Murphy, Ranking Lawmakers Strike Deal on Pot Legalization, but Opponents Remain
New Jersey Gov. Phil Murphy and legislative leaders reached agreement on key provisions in a plan to legalize marijuana for adult recreational use, including how to tax and regulate it, and expunging past low-level marijuana offenses for certain users as a step toward social reform.
March 12, 2019 at 07:17 PM
6 minute read
New Jersey Gov. Phil Murphy and legislative leaders reached agreement on key provisions in a plan to legalize marijuana for adult recreational use, including how to tax and regulate it, and expunging past low-level marijuana offenses for certain users as a step toward social reform.
The agreement, arriving after several months of behind-the-scenes negotiations, was announced Tuesday in a news release promising introduction of a bill within days.
Under the revised legislation:
- Adult-use marijuana would be subject to an excise tax of $42 per ounce, which will be imposed when marijuana is cultivated.
- Municipalities that are home to a cultivator or manufacturer would receive the revenue from a 2 percent tax on the product within their jurisdiction.
- Municipalities that are home to a wholesaler would receive the revenue from a 1 percent tax on the product within their jurisdiction.
- Municipalities that are home to a retailer would receive the revenue from a 3 percent tax on the product within their jurisdiction.
Among those on board, according to the release, are Senate President Steve Sweeney, D-Gloucester, Assembly Speaker Craig Coughlin, D-Middlesex, Sen. Nicholas Scutari, D-Union, and Assemblywoman Annette Quijano, D-Union.
Both Scutari and Quijano control the Senate and Assembly judiciary committees that the bill must clear to reach floor votes in each chamber.
“Legalizing adult-use marijuana is a monumental step to reducing disparities in our criminal justice system,” Murphy said in a statement. “I believe that this legislation will establish an industry that brings fairness and economic opportunity to all of our communities, while promoting public safety by ensuring a safe product and allowing law enforcement to focus their resources on serious crimes.”
In his recent 2020 fiscal year budget address, social equity and marijuana were clearly on Murphy's radar as he announced that he would only sign a marijuana bill that expunged past marijuana offenses under certain circumstances—which the new bill delivers.
“This is the right step for eliminating decades-old and persistent racial and social inequities,” Murphy said in his March 5 speech outlining a $38.6 billion state budget.
The revised legislation would establish an expedited expungement process for individuals convicted of low-level marijuana offenses, and a virtual expungement process that would automatically prevent certain marijuana offenses from being taken into account in certain areas such as education, housing and occupational licensing.
Additionally, there are a number of provisions that aim to ensure broad-based participation in the industry for minority- and women-owned businesses, low- and middle-income individuals, and disadvantaged communities across the state.
Sweeney said the plan would take marijuana “out of the underground market” and provide a fair regulatory framework.
“This plan will allow for the adult use of cannabis in a responsible way,” Sweeney said. “It will create a strictly regulated system that permits adults to purchase limited amounts of marijuana for personal use. It will bring marijuana out of the underground market so that it can be controlled, regulated and taxed, just as alcohol has been since the end of Prohibition.”
Sweeney—echoing Murphy—said the legislation would also “advance important social reforms to help reverse the discriminatory impact that drug laws have had on diverse communities.”
“We talked and we negotiated in good faith, but most importantly, we listened,” Coughlin said. “I believe this new, regulated industry will help boost our economy, but I'm particularly proud of the critical social justice components included in the bill.”
“The prohibition on marijuana has long been a failed policy,” Scutari added. “This plan will bring an end to the adverse effects our outdated drug laws have had on the residents of our state. As a regulated product, legalized marijuana will be safe and controlled.”
Despite backing from key leadership, the proposal has critics.
Sen. Gerald Cardinale, R-Bergen, the ranking Republican on the Senate Judiciary Committee, who has been among the most vocal opponents of marijuana legalization from the start, was clearly not on board with the latest plan. He called it a “shameful abdication of our duty to protect public health and safety” in a statement Tuesday. Last November, Cardinale testified before the Senate Budget Committee in opposition to the legislation.
“The principle duty of government is to safeguard public health and safety. Legalizing marijuana for recreational use is a shameful abdication of that responsibility,” he said. “In November, New Jersey's law enforcement community testified that we don't have the funds, personnel, or technology to identify drugged drivers.
“This doesn't just put marijuana users at risk. Innocent people who have never touched pot in their life can't get on a Colorado highway anymore without fear of being hit by a drugged driver,” Cardinale said. “This public safety crisis will be substantially worse in New Jersey, because we are the most densely populated and congested state in the nation.
“Mark my words—you won't be able to pull onto the Turnpike without encountering a drugged driver. … We need to think about these problems before rushing towards legalization.”
Cardinale said he also took issue with the “social reform” argument to legalizing marijuana, calling it “utter B.S.”
“The judges and prosecutors who are handling marijuana sentences are simply following our existing drug laws,” he said. “They were appointed by the administration with the consent of the state Senate. If they are not doing their job in a colorblind fashion, then let's hold them accountable [for] that egregious offense. The answer isn't to legalize a dangerous drug, and put more people in harm's way.”
Dr. John Poole, president of the Medical Society of New Jersey, also expressed “grave concerns” over the revised marijuana legislation and urged the governor and the same legislative leaders to exercise restraint in moving forward with it.
“While physicians support decriminalizing adult use for social justice reasons, they oppose legalizing recreational use,” Poole said in a statement. “Creating an entire new industry to sell an intoxicating product to adult users is antithetical to improving the health status of our citizenry.
“Adult use products, such as alcohol and tobacco, are enticing to adolescents and young adults. Legal marijuana will be no different,” he said. “Our state faces high rates of chronic disease, poor maternal health outcomes and sedentary lifestyles. These conditions will not be improved by legalizing marijuana and promoting its use.”
Under the proposed legislation, adult-use marijuana would be governed by a Cannabis Regulatory Commission, composed of five members—three appointed directly by the governor without Senate confirmation, to serve terms of at least four years, and two appointed by the governor upon the recommendations of the speaker and Senate president.
The commission would be tasked with promulgating all regulations to govern the industry and overseeing applications for licensing of adult-use marijuana dispensaries.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllNJ Attorney General's Office Announces Major Shake-Up for Executive Leadership Team
4 minute read'Bewitched by the Technology': $300K to Settle Faulty Facial Recognition
4 minute readTrending Stories
- 1How to Support Law Firm Profitability: Train Partners Up
- 2Elon Musk Names Microsoft, Calif. AG to Amended OpenAI Suit
- 3Trump’s Plan to Purge Democracy
- 4Baltimore City Govt., After Winning Opioid Jury Trial, Preparing to Demand an Additional $11B for Abatement Costs
- 5X Joins Legal Attack on California's New Deepfakes Law
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250