PHH to Pay $750K to Service Members Who Lost Homes
“The brave men and women who serve in our nation's armed forces frequently are required to deploy and serve overseas with little notice,” U.S. Attorney Craig Carpenito said. The settlement assures they "will be compensated for the damages they suffered when their homes were improperly foreclosed upon while they were serving our country.”
February 06, 2019 at 05:41 PM
4 minute read
New Jersey-based mortgage company PHH Mortgage Corp. entered into a $750,000 settlement agreement Wednesday with the U.S. Justice Department to resolve wrongful foreclosure claims by military service members.
The agreement was signed by Justin Walker, vice president, legal, on behalf of PHH. The settlement resolves allegations made in a lawsuit, United States v. PHH, filed in U.S. District Court for the District of New Jersey. The complaint alleged that PHH violated the Servicemembers Civil Relief Act (SCRA) by unlawfully foreclosing on active-duty service members' homes without the required court orders.
The agreement requires PHH to pay $125,000 to each of the six servicemen and -women who lost their homes. The agreement also requires PHH to provide training to its staff to guard against similar incidents in the future.
The SCRA statute requires that service members may not be foreclosed on, during military service or for one year after, in connection with mortgage obligations that originated before that military service began unless there's a court order or waiver, according to the suit.
“The brave men and women who serve in our nation's armed forces frequently are required to deploy and serve overseas with little notice,” U.S. Attorney Craig Carpenito said in a news release Wednesday. “This Office remains resolute in its commitment to honor their personal sacrifices when they do so by ensuring that servicemembers' rights will be protected, as the law requires, whenever duty calls.”
The settlement document notes that PHH “has cooperated fully” with investigators and “neither admits nor denies any wrongdoing.”
“We take our responsibilities to assist service members very seriously, and we regret whenever any customer experiences a hardship that could be avoided,” a spokesman for PHH said Thursday. “The Department of Justice (DOJ) reviewed PHH Mortgage Corp.'s (PHH) entire portfolio of non-judicial foreclosures from January 2010 to September 2018 and identified six potentially adversely affected service members where foreclosures all occurred prior to 2012. PHH fully cooperated with the investigation and voluntarily agreed to compensate the service members without admitting any wrong doing.”
The statement said settling the case “was in the best interest of these service members, and allows the company to move forward and avoid protracted litigation,” and said the Justice Department “reviewed PHH's foreclosure policies and procedures and found them to be compliant with the Servicemembers Civil Relief Act.”
PHH Mortgage Corporation is now a wholly-owned subsidiary of Ocwen and continues to operate as the PHH Mortgage Corporation, the spokesman said.
The Justice Department news release also included a statement from Assistant Attorney General Eric Dreiband. “Our men and women in uniform deserve to be able to focus on their job of keeping our country safe without worrying about losing their home to an unlawful foreclosure,” Dreiband said. “The Civil Rights Division is committed to protecting the rights of our servicemembers from unlawful conduct.”
The complaint described PHH as “a stand-alone mortgage company that originates, sells, services and subservices residential mortgage loans,” and one of the largest mortgage loan servicers in the country, with last reported annual sales of $456 million. The complaint said the service members had been ordered to report for duty when PHH foreclosed on their homes.
The settlement agreement releases litigation holds of documents related to the complaint and stipulates that litigation is no longer anticipated, provided the terms are met. The parties agreed that “upon any such claim of breach as made by the United States, the United States may move to restore” the lawsuit to the active docket. In such a case, PHH consented not to contest. And the Justice Department said it could bring a civil action for breach of agreement.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllAs AI-Generated Fraud Rises, Financial Companies Face a Long Cybersecurity Battle
Where CFPB Enforcement Stops Short on Curbing School Lunch Fees, Class Action Complaint Steps Up
5 minute readBank of America's Cash Sweep Program Attracts New Legal Fire in Class Action
3 minute readDOJ: TD Bank Agrees to Pay $3B Over Anti-Money Laundering Program Violations
2 minute readTrending Stories
- 1In Novel Oil and Gas Feud, 5th Circuit Gives Choice of Arbitration Venue
- 2Jury Seated in Glynn County Trial of Ex-Prosecutor Accused of Shielding Ahmaud Arbery's Killers
- 3Ex-Archegos CFO Gets 8-Year Prison Sentence for Fraud Scheme
- 4Judges Split Over Whether Indigent Prisoners Bringing Suit Must Each Pay Filing Fee
- 5Law Firms Report Wide Growth, Successful Billing Rate Increases and Less Merger Interest
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250