Monmouth Jury Awards $3.2 Million for Shopping Mall Fall
In Cook-Stubbs v. Simon Property Group, a Monmouth County jury awarded $3.22 million on March 8 to a plaintiff who fell on an icy sidewalk at a shopping…
March 21, 2019 at 02:00 PM
4 minute read
In Cook-Stubbs v. Simon Property Group, a Monmouth County jury awarded $3.22 million on March 8 to a plaintiff who fell on an icy sidewalk at a shopping center. But the plaintiff's recovery was reduced to $2.74 million because the jury concluded she should shoulder 15 percent of the fault for the fall.
Terry Cook-Stubbs, now 62, was visiting at the Jackson Premium Outlets in the course of her employment on Jan. 30, 2014, when she slipped and fell on an icy sidewalk and fractured her right hip. She was an employee of Zales Jewelers and was delivering signs to the company's store in the center. Cook-Stubbs underwent surgery to implant three screws in her hip, but she experienced ongoing pain and was unable to return to work. She later had the screws removed and underwent a replacement of the hip joint, the suit claimed.
Cook-Stubbs sued the owner of the center, Jackson Premium Outlets and CPG Partners; Valor Security, and Able Building Maintenance. The suit claimed that Valor Security and Able Building Maintenance were obligated to look out for icy conditions and take action if any were found.
The defendants claimed that Cook-Stubbs' pain and suffering were not caused by her accident but by a pre-existing arthritis condition, according to her attorney, Kimberly Gozsa of Levinson Axelrod in Edison.
Following a 20-day trial before Monmouth County Superior Court Judge Lourdes Lucas, the jury returned a verdict of $2.75 million for pain and suffering, plus $373,580 for lost wages and a $100,000 per quod award to her husband, Harry Stubbs, for a total of $3.22 million. The jury apportioned 51 percent of liability to Jackson Premium Outlets, 16 percent to Valor Security, 18 percent to Able Building Maintenance and 15 percent to the plaintiff. That set Cook-Stubbs' and her husband's recovery at $2.74 million.
Andrew Stern of Fishman McIntyre in East Hanover represented Jackson Premium Outlets, CPG Partners and Valor Security. Richard Connors Jr. of Tompkins McGuire Wachenfeld & Barry in Roseland represented Able Building Maintenance. They did not return calls about the case.
— Charles Toutant
|$724,000 Verdict in Phantom Truck Case
Rubury v. Liberty Mutual: A man whose vehicle was driven off the road by an unidentified tractor-trailer in New Brunswick was awarded a $724,000 verdict on Jan. 17 in an uninsured-motorist claim against his carrier, though the Middlesex County jury's apportionment of 25 percent of the fault to the plaintiff capped the recovery, and the parties settled subsequently.
The net award to plaintiff Frank Rubury, of Sparta, was $543,005.
The verdict consisted of $401,000 in pain and suffering damages and $323,006 in lost wages.
On May 29, 2014, Rubury, 74 at the time, was driving to work when he was driven off the road by a phantom tractor trailer, he claimed. He suffered multiple broken ribs, a displaced sternal fracture and a hemothorax requiring surgery from the incident, according to his attorney Chip Dunne III of Dunne, Dunne & Cohen in Kearny.
Rubury was admitted to Morristown Memorial Hospital, where he stayed for approximately 10 days. He later received treatment for post-concussion syndrome and nerve testing for tremors that had inconclusive results, according to Dunne.
Rubury later entered rehabilitation for another 24 days and was placed on disability for six months. But Dunne said his client was unable to find another job after the accident.
Rubury made a claim for uninsured motorist coverage through Liberty Mutual, with whom he had a $250,000 policy. Liberty made minimal offers prior to trial and claimed possible liability on the part of Rubury, according to Dunne.
The case settled on Jan. 24, one week after the three-day trial concluded in Middlesex County Superior Court, Dunne said, though he declined to disclose the settlement amount.
Brian R. Lehrer of Schenck, Price, Smith and King in the firm's Paramus office represented Liberty Mutual. Lehrer did not return calls about the case.
According to Dunne, Liberty Mutual argued that the plaintiff did not have a recollection of events at the scene of the accident; and had told a cardiologist at Morristown Memorial Center three days after the accident, and a neurologist a year after the accident, that he hadn't slept well the night before the crash and fell asleep behind the wheel. Rubury denied having made those statements to either doctor and claimed Liberty misconstrued what he was saying when he was talking about being knocked unconscious.
— Suzette Parmley
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllTurning the Tables: Defense Litigators Embrace Lawsuits, Alleging Fraud at Plaintiffs Shops
6 minute readTitle Insurance Agency on Hot Seat Over Homebuyer Fees, Alleged Kickbacks
3 minute readNJ Justices Mull Insurer's Duty to Defend Employer's Negligence Claim in Workers' Comp Dispute
6 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Infant Formula Judge Sanctions Kirkland's Jim Hurst: 'Overtly Crossed the Lines'
- 2Abbott, Mead Johnson Win Defense Verdict Over Preemie Infant Formula
- 3Guarantees Are Back, Whether Law Firms Want to Talk About Them or Not
- 4Trump Files $10B Suit Against CBS in Amarillo Federal Court
- 5Preparing Your Law Firm for 2025: Smart Ways to Embrace AI & Other Technologies
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250