Reaping the Benefits of Mentorship
A mentor can give you an unbiased opinion and a fresh perspective, and push you toward reaching your goals in a more strategic fashion.
April 22, 2019 at 08:30 AM
4 minute read
Young attorneys are being pushed by bar associations, alumni organizations, and other professional groups to sign up for mentorship programs. Although the barrage of emails urging you to sign up for these programs are about as appealing as the links to dating websites your mom keeps sending over, finding a mentor is a useful endeavor. Whether you are a solo-practitioner, an attorney at a large firm, or working in the public sector, you will face many challenges your formal education did not prepare you for. A mentor can give you an unbiased opinion and a fresh perspective, and push you toward reaching your goals in a more strategic fashion.
Mentorships can provide a sense of confidence when a more experienced attorney reassures you that you are, in fact, capable. Your mentor may also help steer you away from a potential pitfall you were not even aware was on the horizon. Insider tips that pertain to your specialty area of law, office politics, or how to navigate your local court can only be gained from experience or a short-cut: mentorship.
|How to Get a Mentor
Understandably, the first place one might seek a mentor is at the office, but, it can be beneficial to seek a mentor that is outside of your place of work. It can be awkward to ask your colleagues for career advice. But, there is certainly no reason to limit yourself to merely one mentor, given that you may have more than one goal.
Most young attorneys seek out informal mentorships through their local bar association. County bar associations have committees devoted to specific areas of law, and by joining the committee you will have the opportunity to meet attorneys who you can begin to establish a rapport with that leads to an informal mentorship. Bar associations often offer many opportunities to socialize in less formal settings as well, where you can develop a relationship that may lead to a meaningful mentorship.
If you are looking for something more structured, the New Jersey State Bar Association has a relatively new mentorship program, Mentor Match, which includes an online database where you can find your next mentor. NJSBA President, John E. Keefe Jr., explains the purpose of the program is “to provide mentorship for new lawyers, those looking to change specialties or who are in a state of transition, and those who work alone or in a small practice without a stable of colleagues who work just down the hall and are easily available for quick consultations.” The New Jersey State Bar Association is devoted to making this program work by calling each mentee who signs up for the program to make sure the perfect match is made. Some attorneys have found a formal mentorship to be more successful because the purpose and boundaries of the relationship are clear and the timeframe is limited.
Mentorship is not one of those things where less is more. If one mentor is good, having several mentors is better. It is helpful to develop a mentor-mentee relationship with someone who is a bit older and someone much older, someone of the same sex and someone of the opposite sex, and people who have a similar career path as your own as well as someone who has done things very differently. The more people you can reach out to for advice when you are struggling to know what to do next, the better.
|Getting the Most out of Your Mentor-Mentee Relationship
Whether you seek out a formal or informal mentorship, you are going to need to put in some work to reap any benefits from the relationship. As a mentee, you should identify your goals, know what challenges you are facing, and be prepared to receive and act on the advice you get from your mentor. The practice of law can be stressful, but by developing one or more mentoring relationships, you can be assured you will gain a sense of personal and professional satisfaction whether you are a mentor or mentee.
The NJLJ Young Lawyers Advisory Board is a diverse group of young attorneys from around the state. Follow them on Twitter, @YoungLawyersNJL.
|This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllAppellate Division Greenlights State Bar's Leadership Diversity Initiatives
5 minute readFor Lawyers, the 'Work' of Making an Impact Does Not Have to Happen in a Courtroom. Laura E. Sedlak Says
Doing the Right Thing in the Pursuit of Justice Requires Guts, Says Lyndsay Ruotolo
Trending Stories
- 1Decision of the Day: Judge Reduces $287M Jury Verdict Against Harley-Davidson in Wrongful Death Suit
- 2Kirkland to Covington: 2024's International Chart Toppers and Award Winners
- 3Decision of the Day: Judge Denies Summary Judgment Motions in Suit by Runner Injured in Brooklyn Bridge Park
- 4KISS, Profit Motive and Foreign Currency Contracts
- 512 Days of … Web Analytics
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250