such consequences was a breach of the applicable standard of care, the suit claims.
The suit brings claims for legal malpractice and breach of fiduciary duty against Weinstock and Lowenstein.
Raia filed the suit along with 17 family members, five trusts and two other corporations. They are represented by Gary Werner of Schenck, Price, Smith & King in Florham Park and Barry Coburn of Coburn & Greenbaum in Washington, D.C.
Coburn declined to answer questions about the suit, and Werner did not return calls.
Lowenstein's general counsel, David Wissert, said in a statement, “While we do not comment on ongoing legal proceedings, we strive constantly to provide the most appropriate legal advice to our clients in all matters, and we look forward to demonstrating this in court with respect to this estate planning matter.”
Raia and members of his family filed a similar suit against CohnReznick in March 2018. Werner said in court documents that the plaintiffs will move to consolidate its suit against Lowenstein and Weinstock with the CohnReznick suit, which has been stayed pending efforts to mediate. JPMorgan was involved in “rendering related advice and in related conduct” but “it is our view that their involvement was such that they should not be made a part of this lawsuit,” Werner said.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllThe Real Estate Consumer Protection Enhancement Act Brings Industry Change
9 minute readTrending Stories
- 1In 2-1 Ruling, Court Clears Way for Decade-Old Wrongful Imprisonment Suit
- 2Trump Sentencing, TikTok Ban Welcome Justices Back to Work
- 3U.S. Eleventh Circuit Remands Helms-Burton Trafficking Case Involving Confiscated Cuban Port
- 4Can Passive Technology Change the Impaired Driving Trajectory?
- 5Bradley Arant, Moore & Van Allen Join Partner Promotions Parade
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250