Spinal Injuries from Auto Accident Lead to $1.5 Million Settlement in Middlesex
A woman who suffered spinal injuries after her car was struck in a rear-end accident agreed to a $1.5 million settlement in her Middlesex County suit, Pittman…
February 11, 2019 at 09:00 AM
4 minute read
A woman who suffered spinal injuries after her car was struck in a rear-end accident agreed to a $1.5 million settlement in her Middlesex County suit, Pittman v. Collins, on Jan. 18.
Alma Pittman was stopped at a stop sign on Montague Avenue at the intersection with Green Street in Woodbridge on Aug. 25, 2015, when her car was struck from behind by a vehicle driven by James Collins. Collins was an employee of the Cerebral Palsy Association and was driving a vehicle owned by the association.
The crash left Pittman with severe, radiating pain at L5-S1 and aggravated a past spinal fusion at L4-L5, the suit claimed. She underwent a new fusion operation, in which the hardware from the prior fusion was removed and new hardware implanted at L4-L5 and L5-S1, according to her attorney, Nicholas Leonardis of Stathis & Leonardis in Edison. She also exhibited age-related degeneration of the spine, he said.
The case had preceded through discovery and was scheduled for a December 2018 trial. Medical experts for the plaintiffs said Pittman's prior back injuries were aggravated and made significantly worse as a result of the crash, but defense experts took the position that MRIs after the crash showed the same findings as those before it, according to Leonardis.
The defense claimed Pittman's injuries and her need for surgery were the result of her prior accident and degeneration, and not the collision that is the focus of the suit, he said.
Pittman returned to work after the prior crash, which was in 2013, but was unable to do so after the latest crash, Leonardis said.
The suit claimed $300,000 in medical expenses and lost wages.
The parties settled Jan. 18
The lawyer for Collins and the Cerebral Palsy Association, Timothy Haggerty of Stephen Gertler's office in Wall, declined to comment on the case.
— Charles Toutant
|No-Cause in Hunterdon County
Reichert v. Britt: A Hunterdon County jury on Dec. 6, 2018, issued a defense verdict in an under-insured-motorist case against GEICO by a policyholder who had been involved in an auto accident.
According to counsel for defendant Government Employees Insurance Co., on Oct. 1, 2014, plaintiff James Reichert, 54, a salesperson of industrial equipment, was stopped in traffic on Route 202 in Raritan when his sedan was rear-ended by a car. He claimed permanent spinal injuries. Reichert sued the driver, Sheri Britt, alleging that she was negligent in the operation of a vehicle. Britt had a $15,000 insurance policy; as a result, Reichert sued his carrier, GEICO, seeking to recover his $300,000 under-insured-motorist policy. The defendants stipulated to liability, and the case was tried on the issues of causation and damages.
For two years, Reichert regularly treated with spinal manipulation, massage and exercise; at least 94 chiropractic sessions; and physical therapy. Reichert underwent MRIs and was diagnosed with herniations at the cervical, thoracic and lumbar levels. Reichert testified that he suffers ongoing neck and back pain, which limits his activities of daily living.
Reichert's expert in orthopedic surgery opined that the accident caused his herniations and necessitated extensive treatment. The expert determined that Reichert suffered permanent spinal injuries, and stated that Reichert would likely need to undergo cervical and lumbar fusions in the future. The defense's expert in orthopedic surgery, who examined Reichert, testified that his MRIs showed degenerative findings in the cervical, thoracic and lumbar spine. Additionally, there were no findings on Reichert's physical exam. The expert concluded that there was no objective evidence of any permanent injury to Reichert, and that he had only suffered temporary sprains.
After a three-day trial before Hunterdon County Superior Court Judge Michael F. O'Neill, the seven-member jury unanimously rendered a defense verdict. It found that the defendants' negligence was not a factual cause of injury to Reichert.
GEICO was represented by Darren C. Kayal of Rudolph & Kayal in Manasquan; Britt, by Brittany N. Edgerley-Dallal of the Law Offices of Robert A. Raskas in Piscataway Township; and Reichert, by Joseph W. Gable and Deborah S. Dunn of Stark & Stark.
*Editor's Comment: This report is based on information that was provided by Government Employees Insurance's counsel. Plaintiff's counsel and Britt's counsel did not respond to the reporter's phone calls.
— Adapted from VerdictSearch reports
|This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllAmid Growing Litigation Volume, Don't Expect UnitedHealthcare to Change Its Stripes After CEO's Killing
6 minute readJudge Approves $667K Settlement Against Independence Blue Cross for Unpaid, Pre-Shift Computer Work
4 minute readTurning the Tables: Defense Litigators Embrace Lawsuits, Alleging Fraud at Plaintiffs Shops
6 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Foreign-Company Lobbyists Would Need to Register Under Proposed DOJ Regulation
- 2'Fancy Dress': ERISA Claim Accuses Plan Administrator and Cigna Affiliates of Co-Pay Maximizer Scheme
- 3The American Lawyer's Top Stories of 2024
- 4Semiconductor Component Maker Accused of Deceiving Investors About Market Downturn, Export Curbs
- 5Zuckerman Spaeder Gets Ready to Move Offices in DC, Deploy AI Tools in 2025
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250