Bill Removing Time Bars on Sex Offense Civil Suits Gets Assembly Committee Nod
Committee approvals from Monday and last week set up S-477 to go before a full Senate vote this Thursday in Trenton, while the full Assembly is scheduled to take up A-3648 on March 25.
March 11, 2019 at 09:32 PM
4 minute read
Another round of hugs was exchanged among victims of sexual assault on Monday after A-3648, the bill removing the statute of limitations for civil suits alleging certain sexual offenses, cleared the Assembly Judiciary Committee by a 4-0-2 vote.
The Assembly bill's approval came in shortly before 4 p.m. after three hours of testimony—taking up just over half the time and number of victims at the Senate Judiciary Committee's prolonged hearing last Thursday on the Senate version, S-477. At that hearing, close to four dozen victims testified.
Committee members voting “yes” on Monday were: Chairwoman Annette Quijano (D-Union), Vice chair Carol Murphy (D-Burlington), Gordon Johnson (D-Bergen) and William Spearman (D-Camden).
Abstaining were the two Republicans on the committee: Erik Peterson (R-Hunterdon) and Patrick Michael Caroll (R-Morris).
Both committee approvals from Monday and last week set up S-477 to go before a full Senate vote this Thursday in Trenton, while the full Assembly is scheduled to take up A-3648 on March 25.
“We are thrilled,” said Patty Fortney-Julius of Harrisburg, Pennsylvania, a sexual abuse victim, after Monday's passage. “We need discovery. We need to know what happened to us in New Jersey.”
Fortney-Julius, now 49, and her sisters, Carolyn Fortney, 38 ,Saundra Fortney-Colello, 52, and Lara Fortney-McKeever, 46, gave tearful testimony on Monday and at last Thursday's Senate Judiciary Committee. They recounted how a priest who was transferred from parish to parish in New Jersey before moving to the Harrisburg Diocese in 1980 abused them for years in both states.
Fortney-Julius said her abuse by the Rev. Augustine M. Giella started in eighth grade, when she was 13, and continued for two years. She said Giella abused her sisters at different periods and for varying lengths.
The release last August of findings of a two-year grand jury investigation into widespread sexual abuse of children within six dioceses of the Catholic Church in Pennsylvania and the systemic cover-up by senior church officials in Pennsylvania and at the Vatican was nothing short of seismic, Fortney-Julius said.
Giella, deceased for decades now, was one of the priests named in the grand jury report.
“The Pennsylvania grand jury report was a gift to us, literally,” she said of the scathing report that listed more than a thousand victims and 301 pedophile priests within the Catholic Church, with only two of the priests prosecuted because of statute of limitations laws. “So many things came out, including the cover-ups. We now know so much.”
In a related development also intended to help survivors, A-1711 passed the same Assembly committee on Monday. That bill would establish a “Sexual Assault Victim's Bill of Rights.” The first two of 11 listed rights are to have any allegation of sexual assault treated seriously, with dignity and compassion, and to be notified of existing medical, counseling, mental health, or other services available for victims of sexual assault; and two, to be free from any suggestion that victims are responsible for the commission of crimes against them, were negligent or assumed the risk of being assaulted.
“All victims of sexual violence have the right to be treated with respect, dignity, empathy and a non-judgmental attitude,” Assemblywoman Murphy, a, A-1711 cosponsor, said. “This bill makes clear that victims have the right to be free of any suggestion that they are responsible for the violence committed against them, and have the right to have the sexual assault treated seriously and in accordance with their ability and willingness to proceed legally or personally to recoup their losses from any such violence.”
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllNJ Attorney General's Office Announces Major Shake-Up for Executive Leadership Team
4 minute read'Bewitched by the Technology': $300K to Settle Faulty Facial Recognition
4 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Voir Dire Voyeur: I Find Out What Kind of Juror I’d Be
- 2When It Comes to Local Law 97 Compliance, You’ve Gotta Have (Good) Faith
- 3Legal Speak at General Counsel Conference East 2024: Virginia Griffith, Director of Business Development at OutsideGC
- 4Legal Speak at General Counsel Conference East 2024: Bill Tanenbaum, Partner & Chair, AI & Data Law Practice Group at Moses Singer
- 5Morgan & Morgan Looks to Grow Into Complex Litigation While Still Keeping its Billboards Up
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250