Lowenstein Revenue Up 14.2 Percent; PPP Jumps 17.9 Percent
Lowenstein Sandler followed a strong 2017 with an even better 2018, with marked increases in firmwide and per-lawyer financial metrics, as well as lawyer head count growth.
February 26, 2019 at 02:43 PM
4 minute read
Lowenstein Sandler followed a strong 2017 with an even better 2018, with marked increases in firmwide and per-lawyer financial metrics, as well as lawyer head count growth.
The firm's gross revenue for last year, a shade less than $309 million, represents a 14.2 percent year-over-year improvement, from $270.59 million.
“Up 14 percent only happens for us when all our groups are firing at the same time,” managing partner Gary Wingens said in an interview, noting that practices that normally can be cyclical and complementary—corporate transactional and bankruptcy—were both up in 2018.
“It doesn't happen that often,” Wingens said.
Still, the firm's “terrific” 2018, as Wingens called it, follows a strong 2017, when year-over-year revenue increased 5.5 percent.
Over a five-year period, gross revenue has grown by about 39 percent, from $222.5 million in fiscal 2013, according to Law Journal data.
According to the firm, revenue growth over a 10-year period is 73 percent.
For 2018, a net gain of 19 lawyers—a 7.1 percent increase—coupled with a 6.4 percent increase in revenue per lawyer, to $1.08 million from $1.01 million, fed the overall revenue jump.
Wingens credited recent lateral adds, chiefly in the growing white-collar litigation practice, with driving the improvements in revenue metrics. Former state Attorney General Christopher Porrino rejoined the firm in January 2018 and has brought in business since, and numerous others from government practice have followed. And Anne Milgram, also a former New Jersey attorney general, who joined Lowenstein in 2017, “landed the largest internal investigation that we did last year,” Wingens noted. She led the probe into allegations of sexual misconduct within the NBA's Dallas Mavericks.
The firm also launched an international trade practice out of its Washington, D.C., office late last year with a four-lawyer group from Baker, Donelson, Bearman, Caldwell & Berkowitz. That was “a practice area that we previously didn't have much depth in,” but trade issues were cropping up with increasing frequency in the course of transactional matters, especially those involving private equity clients, Wingens said.
All told, 2018 was the first year of significant net head count growth at Lowenstein in some time.
The firm pointed to several deals on the transactional side that it said boosted financials in 2018, including handling initial public offerings for medical technology company Motus GI Holdings Inc. and biopharmaceutical company Provention Bio, and advising technology firm Integral Ad Science among others in M&A deals.
Profitability improvements came as well in 2018. Profits per equity partner nearly reached $2.1 million, an increase of 17.9 percent over fiscal 2017's $1.78 million PPP figure. Lowenstein annually appears in the second hundred of the Am Law 200 based on gross revenue rankings, but its $2.1 million PPP figure puts it well above the overall PPP average for Am Law 100 firms in 2017, which was $1.77 million, according to last year's survey.
Wingens said Lowenstein's two-point improvement in profit margin, to 34 percent, is attributable to more work. About 18 percent of the firm's 2018 revenue came on alternative fee arrangements, but hours billed nevertheless increased across practice groups, by 13 percent in total.
“This business is still largely a rate-time-hours kind of business,” Wingens said. “When lawyers are working harder, it does drop to the bottom line.”
It's the second straight year of impressive growth in PPP, as the firm posted a 12.9 percent year-over-year gain in that metric for 2017.
Wingens said the firm is ”pleased but not complacent.” It will continue to “focus on sectors that are transforming the U.S. economy,” representing investment, life sciences and technology clients, while continuing to build its litigation practice, he added.
“We very much saw 2018 as the best year since the onset of the recession in terms of growth across our practice areas,” he said, but ”we are aware that we are in the late stages of an economic expansion that could turn on us.”
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View All$113K Sanction Award to Law Firm at Stake: NJ Supreme Court Will Consider 'Unsettled Law' Frivolous Litigation Question
4 minute readWhich Outside Law Firms Are Irreplaceable, and Which Should Have Gotten the Ax Years Ago?
4 minute readLargest Law Firms: New Jersey and Firmwide Attorney Count
Trending Stories
- 1Philadelphia Bar Association Executive Director Announces Retirement
- 2SEC Chair Gary Gensler to Resign on Trump's Inauguration Day
- 3How I Made Partner: 'Develop a Practice Area You Really Care About,' Says Jennifer A. Gniady of Stradley Ronon
- 4Indian Billionaire Gautam Adani Indicted in Brooklyn for Alleged Orchestration of $250 Million Bribery Plot
- 5St. Ivo: Patron Saint of Lawyers
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250