NJ Solar Company Accused of Racism in Fired Workers' Federal Suit
Former employees of Momentum Solar accused the New Jersey-based energy company of firing them for complaining about racism at the New York warehouse—allegations that the company is denying.
May 07, 2019 at 03:00 PM
4 minute read
The original version of this story was published on New York Law Journal
Former employees of Momentum Solar on Monday accused the New Jersey-based energy company in a federal lawsuit of racial discrimination and retaliation, saying they had been fired after complaining about racism at the firm's New York warehouse.
In a complaint filed Monday in the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of New York, six black workers alleged that white supervisors at the warehouse regularly used racial slurs and directed other insults at minorities who worked there. When the plaintiffs complained about their treatment, they were soon fired, leaving just two black workers employed at the New York office, the filing said.
“Rather than occurring sporadically, acts of vile racism occurred on a near-daily basis and were part and parcel to the culture of Momentum's [New York] operations,” Wigdor LLP attorneys Michael J. Willemin and Tanvir H. Rahman said in a statement announcing the lawsuit.
“As alleged in the complaint, Momentum treated its black employees as second-class citizens—it is time for Momentum to be held accountable for that,” they said.
Momentum on Monday denied any wrongdoing, saying that the claims asserted against the company had “no basis in law or fact.”
“The six disgruntled former hourly employees were terminated for legitimate, non-discriminatory reasons including unacceptable workplace behavior, fighting, poor performance, failure to show up for work and violations of material company policies and procedures,” Momentum said in a statement. “The company intends to vigorously defend all claims.”
The proposed class action lawsuit targeted one of the nation's fastest-growing clean energy companies, which last year received a $7.2 million tax credit from the state of New Jersey and more recently secured a $4.1 million investment from New Orleans-based venture capital firm Advantage Capital, according to the complaint.
The plaintiffs said that in addition to “racial hostility,” Momentum paid black workers less than their racial counterparts and often assigned black employees less desirable jobs than their white counterparts.
The complaint cited a recorded conversation in which Adam Murawski, a former foreman who managed the plaintiffs, admitted to plaintiff Garreth Murrell that he had used the N-word on multiple occasions. However, the filing alleged that neither Momentum nor the warehouse's head of operations, Jessica Adams, took any disciplinary action. Murrell said he was fired from the company the following day.
After the interaction, Murawski told his white colleagues, “can you believe he thought he could make a complaint against me,” the complaint said.
The filing also cited other incidents where foremen and white workers at the warehouse made racists comments and referred to crews that included black workers as the “nigga crew.”
“As a result of defendants' discriminatory and retaliatory conduct, there are now only two black employees out of the approximately 40 individuals who work out of the New York office as foremen and installer,” the complaint said. “None of the foremen are black.”
The filing also alleged violations of federal and state wage laws, including requiring employees to work off-the-clock and failing to reimburse workers for the costs of tools needed to perform their jobs.
According to the lawsuit, Murrell planned to file a charge of discrimination with the federal Equal Employment Opportunity Commission and would later amend the complaint to include violations of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act, which bars workplace discrimination on the basis of sex, race, color, national origin and religion.
The case, captioned Murrell v. Pro Custom Solar, has not yet been assigned to a judge.
An online docket-tracking service on Monday did not list counsel for Momentum.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllTrending Stories
- 1Amazon, SpaceX Press Constitutional Challenges to NLRB at 5th Circuit
- 2Schools Win Again: Social Media Fails to Strike Public Nuisance Claims
- 3Spencer Lawton, Savannah Prosecutor Who Tried ‘Midnight in the Garden’ Case, Dies at 81
- 4Uber Not Responsible for Turning Over Information on 'Dangerous Riders' to Competitor, Judge Finds
- 5Steve Bannon 'We Build The Wall' Fraud Trial Pushed to February 2025
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250