NJ Solar Company Accused of Racism in Fired Workers' Federal Suit
Former employees of Momentum Solar accused the New Jersey-based energy company of firing them for complaining about racism at the New York warehouse—allegations that the company is denying.
May 07, 2019 at 03:00 PM
4 minute read
The original version of this story was published on New York Law Journal
Former employees of Momentum Solar on Monday accused the New Jersey-based energy company in a federal lawsuit of racial discrimination and retaliation, saying they had been fired after complaining about racism at the firm's New York warehouse.
In a complaint filed Monday in the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of New York, six black workers alleged that white supervisors at the warehouse regularly used racial slurs and directed other insults at minorities who worked there. When the plaintiffs complained about their treatment, they were soon fired, leaving just two black workers employed at the New York office, the filing said.
“Rather than occurring sporadically, acts of vile racism occurred on a near-daily basis and were part and parcel to the culture of Momentum's [New York] operations,” Wigdor LLP attorneys Michael J. Willemin and Tanvir H. Rahman said in a statement announcing the lawsuit.
“As alleged in the complaint, Momentum treated its black employees as second-class citizens—it is time for Momentum to be held accountable for that,” they said.
Momentum on Monday denied any wrongdoing, saying that the claims asserted against the company had “no basis in law or fact.”
“The six disgruntled former hourly employees were terminated for legitimate, non-discriminatory reasons including unacceptable workplace behavior, fighting, poor performance, failure to show up for work and violations of material company policies and procedures,” Momentum said in a statement. “The company intends to vigorously defend all claims.”
The proposed class action lawsuit targeted one of the nation's fastest-growing clean energy companies, which last year received a $7.2 million tax credit from the state of New Jersey and more recently secured a $4.1 million investment from New Orleans-based venture capital firm Advantage Capital, according to the complaint.
The plaintiffs said that in addition to “racial hostility,” Momentum paid black workers less than their racial counterparts and often assigned black employees less desirable jobs than their white counterparts.
The complaint cited a recorded conversation in which Adam Murawski, a former foreman who managed the plaintiffs, admitted to plaintiff Garreth Murrell that he had used the N-word on multiple occasions. However, the filing alleged that neither Momentum nor the warehouse's head of operations, Jessica Adams, took any disciplinary action. Murrell said he was fired from the company the following day.
After the interaction, Murawski told his white colleagues, “can you believe he thought he could make a complaint against me,” the complaint said.
The filing also cited other incidents where foremen and white workers at the warehouse made racists comments and referred to crews that included black workers as the “nigga crew.”
“As a result of defendants' discriminatory and retaliatory conduct, there are now only two black employees out of the approximately 40 individuals who work out of the New York office as foremen and installer,” the complaint said. “None of the foremen are black.”
The filing also alleged violations of federal and state wage laws, including requiring employees to work off-the-clock and failing to reimburse workers for the costs of tools needed to perform their jobs.
According to the lawsuit, Murrell planned to file a charge of discrimination with the federal Equal Employment Opportunity Commission and would later amend the complaint to include violations of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act, which bars workplace discrimination on the basis of sex, race, color, national origin and religion.
The case, captioned Murrell v. Pro Custom Solar, has not yet been assigned to a judge.
An online docket-tracking service on Monday did not list counsel for Momentum.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View All![Environmental Protection Litigation Should Be In The State Courts Environmental Protection Litigation Should Be In The State Courts](https://images.law.com/cdn-cgi/image/format=auto,fit=contain/https://k2-prod-alm.s3.us-east-1.amazonaws.com/brightspot/4f/02/9f3ad86a47d891f992b5e399933f/emissions-767x633.jpg)
![Wind Energy Could Be Bad for the Health, Federal Lawsuit Claims Wind Energy Could Be Bad for the Health, Federal Lawsuit Claims](https://images.law.com/cdn-cgi/image/format=auto,fit=contain/https://images.law.com/contrib/content/uploads/sites/399/2024/09/AdobeStock_275880750-767x633.jpg)
![Law Firm Faces Libel Suit After Reposting News Article About Its Case Law Firm Faces Libel Suit After Reposting News Article About Its Case](https://images.law.com/cdn-cgi/image/format=auto,fit=contain/https://images.law.com/contrib/content/uploads/sites/399/2024/07/Javerbaum-Sign-767x633.jpg)
![States Push to Declare Climate Lawsuits By NJ, Others Unconstitutional States Push to Declare Climate Lawsuits By NJ, Others Unconstitutional](https://images.law.com/cdn-cgi/image/format=auto,fit=contain/https://images.law.com/contrib/content/uploads/sites/399/2024/05/gas-pump-767x633.jpg)
Trending Stories
- 1Rejuvenation of a Sharp Employer Non-Compete Tool: Delaware Supreme Court Reinvigorates the Employee Choice Doctrine
- 2Mastering Litigation in New York’s Commercial Division Part V, Leave It to the Experts: Expert Discovery in the New York Commercial Division
- 3GOP-Led SEC Tightens Control Over Enforcement Investigations, Lawyers Say
- 4Transgender Care Fight Targets More Adults as Georgia, Other States Weigh Laws
- 5Roundup Special Master's Report Recommends Lead Counsel Get $0 in Common Benefit Fees
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250