California Consumer Privacy Act Compliance Tools Take Off
The California Consumer Protection Act (CCPA) arrives next year, which is good news for developers of compliance solutions looking to open up new customer bases.
March 15, 2019 at 03:30 PM
3 minute read
The original version of this story was published on Legal Tech News
At this point, the phrase “there's an app for that” is almost definitely a cliché, but in the case of the many, many privacy regulations cropping up around the globe, it's a cliché that happens to be true.
As luck would have it, the forthcoming California Consumer Privacy Act (CCPA) is both similar and just different enough from the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) to pose a whole new set of threats to companies dealing and consumer data, which means that you should expect to see a new slew of compliance tools on the horizon.
“I think that companies are trying to figure out, 'Well, I can't spend infinite dollars to address this issue. How do I take a finite budget and address these issues?'” said Tomu Johnson, an attorney with Parsons Behle & Latimer and CEO of its subsidiary, Parsons Behle Lab.
Johnson's company created CCPA IQ, a compliance solution that echoes the similarly named GDPR IQ tool Parsons Behle Lab released early in that regulation's lifespan. Think of it like any one of the dozens of iterations on Coca-Cola—the originally recipe tweaked as needed to achieve the desired flavor.
When it comes to a solution like CCPA IQ, that meant paring back on redundant elements such as privacy-by-design (which is exclusive to the GDPR) and building in more intelligence to address the increased specificity the CCPA requires companies to provide with regards to the information they're collecting from consumers.
“We bolster up and add new logic and new questions in order to get at, what are the specific pieces of information that you are gathering from people? Bolster up some of the trade because there are specific trading requirements under the CCPA,” Johnson said.
Parsons Behle Lab isn't the only provider looking to serve as an ice pack for compliance pain points. Earlier this week, TrustArc announced new features within its platform that were designed specifically in response to California's incoming privacy regulations.
Dave Deasy, the company's senior vice president of marketing, said TrustArc was able to gain tremendous leverage from their preexisting GDPR compliance products as they looked towards the CCPA. Especially useful were mechanisms that had been developed to create data inventories and flows, a necessary first step in the journey towards either CCPA or GDPR compliance.
He thinks the CCPA opens up a new market of potential customers that can be placed in to two buckets. In the first, there are institutions—banks, healthcare companies, utilities—that don't maintain a significant presence in Europe and thus didn't invest much in GDPR compliance.
“You have a whole wave of companies that are starting to deal with these very broad and complex complaints just for the first time,” Deasy said.
Other potential clients for CCPA compliance apps are companies who put off GDPR prep until the last minute and were forced to put a lot of the necessary framework into place manually in order to make the compliance date. Having learned a lesson the hard way the first time around, they may be more inclined to seek out a technological assist for the CCPA.
“You're seeing companies kind of go back and look at things and say 'OK, we did a lot of this manually the first time around. We really can't afford to do it manually again,'” Deasy said.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllA Year of Controversy: NJ Judges Face Disciplinary and Legal Issues With Mixed Results in 2024
4 minute readFormer McCarter & English Associate Fired Over 'Gangsta Rap' LinkedIn Post Sues Over Discrimination, Retaliation
6 minute read2024 in Review: Judges Met Out Punishments for Ex-Apple, FDIC, Moody's Legal Leaders
Trending Stories
- 1'Largest Retail Data Breach in History'? Hot Topic and Affiliated Brands Sued for Alleged Failure to Prevent Data Breach Linked to Snowflake Software
- 2Former President of New York State Bar, and the New York Bar Foundation, Dies As He Entered 70th Year as Attorney
- 3Legal Advocates in Uproar Upon Release of Footage Showing CO's Beat Black Inmate Before His Death
- 4Longtime Baker & Hostetler Partner, Former White House Counsel David Rivkin Dies at 68
- 5Court System Seeks Public Comment on E-Filing for Annual Report
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250