McCusker Anselmi Defeats Lawsuit Over Delayed McDonald's Development
Environmental contamination from a 180,000-gallon underground oil tank on the site was ultimately revealed as the cause of the delays, Judge Bruno Mongiardo said.
February 08, 2019 at 03:49 PM
4 minute read
A Passaic County judge has dismissed a suit accusing McCusker, Anselmi, Rosen & Carvelli and its attorneys of trying to impede development of a new McDonald's restaurant.
Judge Bruno Mongiardo dismissed the suit against the firm and its attorneys after concluding that land-use objections they advanced while representing a rival McDonald's franchise owner did not delay the development of a new McDonald's in Passaic. Environmental contamination from a 180,000-gallon underground oil tank on the site was ultimately revealed as the cause of the delays, Mongiardo said in a decision that was made public Thursday.
The site's developer, Passaic Industrial Properties, withheld documentation about the oil tank from the McCusker Anselmi defendants, but the defendants learned of the environmental problems after submitting an Open Public Records Act request to the state Department of Environmental Protection, Mongiardo said.
The ruling dismisses the suit in its entirety. Besides the McCusker Anselmi firm, defendants in the case who were dismissed include attorneys Paul Carvelli and William Munday, as well as their former client, Sebastian Lentini, and two other defendants, Darren Lentini and Christina Gervasi. Three others from the firm—John McCusker, Andrew Anselmi and Bruce Rosen—were previously dismissed from the case.
Passaic Industrial Properties' complaint against the McCusker Anselmi firm and its attorneys cited a suit they filed in September 2015 to challenge approval of the McDonald's application by the Passaic Zoning Board of Adjustment on behalf of three local residents. That case was dismissed in January 2016 after Passaic Industrial Properties argued the alleged objectors never authorized McCusker Anselmi to file the suit on their behalf. Passaic Industrial Properties then filed the present suit against McCusker Anselmi and its attorneys in February 2016, accusing them of tortious interference with contract, interference with economic advantage and conspiracy.
Passaic Industrial Properties claimed in its suit that McCusker Anselmi's filing of the objection suit caused delays to its receipt of income from the project through a land lease with McDonald's.
But the plaintiff's conduct during the 879-day discovery period was “very disturbing,” Mongiardo said. The plaintiff had in its possession “undisclosed, outcome-determinative documents demonstrating that the alleged damages it claims in these consolidated actions were caused not by the McCusker defendants' zoning objections and lawsuit, but rather by known, pre-existing environmental contamination on the property,” Mongiardo said.
Ultimately, Passaic Industrial Properties produced the ground lease on March 19, 2018, after initially claiming the document was confidential. Its terms show that none of the McCusker firm's actions could have resulted in any damages to the plaintiff, because the contract does not provide for rent payments from McDonald's until the restaurant is open for business or when construction is complete, Mongiardo said. To date, neither of these contingencies has been met, but through no fault of the McCusker Anselmi firm, whose objection suit was terminated in January 2016.
“The three-year delay in construction was likely caused because plaintiff's development site required remediation and oversight by the New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection. Plaintiff has withheld and concealed this information from defendants,” Mongiardo said.
Dismissal with prejudice has repeatedly been recognized by the New Jersey Supreme Court as an appropriate sanction for concealment and contumacious failure to provide discovery in the manner established in the present case, Mongiardo wrote.
John Neubauer, chief operating officer of McCusker Anselmi, said in a statement, “The claims against our firm were entirely without basis in fact or law and have properly been dismissed on summary judgment. We are pleased to have this matter finally addressed and exposed as utterly meritless and made in bad faith.”
Christopher Carey of McElroy, Deutsch, Mulvaney & Carpenter in Newark, representing the McCusker firm, did not return a call about the case. Jack Dweck and Chris Fraser of the Dweck Law Firm in New York, who represented Passaic Industrial Properties, also did not return calls.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View All3rd Circuit Strikes Down NLRB’s Monetary Remedies for Fired Starbucks Workers
Trending Stories
- 1'A Death Sentence for TikTok'?: Litigators and Experts Weigh Impact of Potential Ban on Creators and Data Privacy
- 2Bribery Case Against Former Lt. Gov. Brian Benjamin Is Dropped
- 3‘Extremely Disturbing’: AI Firms Face Class Action by ‘Taskers’ Exposed to Traumatic Content
- 4State Appeals Court Revives BraunHagey Lawsuit Alleging $4.2M Unlawful Wire to China
- 5Invoking Trump, AG Bonta Reminds Lawyers of Duties to Noncitizens in Plea Dealing
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250