The Affordable Housing Crisis Persists
We are in favor of seeing the Legislature become proactive in this area, but nothing would be more counterproductive than a moratorium on efforts to meet the Mount Laurel obligation.
March 22, 2019 at 09:45 PM
2 minute read
A recent article in The Star-Ledger reported that a Bergen County assemblywoman was “… leading the charge against the current affordable housing obligation process” and was asking the Legislature to pass a moratorium on any new housing decisions in order to restore to the Legislature the power to control the development of affordable housing. The article correctly noted that the Supreme Court had ruled years ago (in the Mount Laurel cases) that since the Legislature had failed to address the housing crisis, the judicial system was required to assume responsibility for determining how the several municipalities of New Jersey would provide for low- and moderate-income housing. The court designated three judges, one for the southern portion of the state, another for the central portion, and one for the northern portion, their responsibility being to approve any proposed settlements of litigation involving low- and moderate-income housing. This was done by the Supreme Court with a degree of reluctance, because, as pointed out in the Mount Laurel opinions, it only became involved because the Legislature had failed to carry out its constitutional obligations.
As the years evolved, the Council on Affordable Housing, which had been given the responsibility of determining the fair share obligation of each municipality, failed to carry out its mandate and eventually was terminated. Since that time, a number of suburban municipalities have resolved their obligations in court through the Fair Share Housing Center, described as a “public interest organization.” Apparently, those in the Legislature who support the idea of a moratorium are of the view that such would be the appropriate way to deal with the issue and come up with a workable formula for carrying out the Mount Laurel requirements.
We are in favor of seeing the Legislature become proactive in this area. However, we also believe that nothing would be more counterproductive than a moratorium on efforts to meet the Mount Laurel obligation, even assuming a moratorium could pass constitutional muster. The Legislature should move with vigor in this critically important endeavor, but they should do so forthwith and without causing any delay. The housing crisis in New Jersey is a reality and needs to be addressed now.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllThe Real Estate Consumer Protection Enhancement Act Brings Industry Change
9 minute readTrending Stories
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250