Crop of ADA Suits Say Corporate Websites Are Unfriendly to Blind Users
Burlington Coat Factory, Wyndham Hotels and Forever 21 are among the latest companies to be hit with ADA lawsuits.
April 30, 2019 at 03:51 PM
3 minute read
A frequent filer is going after a half-dozen companies claiming their websites are not accessible to blind and visually impaired people in violations of the Americans with Disabilities Act.
Burlington Coat Factory and Wyndham Hotels were hit with lawsuits Monday in the District of New Jersey, and similar suits were filed on Sunday against True Religion Apparel and Forever 21 in the District of Delaware. Steve Madden Handbags Inc. in the Eastern District of New York and Jimmy Choo USA in the Southern District of New York were also hit with similar lawsuits on April 16.
The plaintiff in all six suits is Jack Kang, a blind man from Los Angeles County, California. He claims the defendants' websites aren't compatible with software that helps visually impaired people read website content. Kang is represented in the suits by lawyers from Legal Justice Advocates, a Washington firm that brings ADA suits.
Suits claiming websites violate the ADA have been experiencing an uptick recently, with at least 2,258 filed in 2018, up from 814 in 2017, according to the law firm Seyfarth Shaw.
Even Beyonce's website was sued in the Southern District of New York for failing to accommodate blind and visually impaired users. The suit over www.Beyonce.com was voluntarily dismissed April 9, “without costs, disbursements or attorneys' fees to either party as against the other,” according to a notice of dismissal.
The suits filed by Kang seek to enjoin defendants from further violations of the ADA and to require them to take steps to make their websites accessible to blind and visually impaired people.
According to the complaints, Kang uses a program called ChromeVox to access the internet, but defendants' websites mount barriers to access with that program. Those barriers include a lack of alternate text, which is an invisible code embedded under an image on a website that is read by the screen-reading software when a blind user's mouse moves over the image.
The barriers to access found on defendants' websites also include empty links that contain no text, causing the function or purpose of the link not to be presented to the user, or linked images missing alternate text.
The defendants' websites would be compatible with ChromeVox if their design followed version 2.0 of the Web Content Accessibility Guidelines from the World Wide Web Consortium, the international website standards organization, the lawsuits claim.
The suits also seek attorney fees and expenses, prejudgment interest and costs of suit, along with any other relief the court deems proper.
Stamatios Stamoulis of Stamoulis & Weinblatt in Wilmington, Delaware, filed the suits along with Yvette Harrell and Evan Kagan of Legal Justice Advocates in Washington. Harrell is Stamoulis' co-counsel in the New Jersey suits and Kagan is his co-counsel in the New York and Delaware cases.
Stamoulis, Kagan and Harrell did not return calls about the lawsuits. The defendants also did not respond to requests for comment.
Burlington, with headquarters in Burlington, New Jersey, operates more than 600 off-price department stores in 45 states. Wyndham, based in Parsippany, New Jersey, operates 9,000 hotels under 20 names that include Ramada, Super 8, La Quinta, Howard Johnson and Travelodge.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllNJ Receiving $1.3M From Marriott Cybersecurity Settlement
The House Wins: Casinos Are Defeating Suits Over Algorithms and Room Rates
4 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Advising 'Capital-Intensive Spaces' Fuels Corporate Practice Growth For Haynes and Boone
- 2Big Law’s Year—as Told in Commentaries
- 3Pa. Hospital Agrees to $16M Settlement Following High Schooler's Improper Discharge
- 4Connecticut Movers: Year-End Promotions, Hires and an Office Opening
- 5Luigi Mangione Defense Attorney Says NYC Mayor’s Comments on Case Raise Fair Trial Concerns
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250