Jury Convicts Lawyer and Ocean County GOP Chairman on Some Charges, Acquits on Others
The verdict marks the end of a two-and-a-half-week trial in Trenton for George Gilmore, an equity partner at Gilmore & Monahan in Toms River and longtime chairman of the Ocean County Republican Organization.
April 17, 2019 at 04:04 PM
3 minute read
A federal jury has convicted an Ocean County lawyer and prominent politico of failing to pay payroll taxes to the IRS and making false statements on a bank loan application, the U.S. Attorney's Office in New Jersey announced Wednesday.
But George Gilmore, 69, of Toms River, was acquitted on other charges.
He was charged last January in a six-count indictment with one count of income tax evasion for calendar years 2013, 2014 and 2015; two counts of filing false tax returns for calendar years 2013 and 2014; failing to collect, account for, and pay over payroll taxes for two quarters in 2016; and making false statements on a 2015 loan application submitted to Ocean First Bank.
Gilmore, an equity partner at Gilmore & Monahan in Toms River, was in charge of the firm's finances as well as his spouse's and his own taxes from the relevant time frame of 2013 to 2016, according to prosecutors.
He is also the longtime chairman of the Ocean County Republican Organization.
According to First Assistant U.S. Attorney Rachael A. Honig, Gilmore was convicted on two counts of failing to pay IRS payroll taxes withheld from his firm's employees and one count of making false statements on the loan application. However, he was acquitted of two counts of filing false tax returns for 2013 and 2014. Honig also said the jury could not reach a unanimous verdict on one count of income tax evasion from 2013 to 2015.
The verdict marks the end of a two-and-a-half-week trial in Trenton before U.S. District Judge Anne E. Thompson of the District of New Jersey.
Kevin Marino of Marino Tortorella & Boyle in Chatham represents Gilmore and called the government's case an “abysmal failure.”
“We are pleased that the jury rejected the heart of the government's case: that George Gilmore evaded the payment of taxes and understated his income by characterizing monies he borrowed from his law firm as shareholder loans,” Marino said.
“Mr. Gilmore's straight acquittal on tax evasion charges, coupled with the jury's inability to reach a verdict on the evasion of payment count, signaled a complete rejection of the government's animating premise in this case, and a stinging rebuke of its overcharged, misguided prosecution,” Marino added.
A U.S. Attorney's Office spokesman declined to respond to Marino's comments.
Gilmore was accused of withholding employees' taxes from their checks, but failing to pay over in full the payroll taxes due to the IRS. Prosecutors also alleged that he filed a false loan application to obtain refinancing of a mortgage loan for $1.5 million with a “cash out” provision that provided Gilmore would obtain cash from the loan. Gilmore allegedly received $572,000 from the cash-out portion of the loan, but did not report the income to the IRS.
According to Honig, the two counts of failing pay over payroll taxes each carry a maximum penalty of five years in prison, and a $250,000 fine, or twice the gross gain or loss from the offense. The single count of loan application fraud carries a maximum penalty of 30 years in prison along with a $1 million fine.
Gilmore is scheduled to be sentenced on July 23.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllPharma Giants File Patent Infringement Suit Against India-Based Drugmaker Over IBS Medication
3 minute read'Sad That We Have to Do This': Senate Judiciary Passes Bill Temporarily Addressing Public Notice Crisis
3 minute readAmazon's Audible Hit With Privacy Class Action Over Use of Tracking Pixels
Trending Stories
- 1Attorney Claims He Was Denied Firearm Carry Permit Because of His Views on Middle East Conflict
- 2Judges’ ‘Unretirements’ After Trump's Win Spark Dubious Ethics Complaints
- 3High Court Revives Kleinbard's Bit to Collect $70K in Legal Fees From Lancaster DA
- 4AG Had No Authority to Take Control of Paterson PD, Appellate Division Says
- 5Deviation From Shared Custody Guidelines Requires More Than Common Sense
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250