In Praise of Gun Buy-back Programs
We applaud the effort to get guns off the streets and we applaud the attorneys, businesses and citizens who have made contributions to support these programs.
April 14, 2019 at 10:00 AM
2 minute read
sundrawalex / iStockphoto.com
Irrespective of one's position on the meaning and scope of the Second Amendment, attorneys and citizens of New Jersey should endorse the gun “buy back” program being developed and implemented by county prosecutors, and in Essex County jointly by the Bar Foundation and the County Prosecutor's Office. Although legislation was passed by both the Senate and Assembly in early January 2018 to establish a gun “buy back” program through the Office of the Attorney General, that legislation was opposed for a number of reasons, including objection to the use of taxpayer money or tax incentives to fund an effort that includes the purchase of firearms illegally possessed. The legislation resulted in a pocket veto at the end of the legislative session.
Nevertheless, county prosecutors, knowing the dangers and concerns related to the possession of firearms, have initiated such programs. One was conducted by the Hudson County prosecutor last fall, with the economic support of a medical center, and the Essex County Bar Foundation raised $75,000 from attorneys and law firms to fund the purchase of the firearms in the amount of up to $250 each. During a recent buy-back day in Newark, individuals were able to “sell” up to three guns each at a church in Newark, with no questions asked, and with no adverse consequences to anybody who turned in a gun.
We applaud the effort to get guns off the streets where they may be used illegally or cause injury by accident. And we applaud the attorneys, businesses and citizens who have made contributions to support these programs. We hope the effort will be expanded with support of the bar.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View All![High-Speed Crash With Police Vehicle Nets $1.6 Million Settlement High-Speed Crash With Police Vehicle Nets $1.6 Million Settlement](https://images.law.com/cdn-cgi/image/format=auto,fit=contain/https://images.law.com/njlawjournal/contrib/content/uploads/sites/404/2022/06/Police-Car-Lights-767x633.jpg)
![$19.1M Verdict: 'Most Accurate Settlement Demand I Ever Made' $19.1M Verdict: 'Most Accurate Settlement Demand I Ever Made'](https://images.law.com/cdn-cgi/image/format=auto,fit=contain/https://k2-prod-alm.s3.us-east-1.amazonaws.com/brightspot/59/f1/40ee68e24dc3bfda5780ae72a445/new-jersey-state-police-car-767x633.jpg)
![Judge in AGs' Suit Set to Block 'Chaotic' Trump Funding Freeze Judge in AGs' Suit Set to Block 'Chaotic' Trump Funding Freeze](https://images.law.com/cdn-cgi/image/format=auto,fit=contain/https://k2-prod-alm.s3.us-east-1.amazonaws.com/brightspot/07/3b/f5ca989c4c78b88ca04717405e37/us-district-court-district-of-rhode-island-767x633.jpg)
Trending Stories
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250