Rutgers Exchange Student Struck While Jogging Settles for $1.4 Million
A woman struck by a vehicle in a crosswalk while she was a student at Rutgers University settled her Middlesex County suit for $1.4 million on March…
April 26, 2019 at 10:00 AM
4 minute read
A woman struck by a vehicle in a crosswalk while she was a student at Rutgers University settled her Middlesex County suit for $1.4 million on March 28.
On the morning of Sept. 14, 2016, plaintiff Ziyue Xia, an exchange student from China, was jogging from the university's Busch Campus in Piscataway, along the John Lynch Bridge that brings Route 18 over the Raritan River, to Buccleuch Park in New Brunswick. She followed a jogging path along the bridge and, on the New Brunswick side, jogged through a crosswalk where the path led to the park, according to her attorney, Nicholas Leonardis of Stathis & Leonardis in Edison.
While she was in the crosswalk, a motorist driving on George Street, defendant Sanford Becker, struck her with the front passenger's side of the vehicle, and Xia was thrown over the vehicle.
Becker contended that he didn't see Xia, at least in part because of glare from the sun that morning, said his attorney, Jason Winkler of Winter and Winkler in Florham Park, who confirmed the settlement.
Xia, then 18, sustained a head laceration, subdural hematoma and traumatic brain injury, was hospitalized for 13 days, and returned to China to recover. She received neurological treatment in China before returning to Rutgers in January 2017, Leonardis said.
The suit claimed Xia was able to maintain her 3.9 grade-point average, but had to spend more time on her work because of concentration and memory issues associated with the brain injury.
Xia alleged that Becker was negligent
The parties were through discovery and approaching a May trial date when they settled on March 28. The $1.4 million sum came from a $500,000 auto policy and a $1 million umbrella policy, both through Fitchburg Mutual of Massachusetts.
— David Gialanella
|$850K for Mall Parking Lot Strike
Hunter v. Crisdel Group: A Monmouth County case brought by a woman struck by a vehicle while walking through a mall parking lot settled for $850,000 on Jan. 24.
On March 11, 2016, plaintiff Marjorie Hunter of Toms River, then 49 years old, was walking in the Ocean County Mall parking lot when she was struck by defendant, Timothy Corapi, 39, a field supervisor for South Plainfield-based Crisdel Group Construction as he was making a left turn out of the lot in a white 2011 Ford F-150 truck.
The suit claimed Corapi, also from Toms River, became distracted by activity at a nearby tower and thus failed to notice Hunter as she was walking. Corapi's truck struck Hunter as he made a left turn out of one of the aisles, knocking her to the ground. As a result, Hunter struck her head on the pavement, and suffered a laceration and concussion. She was treated at Ocean County Medical Center that same day and had a CT of the brain, according to her attorney, Michael J. Hanus of Hanus & Parsons in Middletown.
Joseph A. Reardon of Leary, Bride, Tinker & Moran in Cedar Knolls, who represented Crisdel Group, Corapi's employer, didn't return a call about the case.
The parties settled on Jan. 24. At the time, a Jan. 14 trial date had recently been postponed.
Hanus, who took over the case from another attorney, said the CT scan on Hunter revealed an acute brain hemorrhage in her right frontal lobe. She also suffered neck and back injuries, she claimed.
Hanus said Hunter experienced concussions and cognitive issues after the accident, such as short-term memory loss and difficulty with words. She was later treated by a neuropsychologist. Hunter also received chiropractic treatment for a herniated disc.
Hunter continued to have some short-term memory loss and cognitive issues, but continued to work as a self-employed preschool owner, according to Hanus.
“She can only engage in short meetings and conversations before she begins to experience memory issues,” Hanus said by phone. He said Hunter also continued to have complications in her daily life, with mood changes and neck and back pain.
Travelers, the carrier for Crisdel, is paying the $850,000 settlement, according to Hanus.
— Suzette Parmley
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllAmid Growing Litigation Volume, Don't Expect UnitedHealthcare to Change Its Stripes After CEO's Killing
6 minute readJudge Approves $667K Settlement Against Independence Blue Cross for Unpaid, Pre-Shift Computer Work
4 minute readTurning the Tables: Defense Litigators Embrace Lawsuits, Alleging Fraud at Plaintiffs Shops
6 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Top Five Florida Verdicts of 2024
- 2The Evolution of a Virtual Court System
- 3New Acquitted Conduct Guideline: An Analysis
- 4Considering the Implications of the 2024 Presidential Election for Jurors in White Collar Cases
- 52024 in Review: Judges Met Out Punishments for Ex-Apple, FDIC, Moody's Legal Leaders
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250