Bill Removing Statute of Limitations on Sexual Abuse Clears Senate Committee
The measure would make institutions who harbor victimizers liable and would provide that any person who knowingly permitted or acquiesced in the sexual abuse would be civilly liable.
March 07, 2019 at 08:28 PM
5 minute read
A bill that would remove the statute of limitations in certain civil actions for sexual abuse and expand the categories of defendants liable in such actions passed the Senate Judiciary Committee on Thursday.
After five hours of testimony in which dozens gave tearful, personal accounts of sexual abuse, the committee approved S-477 by an 8-1 vote with two members absent. The vote came just after 6 p.m., and loud applause erupted in the room.
The measure, which now heads to the full Senate, would make institutions who harbor victimizers liable and would provide that any person who knowingly permitted or acquiesced in the sexual abuse would be civilly liable.
Under the measure, plaintiffs could sue institutions that protect the perpetrators “due to the negligent hiring, supervision or retention of an employee, agent or servant of a nonprofit corporation, society or association organized exclusively for religious, charitable, educational or hospital purposes.”
Current law requires that personal injury suits involving sexual abuse of a child must be commenced within two years of accrual of the cause of action, except for certain medical malpractice actions on behalf of minors.
The bill aims to extend the current statute of limitations from two years to seven years for adult victims of sexual assault. Additionally, if an incident of sexual assault occurs before the victim turned 18, that person would be able to file a claim any time up until they turned 55. Once signed, the bill would go into effect Dec. 1, 2019.
The Assembly Judiciary Committee is scheduled to take up an identical bill, A-3648, on Monday, May 11, in Committee Room 11 at the Statehouse Annex.
The Senate measure was first introduced on Jan. 9, 2018. A-3648 was introduced on March 12, 2018.
Primary sponsors of the Senate bill are Sens. Nicholas Scutari, D-Middlesex, and Joseph Vitale, D-Middlesex.
S-477 would apply to any action filed on or after the effective date, including but not limited to matters where the statute of limitations has expired and matters filed with a court that have not yet been dismissed or finally adjudicated as of the effective date.
The bill would not revive any action previously dismissed on grounds other than the statute of limitations or revive any action that has been finally adjudicated.
“It's critical that survivors of sex abuse, both children and adults, have an opportunity to access justice, and it also protects the public,” said primary sponsor Vitale, during a break from testimony. “We get to all learn who the predators are, so they can be prosecuted. If we never peel back the curtain, we will never know who they are.
“They are still out there, be it in ministry, coaching or Scouting, and, if they were credibly accused of sexual abuse but the statute of limitation ran out on them,” Vitale said. “They are still out there, and this bill gives us more information for those who accused them.”
S-477 amends the Charitable Immunity Act, holding organizations, such as churches and nonprofits, liable for any “willful, wanton, or grossly negligent act resulting in the commission of various crimes of a sexual nature or sexual abuse.”
The bill would impose liability for individuals' negligence under certain circumstances resulting in the commission of sexual assault or any other crime of a sexual nature or sexual abuse. Such individuals would be liable if that person had a supervisory or oversight role over the person committing the act of sexual assault or sexual abuse.
The lone “no” vote came from Sen. Gerald Cardinale, R-Bergen.
“We understand the gravity of the problem, but I don't think the bill understands the gravity of the problem,” Cardinale said. “I have decided to have a bill drafted to do exactly that. I believe this bill will impose a secondary monetary liability on nonprofits. Pedophiles will just change methodology.”
Among the first to testify inside a packed, emotionally-charged Committee Room 4 was Katie Brennan, the official in the governor's administration who accused a former top Murphy staffer, Albert J. Alvarez, of raping her after a campaign event in April 2017.
On Jan. 7, 2019, Brennan filed a civil suit against the state of New Jersey and Alvarez, seeking damages. She said eight months passed after she was raped before she took legal action, not knowing the “statute of limitations” clock was ticking.
“Victims need this,” she told the 11 committee members. ”Two years is not enough.”
Also seeking justice was Sarah Klein, now 39, the first known victim of former Olympic team doctor Larry Nassar. She claims Nassar abused her starting at age 8 and continued for 17 years.
In January 2018, Nassar, a former USA Gymnastics and Michigan State University doctor, was sentenced to up to 175 years in prison for decades of sexual abuse after more than 150 women and girls testified in court that he sexually abused him.
“The law will not benefit perpetrators and institutions who want to avoid accountability for the devastation and destruction they've caused,” Klein said in her testimony. “Perpetrators and institutions are the ones who benefit from statutes of limitations.”
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllTrending Stories
- 1The Pusillanimous Press
- 2Contract Lifecycle Management Company ContractPodAi Unveils Leah Drive
- 3'Great News' for Businesses? Judge Halts Transparency Mandate
- 4Consilio Announces ‘Native AI Review,’ Expanding Its Gen AI E-Discovery Offerings
- 5Federal Judge Hits US With $227,000 Sanction for Discovery Misconduct
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250