Patient Paralyzed in Rehab Center Fall Gets $28.6M Verdict, But High-Low Deal Limits Recovery
Sandra Szell was admitted to a Kessler's facility while recovering from back surgery to treat spinal stenosis, scoliosis and other problems. She sustained a spinal cord injury two days later and has been paralyzed from the chest down ever since.
March 14, 2019 at 05:14 PM
5 minute read
An Essex County jury returned a $28.6 million verdict against the Kessler Institute for Rehabilitation Monday on behalf of a patient who became a paraplegic due to spinal injuries suffered when aides moved her from a toilet to a wheelchair.
However, the plaintiff won't recover that amount, thanks to a confidential high-low agreement that was in place during the trial.
Sandra Szell, now 72, claimed in her suit that Kessler employees who assisted her were negligent for failing to safely make the transfer. She also claimed that Kessler was vicariously liable for the negligence of its employees. The suit names three Kessler rehabilitation assistants as individual defendants—Agnes Blaszcyk, Laura Priester and Ronald Thomas—and says that all three deviated from accepted standards of care while making the transfer.
Szell was admitted to Kessler's facility in Chester on Jan. 22, 2015, while recovering from back surgery to treat spinal stenosis, scoliosis and other problems. She sustained a spinal cord injury two days later and has been paralyzed from the chest down ever since.
The verdict was returned following a trial before Judge Robert Gardner.
According to court documents, two doctors and a physical therapist who offered expert testimony on behalf of Szell said she was “yanked” backward into the wheelchair and that the three rehabilitation assistants did not use a safe or proper technique when moving her. Priester later claimed she had no recollection of the incident, and Blaszcyk and Thomas gave widely varying versions of what happened.
The experts said Blaszcyk initially determined she would not need assistance while getting Szell, who weighed 230 pounds, out of bed, into a wheelchair and onto the toilet, but she should not have attempted to perform the maneuver alone. When she was unable to move Szell out of the wheelchair, she summoned Priester. Blaszcyk and Priester moved Szell onto the toilet but later struggled to lift her to get up, according to court documents. Priester then left to summon help and returned with Thomas.
Thomas later testified that he arrived to find the patient in an “uncomfortable position,” sliding off the commode and almost on to the floor, according to court documents. But Blaszcyk testified that the patient remained squarely on the commode at all times. Thomas testified that he lifted Szell back onto the commode.
Szell testified that she pulled herself up from the toilet into a standing position but felt she was going to fall, then was “yanked” rapidly backward into the wheelchair by Thomas. She testified that she heard a snapping or a crunch sound but was unsure where it came from. Once she got back in bed, Szell reported a sensation of pins and needles in her feet. The following morning, she said, she was unable to move from just below her chest. She was taken to Morristown Medical Center, where a CT scan showed she had a new spinal fracture.
Szell was represented by Carol Forte of Blume, Forte, Fried, Zerres & Molinari in Chatham. Forte was surprised by the size of the jury award.
“I cannot explain it. I don't know how to account for that number. I guess they felt sorry for her,” Forte said. She added that Szell, a former New Jersey resident now living in Florida, testified by Skype because she was unable to travel for the trial.
Forte said the three rehabilitation assistants received training from Kessler on how to perform various tasks such as transferring a patient, but their testimony showed they did not follow prescribed methods for carrying out such tasks.
The jury found that Blaszcyk and Thomas deviated from the standard of care in treating Szell but concluded that Priester did not. The jury apportioned 96 percent of responsibility for Szell's injury to Kessler's negligent training and that Blaszcyk and Thomas were each 2 percent responsible. Priester was found not responsible.
The jury awarded $25 million for pain, suffering and loss of enjoyment, $3 million for the cost of Szell's future medical care, $200,000 for the plaintiff's out-of-pocket expenses and $400,000 for past and future care by the plaintiff's family members.
Paul Daly of Hardlin, Kundla, McKeon & Poletto in Springfield represented Kessler and the individual defendants.
Derek Bahl, vice president and senior counsel for litigation at Select Medical in Mechanicsburg, Pennsylvania, owner of Kessler Institute, said in a statement, “While Kessler acknowledges the jury's verdict, the case was in fact resolved during the trial for a confidential sum pursuant to a high-low agreement between the parties that included no admission of liability on the part of Kessler or its employees.”
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllJury Awards Horizon $2.4 Million for Fraudulent Billing Against 3 NJ Health Care Providers
2 minute readVirtua Drug Tests Pregnancy Patients Without Consent, NJ Attorney General Alleges in New Suit
3 minute readNJ Supreme Court Considers Ability to Add Nonparty Doctors to Med Mal Verdict Sheets
4 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Infant Formula Judge Sanctions Kirkland's Jim Hurst: 'Overtly Crossed the Lines'
- 2Abbott, Mead Johnson Win Defense Verdict Over Preemie Infant Formula
- 3Guarantees Are Back, Whether Law Firms Want to Talk About Them or Not
- 4Trump Files $10B Suit Against CBS in Amarillo Federal Court
- 5Preparing Your Law Firm for 2025: Smart Ways to Embrace AI & Other Technologies
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250