No Ethics Violations for Ex-Prosecutor Accused of Manipulating Former Colleague
The Office of Attorney Ethics accused Yaron Helmer of improperly influencing the actions of the Cumberland County Prosecutor's Office when he represented a distribution company that was the victim of a fraudulent scheme.
March 07, 2019 at 01:25 PM
4 minute read
The Supreme Court has thrown out ethics charges against a former prosecutor accused of exerting improper influence against an agency he used to work for, but the panel still said the case ”highlights a series of troublesome practices and leaves a number of questions unanswered.”
The Office of Attorney Ethics accused Yaron Helmer of improperly influencing the actions of the Cumberland County Prosecutor's Office when he represented a distribution company that was the victim of a fraudulent scheme.
Helmer, of Helmer, Conley & Kasselman in Haddon Heights, was an assistant prosecutor in Cumberland County from 1985 to 1988, and was first assistant prosecutor in the office in 1988 and 1989. In 2009, he was retained by a Vineland company, National Freight Inc., which was under contract to make deliveries for a company called Trident. Trident bounced five checks totaling $158,000 to National Freight.
Trident went out of business in May 2008, prompting National Freight to file a civil suit against Trident and its principals seeking $3 million in damages. National Freight also signed a criminal complaint against Trident, but the Gloucester County Prosecutor's Office declined to press charges. National Freight then retained Helmer to persuade the office to prosecute.
Helmer contacted Assistant Prosecutor David Branco, chief of the major crimes and organized crime bureau and a former colleague and friend. Branco assigned the case to G. Harrison Walters, a three-year veteran who had little experience with white-collar cases. Branco and Helmer “dominated” a meeting they held with National Freight's officers, according to Walters, who also attended.
A plan was agreed on at the meeting that called for prosecutors to seek a sealed indictment against Trident's two principals, who would be arrested by surprise. The office would request high bail amounts, alleging the bail money represented proceeds of a crime, and would see that the bail was used as restitution for National Freight.
Other creditors forced Trident into involuntary bankruptcy in September 2008, and the civil suit was dismissed.
The high-bail plan could have allowed National Freight to recover funds outside of the bankruptcy. But detectives for the prosecutor's office refused to carry out the arrests.
In June 2009, based on testimony of Helmer as the sole witness, a Cumberland County grand jury indicted Trident and two principals, James Land Jr. and Michael Pessiki.
The criminal case was ultimately dismissed with prejudice in August 2010. In 2011, Land and Pessiki sued Helmer in federal court for malicious prosecution, but that case was thrown out in 2012.
The prosecutor's office fired Branco, who is now with Helmer's firm, and suspended Walters for six weeks without pay. The office also referred Helmer to the Office of Attorney Ethics. The Disciplinary Review Board charged him with conduct prejudicial to the administration of justice.
But Chief Justice Stuart Rabner wrote for the court Wednesday that the record does not support the claims. The ultimate decisions were made by the prosecutors, and it's not inappropriate for a private attorney to make a presentation to the prosecutor's office on behalf of a victim, the court ruled.
The OAE said Helmer drafted the indictment, but the record revealed he made detailed recommendations about what he felt the indictment should allege, according to the court. The prosecutor's office relied heavily on those suggestions.
“We cannot conclude from the record that Helmer improperly induced the line prosecutor to act,” the court said.
Having a victim's attorney appear as the sole witness before a grand jury is “highly unusual,” the court said, given his lack of firsthand knowledge of the case. “But the prosecutor, not private counsel, ultimately made the unorthodox decision to proceed in that way,” the court said.
Patricia Quelch of Helmer Conley represented Helmer before the Supreme Court. She said Helmer is “very happy that he was vindicated by the dismissal” of the ethics charges. Helmer conceded in court that “he would have handled some things differently” in the case, Quelch said.
Cumberland County Prosecutor Jennifer Webb-McRae declined to comment.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllMeet the Judges: Senate Confirms 7 Superior Court Nominees in Final 2024 Session
3 minute readAG Had No Authority to Take Control of Paterson PD, Appellate Division Says
4 minute readTrending Stories
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250