Former Hertz Execs Named in NJ Clawback Suit After SEC Probe
In February, Hertz sent letters to the defendants demanding they return their incentive and severance payments, totaling $70 million, and then brought suit in U.S. District Court for the District of New Jersey,
April 16, 2019 at 09:00 AM
4 minute read
The original version of this story was published on Corporate Counsel
In an exceptionally rare clawback case, The Hertz Corp. has sued its former general counsel, Jeffrey Zimmerman, and two other top executives in New Jersey federal court to recover over $70 million the company says it paid them in incentive pay and a “golden parachute” severance package, plus over $200 million in legal fees and other costs related to misstating company income.
Hertz does not accuse Zimmerman of doing anything illegal, but the complaint alleges he “failed to stop, effectively counterbalance, or otherwise offset or report to Hertz's board of directors” about actions of former CEO Mark Frissora, which led to serious accounting misconduct. Frissora is a co-defendant in the suit, along with then-chief financial officer Elyse Douglas.
The suit states, “As general counsel and chief compliance officer, Zimmerman was responsible for ensuring the accuracy and completeness of disclosures to stockholders and the public.”
Zimmerman's failure to stop or report Frissora was a breach of his duty owed to Hertz, the suit says. Zimmerman's attorney, Vincent Connelly of the Chicago office of Mayer Brown, declined to comment. Zimmerman, who served as general counsel from December 2007 until he resigned in December 2014, couldn't be reached for comment.
While the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission has brought a few clawback cases against executives, one brought by a corporation is very rare. In fact, Hertz attorney Herbert Beigel said he knows of no other case quite like it. Beyond that, Beigel, who owns Herbert Beigel & Associates in Tucson, Arizona, says the complaint speaks for itself.
Hertz, previously based in Park Ridge, moved its headquarters to Estero, Florida, after the 2012 acquisition of the Dollar Thrifty Automotive Group.
The facts of the case stretch back to 2011 and into 2013, a three-year period when then CEO-Frissora allegedly “displayed a management style and temperament that created a pressurized operating environment at the company … [which] led to inappropriate accounting decisions and the failure to disclose information critical to an effective review of Hertz's finances,” the suit states.
Frissora allegedly demanded “paradigm-busting accounting.”
As an example of Zimmerman's knowledge, the suit says “during the January 2013 close, Frissora urged Zimmerman to conduct a granular review of the legal reserves to help the company 'bridge the gap' for year-end results. Then, in September 2013, Frissora again urged Zimmerman to review legal reserves.”
The suit states, “Defendants' wrongful 'tone at the top' was a form of misconduct and gross negligence because it exacerbated various risk factors,” and led to inadequate internal controls and “a plethora of accounting errors.”
Eventually Hertz, which is headquartered in Estero, Florida, was forced to restate three years worth of income. All three defendants resigned under pressure and received multimillion-dollar severance packages.
According to the suit, Zimmerman's golden parachute included, among other things, a series of lump-sum payments, the retention of certain incentive-based equity awards, eligibility for 92.9 percent of his 2014 bonus and the continued use of certain perquisites, such as insurance coverage.
Last December the company agreed to pay $16 million to settle a case brought by SEC for materially misstating its income by some $235 million.
In February, after an internal investigation and settlement with the SEC, Hertz sent letters to the defendants demanding they return their incentive and severance payments, totaling $70 million. When they did not do so, Hertz brought suit March 25 in U.S. District Court for the District of New Jersey, alleging they were in breach of the company's clawback policy.
Hertz also accused them of breaching their severance agreements by misstating that they had not engaged in “willful gross neglect” or “willful gross misconduct.”
The suit says Frissora and Zimmerman also “represented in those agreements that they had not facilitated … and ha[ve] no knowledge of, any financial or accounting improprieties or irregularities within Hertz.”
Hertz cites as damages the $70 million in incentive and severance pay, and over $200 million in investigative, legal and remediation costs, including the SEC penalty. The legal costs include defending the company against several lawsuits brought after the income restatement.
Hertz also seeks a declaratory judgment that the defendants are not entitled to have their own attorneys' fees paid by the company for this litigation.
Meanwhile, the defendants have filed their own action in Delaware Chancery Court, asking that the court order Hertz to pay their attorneys' fees. That action is expected to be heard first, in May.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View All$945K Settlement Reached in Fatal Crash After Truck Driver Fell Asleep at Wheel
3 minute read'That's Insane': Lawyers Weigh In on Fallout From Uber's User Agreement
7 minute readNY's Top Court Mulls Fate of Personal Injury Claims Against NJ Transit Corp.
Class Action Claims Charter Bus Company Conducted Mass Layoff in Violation State, Federal WARN Acts
3 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Trump's Return to the White House: The Legal Industry Reacts
- 2Infant Formula Judge Sanctions Kirkland's Jim Hurst: 'Overtly Crossed the Lines'
- 3Climate Disputes, International Arbitration, and State Court Limitations for Global Issues
- 4Election 2024: Nationwide Judicial Races and Ballot Measures to Watch
- 5Judicial Face-Off: Navigating the Ethical and Efficient Use of AI in Legal Practice [CLE Pending]
- 6How Much Does the Frequency of Retirement Withdrawals Matter?
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.