Two Years Into Bail Reform, Pretrial Detention Much Lower, AOC Report Says
In total, New Jersey's pretrial jail population has declined 43.9 percent from December 31, 2015 through the end of 2018, according to the judiciary's report.
April 03, 2019 at 08:51 PM
6 minute read
A revamped bail system has made New Jersey's criminal justice more humane and equitable, while substantially lowering the jail population by cutting the amount of time low-risk defendants spend behind bars while awaiting trial, according to a report by the Administrative Office of the Courts.
The Criminal Justice Reform 2018 Annual Report credits bail changes for ensuring only violent offenders were being held in jail pending trial and for helping to stabilize no-show and recidivism rates with defendants no more likely to commit a new offense or fail to show up for a court appearance than defendants released under the prior system of monetary bail.
The new system, which voters approved in a 2014 constitutional amendment, went into effect Jan. 1, 2017.
Chief Justice Stuart Rabner seized on the report's findings and praised the removal of what he called systemic “inequities” caused by monetary bail.
“New Jersey's criminal justice system has begun to remove inequities created by the heavy reliance on monetary bail,” Rabner said in a statement. “The annual report reveals that Criminal Justice Reform has reduced the unnecessary detention of low-risk defendants, ensured community safety, upheld constitutional principles, and preserved the integrity of the criminal justice system.”
This evolved, said the report, as a result of bail reform where defendants who pose little risk of committing another crime or fleeing from justice but couldn't afford bail, now spend substantially less time in jail before being released pretrial.
The report said time spent behind bars while awaiting trial is down 40 percent, while the use of money bail is now largely relegated to defendants who fail to appear in court or otherwise violate the conditions of pretrial release set by a judge.
The average amount of time defendants spent in jail pretrial in 2014 was 62.4 days; the average time dropped to 37.2 days in 2017, the AOC report said.
The report noted how New Jersey's pretrial jail population has steadily declined since the end of 2015, when Superior and Municipal Courts across the state, along with prosecutors and defense counsel, began reviewing the local pretrial jail population in preparation for criminal justice reform efforts.
It said CJR reduced the disparity between black and white defendants in terms of the amount of time spent in jail from arrest until initial pretrial release, as well as the average number of days spent in jail awaiting trial.
The time in jail for black defendants was reduced by 10.3 days, and time in jail for white defendants was reduced by 5.2 days, the report said.
In total, New Jersey's pretrial jail population has declined 43.9 percent from December 31, 2015 through the end of 2018.
“New Jersey's jail population looks very different today than it did when the idea of reforming the state's criminal justice system first took hold,” said Judge Glenn A. Grant, acting administrative director of the courts, in a statement. “The state's jails now largely include those defendants who present a significant risk of flight or danger to the community.
“Low-risk defendants who lack the financial resources to post bail are now released back into the community without having to suffer the spiraling, life-changing consequences of being detained for weeks and months while presumed innocent,” Grant said.
The report's statistical comparison between the new system implemented in 2017 and the monetary bail system still used in 2014 show recidivism and court appearance rates largely remained steady. It concluded that New Jersey's jail population now consists largely of defendants accused of violent crimes or other serious offenses.
Highlights of the 2018 report included the following points:
- A comparison of the jail population on Oct. 3, 2012, and Oct. 3, 2018, showed there were 6,000 fewer people incarcerated under the new bail system, and half of the decrease were among black defendants, followed by 1,500 fewer whites and 1,300 fewer Hispanic defendants.
- In all of 2018, only 102 defendants were ordered by courts to post monetary bail, out of a total of 44,383 CJR-eligible defendants. Bail was ordered in 90 of those cases for violations of pretrial monitoring.
- The report said the vast majority of defendants were either (a) released on their own recognizance or on conditions that Pretrial Services officers monitored, or (b) ordered detained.
- Fingerprinting rates increased dramatically under CJR, from 30 percent of defendants in 2014, to more than 94 percent of defendants using “Live Scan” last year.
- Under CJR, a substantially larger number of low-risk defendants were released on complaint-summonses, instead of being arrested on complaint-warrants—thanks in part to early screening by prosecutors.
- The report found that In 2017, 71 percent of defendants were released on a summons, pending the disposition of their cases, without first being sent to jail. In 2014, 54 percent of defendants were released on a summons. Under CJR, the county jail population now consists of a larger percentage of high-risk defendants. On Oct. 3, 2018, 47 percent of the pretrial jail population consisted of people charged with at least one violent offense, compared to 35 percent on the same day in 2012.
- Nearly 75 percent of the 2018 jail population consisted of defendants charged with serious offenses.
However, the report stated the racial and ethnic makeup within the jail population has remained largely the same.
Black defendants, for example, still account for 54 percent of the jail population—a number not lost on the judiciary, which plans to examine the effect of bail reform on racial disparity to ensure all defendants are treated equally, said the report, which cited racial disparity among the areas in need of improvement.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllRetiring AOC Director Judge Glenn A. Grant Walks Away From Judiciary 'Tremendously Impressed' by New Jersey's Judges
5 minute readTrending Stories
- 1How Some Elite Law Firms Are Growing Equity Partner Ranks Faster Than Others
- 2Fried Frank Partner Leaves for Paul Hastings to Start Tech Transactions Practice
- 3Stradley Ronon Welcomes Insurance Team From Mintz
- 4Weil Adds Acting Director of SEC Enforcement, Continuing Government Hiring Streak
- 5Monday Newspaper
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250