Bill Expanding Disclosure of Online Breaches Now Law
Now the requirement includes usernames, email addresses, and any passwords or security questions and answers that would permit access to an online account.
May 10, 2019 at 05:45 PM
4 minute read
Legislation expanding the types of personal data that will trigger a required notification to customers in case of a breach, including email addresses and passwords, was signed into law by Gov. Phil Murphy.
The online breach bill was among 22 measures that the governor signed on May 10.
With his signature, New Jersey joins California, Alaska, Iowa, South Carolina, Virginia and West Virginia with the new online standards to combat the growing menace of data breaches.
Existing law required businesses and public entities that compile digital information to notify consumers of breaches involving personal information, such as Social Security numbers, driver's license numbers, or credit and debit card information.
The new law amends those standards to include usernames, email addresses, and any passwords or security questions and answers that would permit access to an online account.
The legislation amends the Consumer Fraud Act. Penalties that apply to a willful, knowing and reckless violation of the notification requirements are: $10,000 for the first offense and $20,000 for the second and any subsequent offense; and treble damages in a civil suit.
Sen. Troy Singleton, D-Burlington, said it's intended to bolster consumers' rights to privacy and protection and instill a greater sense of security.
“With online databases and private account information being hacked so frequently now, consumers are more vulnerable to exposure and harm,” said Singleton, primary sponsor of S-52 in the Senate with Sen. Nia Gill, D-Essex, in a statement. “When a data breach occurs and sensitive or confidential protected data is accessed or disclosed without authorization, we have a right to know.”
The new law requires that breach alerts be provided to New Jersey resident consumers through written or electronic notice. If the business or entity demonstrates that the cost of providing notice would exceed $250,000, or that the number of affected consumers exceeds 500,000, or if the business or public entity does not have sufficient contact information, a substitute notice would include an email notice, a posting of the notice on the business or entity's website, as well as notification to major statewide media.
The bill's sponsors had companies with huge customer databases in mind when amending the current law after a year of high-profile data breaches. Breach victims included Marriott/Starwood Hotels, a subsidiary of Marriott International, whose data breach reportedly may have exposed personal information of up to 500 million guests. The hotel company said that an unauthorized party had four years of access to the Starwood guest reservation database, which contained guest information—including names, addresses, phone numbers, email addresses, passport numbers, date of birth, reservation dates, and credit and debit card information.
Other large companies such as Yahoo, Ebay, Equifax and Target have also been victims of data breaches in the past several years.
Under the new law, if breaches occur, consumers would have the opportunity to change their online account information quickly and monitor for potential identity theft, according to Assemblyman Ralph Caputo, D-Essex, who sponsored companion bill A-3245 in the Assembly with Assemblywoman Carol Murphy, D-Burlington.
“Protecting the security of online accounts is important for consumers, as a breach of security of these accounts can lead to the compromise of personal information and expose consumers to identity theft,” Caputo said in a May 10 statement.
The bill passed both chambers with relative ease after being introduced in early 2018. The full Senate approved it Jan. 31 by a 39-0-1 vote, and the Assembly passed it 76-0-0 on Feb. 25.
“Data breaches are an unfortunate effect of the technological age in which we live,” Assemblywoman Murphy said. “The reality is, many people give out their personal information when shopping or doing business online without a second thought.
“When those breaches inevitably occur, we have to make sure those potentially impacted have the chance to take steps to secure their information,” she said.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllNJ Attorney General's Office Announces Major Shake-Up for Executive Leadership Team
4 minute read'Bewitched by the Technology': $300K to Settle Faulty Facial Recognition
4 minute readTrending Stories
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250