Lawyers, Don't Pay For Accolades
If you have to pay for your designation of excellence (whether or not it comes with a plaque), don't.
March 01, 2019 at 05:06 PM
4 minute read
What do doctors and dentists and lawyers have in common? Plaques. Plaques that create a wall of respect. A wall to capture the eyes and to convey worth, competence and eminence.
From time to time while waiting in the doctor or dentist or lawyer's office, one can find an array of wall hangings which might consist of diplomas, professional licenses, articles from newspapers extolling civic or professional accomplishments, or jury verdict awards. Hanging in their plain or ornate frames, they give assurance that services will be performed by one of the best. In fact, for those who have made the grade there are laminated “Top Docs” or “Top Dentists.” Similarly, plaques are available to attorneys through plaque marketers evincing quality, certified to by various organizations. Among these are, for example, “Best Lawyers in America”, “Super Lawyers”, and even the venerable Martindale-Hubbell.
We all know of and aspire to Martindale's highest rating of “A-V”—“a testament to the fact that a lawyer's peers rank him or her at the highest level of professional excellence with adherence to ethical standards of conduct.” The legal ability denoted by “A” was for decades defined by Martindale as “Very High.” Somewhere along the line that same “A” morphed into the more prestigious description of “Very High to Preeminent.”
For some time now, Martindale has contracted with a plaque-marketing firm to sell plaques proclaiming its indicia of competence and integrity. That firm, to make the plaques more saleable (for only $179.00), has done Martindale one better and markets the A-V plaque solely as the “Preeminent Rating [which] is the pinnacle of professional excellence.” Other worded plaques are offered to attorneys “to showcase your judicial AV preeminent rating” and ones which celebrate “the 20th anniversary” of having been rated at this preeminent rating level. At best such wall plaques serve to reassure clients or patients. At worst they make attractive wall decorations.
On the other hand, there are pay-to-play plaques pedaled by some ingenious groups. For example, “Lawyers of Distinction” has its most popular $775.00 membership application package, which includes a “genuine cherry wood plaque,” to celebrate you as a Lawyer of Distinction. This organization, however, at one time even accepted for membership Lucy, a teacup poodle, and issued the plaque celebrating Lucy having passed the Lawyers of Distinction vetting process. It is the pride of the attorney who playfully nominated his pup for membership. On another occasion, it also accepted for nomination from another lawyer with a sense of whimsy, Zippy DeShickeen as nominated by “Jon Stewart.”
“America's Top 100 High Stakes Litigators” charges $300.00 for annual membership, the “American Institute of Personal Injury Attorneys – 10 Best Attorneys” charges only $295.00 for its plaque. Even better, the “American Society of Legal Advocates” charges just $200.00 per year for eligibility as a Top 100 litigation lawyer in the state, with which designation comes the ubiquitous plaque. The “Top One Percent of the National Association of Distinguished Counsel” has a $300.00 annual membership payment and “America's Top 100 Attorneys,” limited to the top 100 attorneys in the state, upon acceptance requires payment of a one-time membership fee of $1,000. But, alas, a plaque does not automatically go with their membership honor. A better bargain is recognition by “Top Lawyers of New Jersey,” which provides an “elegant plaque” for only $99.00 (plus shipping and handling).
The moral: If you have to pay for your designation of excellence (whether or not it comes with a plaque), don't.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllNeighboring States Have Either Passed or Proposed Climate Superfund Laws—Is Pennsylvania Next?
7 minute readAn Overview of Proposed Changes to the Federal Rules of Procedure Relating to the Expansion of Remote Trial Testimony
15 minute readTrending Stories
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250