Suit Claiming Double-Parked UPS Truck Caused Crash Settles for $2 Million in Essex
A motorist who suffered brain and spinal injuries in an accident involving a UPS delivery truck agreed to a $2 million settlement in his Essex county…
April 05, 2019 at 12:19 PM
4 minute read
A motorist who suffered brain and spinal injuries in an accident involving a UPS delivery truck agreed to a $2 million settlement in his Essex county suit, Cuff v. United Parcel Service, on Feb. 13.
Plaintiff Paul Cuff was driving on Mount Prospect Avenue in Newark on Aug. 17, 2011, when his vehicle collided with another car driven by Francis Folassobgoum.
A UPS truck was double-parked in the roadway while its driver made a delivery, prompting Folassobgoum to cross the center line and drive into oncoming traffic, where he collided with Cuff's vehicle head-on, according to the suit.
Cuff sustained spine and brain injuries and was unable to continue in his job as a stationary engineer after the crash, said Elizabeth Boylan of The Maglione Firm in Newark, who represented the plaintiff along with the firm's Dean Maglione. Cuff suffered significant short- and long-term memory loss and a herniation at L5-S1, which necessitated lumbar surgery and ongoing pain management treatment, according to Boylan.
The parties disagreed over the plaintiff's discovery requests about prior crashes involving UPS delivery trucks that were double-parked and about the company's policies about leaving delivery trucks double-parked in the street, Boylan said. UPS did not collect data about crashes involving double-parked vehicles, but plaintiff counsel alleged that the company's practice of paying tickets for drivers who double-park sent the message that the danger of double-parking is the cost of doing business, Boylan said.
The lawyer for UPS, Benjamin Tartaglia III of Mintzer Sarowitz Zeris Ledva & Meyers in Cherry Hill, declined to comment about the case.
— Charles Toutant
|$1.5M Auto Verdict in Ocean
Reckhow v. Gray: In a motor vehicle case tried before Superior Court Judge James Den Uyl, an Ocean County jury awarded $1.5 million on March 15. The total recovery is to be $1.78 million.
The jury rendered a verdict to plaintiff Nicoletta Reckhow for $1.5 million for pain and suffering resulting from injuries she sustained from an accident that occurred in early 2016 in Toms River.
The jury determined that Reckhow's neck and shoulder injuries were caused, and her medical treatment necessitated, by the accident. According to an agreement reached by the parties before trial, because the jury found causation, the court will mold the verdict to include a health insurance lien of $195,408.52, according to Matthew R. Mendelsohn and Adam M. Epstein of Mazie Slater Katz & Freeman in Roseland, counsel to Reckhow.
When $90,901.76 in prejudgment is added, the total recovery is in excess of $1.78 million, they said.
The accident occurred on Jan.18, 2016, when Reckhow, now 62, was traveling northbound from Romana Lane, through the intersection of Route 37, and towards Bananier Drive, in Toms River in her 2011 Honda Accord, the lawyers said.
Reckhow, of Weehawken, was at a complete stop at a red light at the intersection when the light turned green and she began to proceed through the intersection, across Route 37. That's when defendant Natale Gray, traveling eastbound on Route 37 at the same intersection in a 2008 GMC Sierra pickup truck at approximately 60 mph, accelerated and went through the intersection, despite having a red light, according to Mendelsohn.
This resulted ina collision between the front of Gray's truck and the side of Reckhow's vehicle, causing Reckhow's Accord to spin around multiple times and strike the concrete median head-on, Mendelsohn said.
Gray, 21, of Whiting, was represented by Sonya Bright of Marie Carey's law office in Florham Park. Bright did not return a call on the verdict.
Kelly Gray, the defendant's mother, was listed as co-defendant because she owns the GMC Sierra, according to court documents. She was not in the truck at the time of the accident.
Plaintiff Reckhow suffered several bone and rib fractures, including a disc herniation requiring surgery, and rotator cuff tear to her left shoulder from the collision, her lawyers said.
Mendelsohn said due to the injuries and surgeries, his client's right pinky finger no longer bends, preventing her right hand from functioning normally, and she has pain and reduced range of motion in her neck and shoulder.
— Suzette Parmley
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllTurning the Tables: Defense Litigators Embrace Lawsuits, Alleging Fraud at Plaintiffs Shops
6 minute readTitle Insurance Agency on Hot Seat Over Homebuyer Fees, Alleged Kickbacks
3 minute readNJ Justices Mull Insurer's Duty to Defend Employer's Negligence Claim in Workers' Comp Dispute
6 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Infant Formula Judge Sanctions Kirkland's Jim Hurst: 'Overtly Crossed the Lines'
- 2Abbott, Mead Johnson Win Defense Verdict Over Preemie Infant Formula
- 3Guarantees Are Back, Whether Law Firms Want to Talk About Them or Not
- 4Trump Files $10B Suit Against CBS in Amarillo Federal Court
- 5Preparing Your Law Firm for 2025: Smart Ways to Embrace AI & Other Technologies
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250