Ocean County Med Mal Case Settles for $1.3 Million
A suit claiming that a woman had to have her colon removed because of failure to diagnose a blockage, Szymanski v. Rothman, settled in Ocean County…
February 15, 2019 at 01:00 PM
4 minute read
A suit claiming that a woman had to have her colon removed because of failure to diagnose a blockage, Szymanski v. Rothman, settled in Ocean County for $1.3 million on Dec. 21.
On Aug. 23, 2013, plaintiff Kathryn Szymanski, then 61, went to Ocean Medical Center in Brick with constipation. After an examination and X-rays, she was sent home, according to her lawyer, Daryl Zaslow of Eichen Crutchlow Zaslow in Edison.
She returned to the hospital by ambulance the next day, with continued constipation, vomiting and abdominal pain, and was examined by emergency physician Michael Rothman, who diagnosed a bowel obstruction but released Szymanski with instructions to consult with her oncologist, as she had recently begun chemotherapy treatment for breast cancer, Zaslow said.
Szymanski was again admitted to Ocean Medical Center on Aug. 26, 2013, and diagnosed with a large bowel obstruction. During emergency surgery, she underwent a colectomy and ileostomy, and has since used a colostomy bag, Zaslow said.
The suit claimed Rothman deviated from the standard of care and should have ordered a CT scan during Szymanski's second hospital visit, which she alleged would have revealed the blockage. She claimed earlier surgery would have prevented damage to the colon and avoided its removal.
Named as defendants in the suit were Rothman, his medical group, EM-1 Medical Services, and Ocean Medical Center.
Zaslow said Szymanski returned to work as a case worker for the Lakewood Tenant Organization months after the surgery, and is a candidate to have the ileostomy reversed, but is presently not planning that surgery because of potential complications such as bleeding and infection.
The parties had completed discovery and had a trial scheduled for February when they settled on Dec. 21, during a settlement conference with Ocean County Superior Court Judge Craig Wellerson. Rothman agreed to pay his $1 million policy limit; EM-1 Medical Services, $200,000; and Ocean Medical Center, $100,000, according to Zaslow.
Rothman and his medical group were represented by Sean Buckley of Buckley Theroux Kline & Petraske in Princeton. Ocean Medical Center was represented by Donald Grasso of Orlovsky Moody Schaaff & Conlon in West Long Branch. Neither returned a call about the case.
— David Gialanella
Gilbert v. Kar: A driver who suffered neck injuries in a three-vehicle crash on the New Jersey Turnpike agreed to a $905,000 settlement in his Middlesex County suit on Dec. 7, 2018.
Calvin Gilbert of Bridgeport, Connecticut, was driving on the Turnpike in Newark on Dec. 22, 2015, when his vehicle collided with a disabled sport utility vehicle. The SUV had rolled into traffic while a flatbed truck driver was attempting to tow it away.
The SUV's owner said his vehicle had the parking brake engaged, but when the driver from Moran Towing arrived on the scene and attempted to place it on the flatbed, it rolled across three lanes of traffic before colliding with the front of Gilbert's vehicle in the left travel lane, said his lawyer, Edward Capozzi of Brach Eichler in Roseland. Gilbert's vehicle was then struck from behind by a second vehicle, whose driver left the scene of the accident.
Gilbert sustained cervical lumbar bulges and herniations in the crash, and after conservative treatment failed to provide relief from pain, he underwent a series of lumbar injections and an anterior discectomy with fusion at C3-4-5, said Capozzi, who handled the case with the firm's Dennis Shlionsky.
The settlement provides Gilbert with $850,000 from Moran Towing, $50,000 in phantom vehicle coverage from Gilbert's own policy with Progressive Insurance Co., and $5,000 from the owner of the disabled SUV, Ryan Kar.
The lawyer for Moran Towing, Kyle Everly of Nicholson Law Group in Media, Pennsylvania, declined to comment. Richard Giannone of Cooper Maren Nitsberg in Iselin, who represented Progressive, and Lynn Hershkovits-Goldberg of Viscomi & Lyons in Morristown, representing Kar, did not return calls.
— Charles Toutant
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllAmid Growing Litigation Volume, Don't Expect UnitedHealthcare to Change Its Stripes After CEO's Killing
6 minute readJudge Approves $667K Settlement Against Independence Blue Cross for Unpaid, Pre-Shift Computer Work
4 minute readTurning the Tables: Defense Litigators Embrace Lawsuits, Alleging Fraud at Plaintiffs Shops
6 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Decision of the Day: Judge Reduces $287M Jury Verdict Against Harley-Davidson in Wrongful Death Suit
- 2Kirkland to Covington: 2024's International Chart Toppers and Award Winners
- 3Decision of the Day: Judge Denies Summary Judgment Motions in Suit by Runner Injured in Brooklyn Bridge Park
- 4KISS, Profit Motive and Foreign Currency Contracts
- 512 Days of … Web Analytics
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250