Busy Women Lawyers Are Freezing Eggs and Embryos to Manage Careers
Jacqueline Klosek, a New Jersey resident and counsel to Goodwin Procter's business law department in New York, said, "it would have been really hard to get the career off track and assume I could get it back on.”
March 01, 2019 at 05:45 PM
7 minute read
The original version of this story was published on Law.com
Elizabeth Brown, 29, an associate at Rosenberg & Estis in New York, and two of her best friends are seriously considering freezing their eggs in the next few years if they're still single. She said she loves her job and doesn't want to tear herself away from it.
“Knowing that you can freeze your eggs, it takes so much of the pressure off,” she says of being able to focus on her career instead of going on dates every night. “I value my time and would rather go home and have a glass of wine and watch Netflix than go on a random date because I feel like I should be having kids in the next few years.”
When Brown was in her third year at Yeshiva University Benjamin N. Cardozo School of Law, the American Society for Reproductive Medicine removed the experimental label from oocyte cryopreservation—or egg freezing. The idea that it was possible to freeze eggs—rather than embryos—changed the way that women thought about childbearing and ushered in what fertility specialists are calling a new era of reproductive autonomy. The takeaway: women can have a child from their own egg as late as age 56.
Lawyers, of course, weren't the only ones to flock to preserve their eggs. But experts say they were more likely to do so because they could afford the $20,000 to $30,000 in out-of-pocket costs for the medicine to stimulate egg production, the extraction of the eggs, the storage fees and in vitro fertilization.
Plus, the long career path from college to law school to the bar exam to a clerkship, an in-house job or a stint in the U.S. Attorney's office meant that lawyers often reached their prime childbearing ages just as they were establishing themselves at law firms. Brown, for instance, arrived at Rosenberg & Estis in the summer of 2018 after an in-house counsel job.
Jacqueline Klosek, a New Jersey resident and counsel to Goodwin Procter's business law department in New York, said, “it would have been really hard to get the career off track and assume I could get it back on” if she had wanted to become pregnant at an earlier age. By her late 30s when her gynecologist asked her if she wanted a family, she was still ambivalent. “I honestly wasn't sure whether I wanted to have children, but I wanted to keep my options open,” she said.
So she went on medication to stimulate her ovaries to produce multiple eggs at the age of 38 and ended up with 30. Because she had a boyfriend with whom she had a serious relationship, her doctor suggested that she divide the eggs, fertilizing half to create frozen embryos and leaving the rest unfertilized in case she chose to have children with a different mate. (Doctors prefer freezing embryos to eggs when that's an option because they are more stable and can be tested for abnormalities.)
Klosek did end up staying with her boyfriend, Tom Lozinski, who is now her husband, and they conceived Kayla six years ago. But three years later, Klosek wasn't able to get pregnant a second time, and she had one of the frozen embryos implanted. Luca is now 2.
What would have happened if the gynecologist hadn't asked that fateful question?
“Thinking that I could not have my son I couldn't even think about that,” she says. “To have missed that because I waited too long would have been really hard to accept.”
Until the last five years, lawyers like Klosek and Brown would be unlikely to see a fertility specialist unless they were having trouble becoming pregnant. Stories abound of an earlier generation of lawyers who found themselves unable to conceive because they were too old by the time they sought help.
“For decades a lot of young lawyers have missed opportunities to build families and this technology puts that ability back into their hands,” said Dr. Alan Copperman, director of the division of reproductive endocrinology and infertility at Mount Sinai Health System. “When I started practicing 25 years ago I was seeing a lot of 40-year-olds who had missed their opportunities to have families and I could only do so much for them.”
Copperman, who is also the medical director of RMA of New York, said he sees a lot of lawyers especially from the firms near the fertility clinic's offices at 59th Street and Madison Avenue. “Just as a birth control pill is great at preventing unwanted pregnancy, egg freezing is really getting pretty good at enabling wanted pregnancy,” he says.
He suggests that lawyers who are not ready to start families after law school have fertility checkups in their twenties. This involves a family history, a pelvic ultrasound and a blood test for the anti-mullerian hormone, which is an indicator of how many eggs still remain in the ovarian reserve. More eggs must be extracted if a woman is older when she chooses to extract them because 90 percent of eggs are normal in her twenties but 90 percent are abnormal by her forties.
“So whether someone has cancer and they're about to have chemotherapy or whether someone is 39 and they're about to be 40 this is a medical condition,” Copperman says. “Medically we're preventing disease.”
Even though Copperman sees it as a medical procedure, that doesn't mean that traditional insurance companies are covering egg freezing. It was estimated in 2017 that 5 percent of companies, including Facebook and Uber, are making it an employment benefit and Copperman said the list is growing.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllJudge Approves $667K Settlement Against Independence Blue Cross for Unpaid, Pre-Shift Computer Work
4 minute readEssex County Jury Returns $1.8 Million Verdict for Construction Site Fall
3 minute readLowenstein Hires Ex-FTX US General Counsel Ryne Miller to Lead Its Commodities, Derivatives Practice
3 minute readDrugmaker Wins $70.5M After Fed Judge Says Generic Sales Were Blocked
4 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Elon Musk Names Microsoft, Calif. AG to Amended OpenAI Suit
- 2Trump’s Plan to Purge Democracy
- 3Baltimore City Govt., After Winning Opioid Jury Trial, Preparing to Demand an Additional $11B for Abatement Costs
- 4X Joins Legal Attack on California's New Deepfakes Law
- 5Monsanto Wins Latest Philadelphia Roundup Trial
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250