Settlement for $2.7 Million Approved in Ocean County School Bus Crash Case
An Ocean County Superior Court judge on Feb. 22 approved a $2.7 million settlement for a student injured in a school bus accident, and for the student's…
March 01, 2019 at 02:00 PM
4 minute read
An Ocean County Superior Court judge on Feb. 22 approved a $2.7 million settlement for a student injured in a school bus accident, and for the student's sister for witnessing the injury, in M.P., as guardian ad litem for D.P. and A.P. v. Toms River Schools Board of Education.
On Oct. 18, 20016, D.P., who was 8 years old, and A.P., who was 10 years old, were passengers on a school bus driven by Jody Simone and owned by the Toms River Board of Education. The bus was stopped on New Hampshire Avenue in Toms River, preparing to make a left turn into North Dover Elementary School, and when it made the turn, the bus collided with an oncoming car, said the plaintiffs' lawyer, Norman Hobbie of Hobbie, Corrigan & DeCarlo in Eatontown.
Named as defendants in the suit were the board of education, Simone, and Austin Tobin, the driver of the other vehicle.
D.P., who had cochlear ear implants, sustained a closed-head injury that required replacement and repair surgeries for those implants and led to bilateral hearing loss and headaches, Hobbie said. A.P. asserted a claim under Portee v. Jaffe based on witnessing her brother's injury.
Tobin previously agreed to tender his full $100,000 policy.
The parties had completed discovery and were approaching trial when the school district and the plaintiffs settled on Feb. 4 for $2.6 million, during mediation with Thomas O'Brien of Bathgate, Wegener & Wolf in Lakewood, a retired Ocean County Superior Court judge.
Ocean County Superior Court Judge Arnold Goldman approved the settlement on Feb. 22, according to court documents. The order provides for a $2.45 million award to D.P. and a $250,000 award to A.P., minus fees and costs of about $651,000 for Hobbie Corrigan. though the firm waived its fee in connection with A.P.'s Portee claim, the order said. Most of the net recovery is to be used to purchase annuities for the minor plaintiffs, according to the order.
The $2.6 million sum plus the $100,000 provided by Tobin pushes the gross recovery to $2.7 million.
Michael Kelly of Ronan, Tuzzio & Giannone in Tinton Falls, counsel to Tobin, confirmed that his client paid his policy limit in his portion of the settlement.
Ronald Pruseck of Carluccio, Leone, Dimon, Doyle & Sacks in Toms River, counsel to the school district, didn't return a call about the case.
— David Gialanella
|$626K Auto Verdict in Middlesex
Catena v. Borrelli: A Middlesex County jury reached a verdict on Feb. 7 awarding an Edison man $626,300 in damages from injuries stemming from a 2016 car crash.
According to the plaintiff's lawyer, Michael Fusco of Levinson Axelrod in Edison, the lawsuit stems from a head-on motor vehicle collision in Monroe Township on June 21, 2016. The 54-year-old plaintiff Michael Catena was a passenger in his girlfriend's car, which was hit by another vehicle attempting to make a left turn. Borrelli was previously determined to be at fault for the accident, Fusco said.
Catena sustained injuries to his neck, back and right knee, and underwent numerous treatments. His doctor had recommended surgeries, but Catena had exhausted the benefits on his auto insurance policy and could not pay for them until the award was handed up, according to Fusco.
The jury reached its verdict after three hours of deliberation and four days of trial in Middlesex County Superior court Judge Thomas D. McCloskey's courtroom.
The jury's award included $26,300 for unpaid medical bills, $250,000 for pain & suffering, and $350,000 for future medical expenses, according to the Feb. 22 judgment order signed by McCloskey.
Mary Lou Dennis-Suckow of the Law Offices of Pamela Hargrove in Cranford represented Borrelli and did not return a call seeking comment.
— P.J. D'Annunzio
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllAmid Growing Litigation Volume, Don't Expect UnitedHealthcare to Change Its Stripes After CEO's Killing
6 minute readJudge Approves $667K Settlement Against Independence Blue Cross for Unpaid, Pre-Shift Computer Work
4 minute readTurning the Tables: Defense Litigators Embrace Lawsuits, Alleging Fraud at Plaintiffs Shops
6 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Decision of the Day: Judge Reduces $287M Jury Verdict Against Harley-Davidson in Wrongful Death Suit
- 2Kirkland to Covington: 2024's International Chart Toppers and Award Winners
- 3Decision of the Day: Judge Denies Summary Judgment Motions in Suit by Runner Injured in Brooklyn Bridge Park
- 4KISS, Profit Motive and Foreign Currency Contracts
- 512 Days of … Web Analytics
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250