NJ's Expanding Leave Laws Give Employees More Paid Time Off
A helpful overview of the recent changes to family leave and paid sick leave in the Garden State.
April 11, 2019 at 10:00 AM
9 minute read
New Jersey has been at the forefront of providing paid leave for sick employees and workers caring for ill family members. Recently enacted laws have expanded those leave entitlements. Now, the ability to take sick days or time off to help family members with serious health conditions is broader than ever. This article provides an overview of the recent changes to family leave and paid sick leave in the Garden State.
|Earned Sick Leave
On Oct. 29, 2018, New Jersey enacted the Earned Sick Leave (ESL) Law for all businesses in New Jersey—irrespective of their size. The law provides employees up to 40 hours of fully-paid sick leave each year and covers all employees—full-time or part-time—who work in New Jersey, except for per diem hospital or health-care employees; construction industry employees governed by a collective bargaining agreement; or public employees who already get sick leave with full pay pursuant to any other law.
Approved Reasons for ESL
Employees can use ESL for the following reasons:
- Caring for their own, or a family member's, physical or mental health or injury;
- Addressing domestic or sexual violence against themselves or a family member, including preparation for or attendance at court proceedings, treatment or counseling;
- Attending a child's school-related meeting, conference, or event;
- Taking care of their children when school or child care is closed due to an epidemic or public health emergency.
As is evident from the list of approved reasons, ESL covers more than an employee's own sickness. ESL also broadly defines family member to include: biological, adopted, foster and stepchildren, adult children; a legal ward; child of a domestic partner or civil union partner; grandchildren; siblings; spouse; domestic partner or civil union partner; parents; grandparents; a spouse, domestic partner or civil union partner of an employee's parent or grandparent; the sibling of an employee's spouse, domestic partner or civil union partner; or any individual related by blood to the employee or whose close association is the equivalent of family.
Accrual, Use and Carry Over of ESL
Earned sick leave hours accrue at the rate of one hour for every 30 hours worked. Employees can accrue and use up to 40 hours of ESL in any benefit year and must be able to carry over up to 40 hours of any unused ESL into the next benefit year.
ESL for existing employees could be used beginning on Feb. 26, 2019, or 120 days after the ESL Law was enacted on Oct. 29, 2018. For employees hired after Oct. 29, 2018, ESL can be used 120 days after the employee commences employment. If an employee is terminated but is rehired within six months, an employer must reinstate the employee's previous ESL, and the employee must be able to immediately use it. If an employee resigns, retires, is terminated or otherwise separated, unused ESL does not have to be paid to the employee.
Paying Employees for ESL
Employers must pay employees for ESL at the same rate of pay as the employee normally earns. However, if any employee takes ESL during scheduled overtime, employers are not required to pay the overtime rate. Notably, hours of ESL count toward employees' hours worked for purposes of determining when employees must be paid overtime. An employer may not require employees to make up the hours missed for ESL, but employees may voluntarily choose to work additional hours or shifts. Also, employees taking ESL may not be made to find a replacement for a missed shift.
Notice and Documentation of ESL
If an employee's leave is foreseeable, an employer can require notice up to seven calendar days prior to the date leave is to begin. Foreseeable leave includes time off that an employee knows in advance, such as a scheduled doctor's visit or school meeting, or a regularly occurring medical or counseling treatment. If the leave is not foreseeable, an employer may require an employee to give notice of the intention to take leave as soon as practicable, which cannot and should not be limited to any set time frame. Employees must be notified of the necessity to provide notice and the mechanisms for doing so.
Employers generally cannot request evidence of ESL. There are only two permissible circumstances when employers may request reasonable documentation:
- If an employee requests ESL for three or more consecutive days.
- If an employee takes unforeseeable ESL on a verifiable high-volume day or special event, when permitting use of foreseeable leave would unduly disrupt the operations of the employer. The employer must provide reasonable advance notice of these dates.
Reasonable documentation varies depending on the reason for the ESL. Examples of reasonable documentation include a letter signed by a health-care professional who is treating the employee or the family member, an attorney or law enforcement agency report or record, a court order, or any tangible proof of a school-related conference or meeting.
ESL records must be kept by employers for five years and must include the hours worked by employees and the ESL accrued, advanced, used, paid, and the unused ESL that is paid out or carried over. If records are not kept, there is a presumption that the law has been violated absent clear and convincing evidence to the contrary.
Retaliation
The law contains a rebuttable presumption of retaliation whenever an employer takes an adverse employment action within 90 days of the employee:
- Filing a complaint with the Department of Labor (DOL) or a court;
- Informing any person about an employer's alleged violation of this law;
- Cooperating with the DOL or other persons in the investigation or prosecution of any alleged violations of the law;
- Opposing any policy, practice or act that is prohibited; or
- Informing any person of his or her rights under the law.
NJ Family Leave Changes
On Feb. 19, 2019, New Jersey significantly expanded New Jersey's Family Leave Act (FLA), which provides employees with 12 weeks of unpaid job-protected leave to care for family members with serious health conditions. The FLA originally took effect approximately 10 years ago on July 1, 2009, and made New Jersey the third state program in the country to mandate job-protected family leave. The new amendments, which become effective on June 30, 2019, provide even greater benefits for a broader group of employees in New Jersey. Below are some of the key expansions:
- Employer Size: The FLA originally applied to employers with 50 or more employees. The recent amendments will expand FLA to any employer with 30 or more employees.
- Enlarged Definitions: Under the recent amendments to the FLA, the definition of “family members” is expanded to include siblings, grandparents, grandchildren, parents-in-law, domestic partners, any individuals related to the employee by blood, and even more broadly, “any other individual that the employee shows to have a close association with the employee which is the equivalent of a family relationship.” Previously, a “family member” only included a child, parent, spouse, or partner in a civil union couple. The definition of a “parent” was also broadened to include foster parents and those who became parents via a gestational carrier.
- Shortened Advance Notice Required: The FLA originally required advance notice of 30 days for all leave requests. The new notice requirement is reduced to 15 days for intermittent leave requests to care for a family member with a serious health condition.
Paid Family Leave Amendments
On Feb. 19, 2019, New Jersey also expanded New Jersey's Family Leave Insurance Law (FLI), which provides pay to employees for qualifying family leaves. The FLI amendments become effective on July 1, 2020. Here is a summary of the key changes:
- Paid-Leave Increase: Under the original FLI, employees could take up to six weeks, or 42 intermittent days, of paid leave to care for a child during the first 12 months after birth or adoption or to care for a family member with a serious health condition. With the amendments, paid leave under the FLI is increased to 12 weeks of consecutive leave or 56 days of intermittent leave.
- Weekly Paid-Leave Benefit Increase: The amendments also increase the maximum pay during FLI leave from 66.6 percent to 85 percent of an employee's weekly salary, up to a maximum of 70 percent of the statewide average weekly wage (also increased from 53 percent of the average weekly wage). These increases result in a maximum weekly benefit of $860, instead of the previous $633 cap.
- Inclusion of NJ SAFE Act: Employees will also be eligible to take paid FLI leave under the New Jersey Security and Financial Empowerment Act (NJ SAFE Act) to care for any “family member” involved in a domestic violence or sexually violent incident.
- Use of PTO: The amendments will prohibit employers from requiring employees to use up to two weeks of paid time off (PTO) in lieu of FLI benefits. If an employee elects to use PTO for a leave qualifying for FLI, that employee is still entitled to the full leave benefits available under the FLI after the PTO election is exhausted.
Conclusion
Employers should take heed and ensure employment policies, handbooks and employment agreements have been updated to comply with these changes. Verify that all employee notices have been properly issued and posters correctly displayed. If you have any questions about the new laws, or are uncertain as to whether any existing policies need or should be updated, speak with your employment counsel.
Wendy Johnson Lario is a shareholder with Greenberg Traurig in Florham Park. She chairs the firm's New Jersey Labor & Employment Practice. Courteney Caine and Danielle Gonnella are associates at the firm, representing employers and managers in employment disputes.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View All'I've Worked Until 2 in the Morning': Lawyers Brace for Trump Policy
6 minute readGOP Trifecta in Washington Could Put Litigation Finance Industry Under Pressure
Lowenstein Hires Ex-FTX US General Counsel Ryne Miller to Lead Its Commodities, Derivatives Practice
3 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Commentary: James Madison, Meet Matt Gaetz
- 2The Narcissist’s Dilemma: Balancing Power and Inadequacy in Family Law
- 3Leopard Solutions Launches AI Navigator, a Gen AI Search, Data Extraction Tool
- 4Trump's SEC Likely to Halt 'Off-Channel' Texting Probe That's Led to Billions in Fines
- 5Special Section: Products Liability, Mass Torts & Class Action/Personal Injury
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250