Camden Jury Awards $1.75 Million in Auto Case
In McGlinchey v. Tran, a Camden County jury on April 24 awarded a $1.75 million verdict to a Runnemede man who was injured in a car accident in early…
May 10, 2019 at 01:00 PM
4 minute read
In McGlinchey v. Tran, a Camden County jury on April 24 awarded a $1.75 million verdict to a Runnemede man who was injured in a car accident in early 2015.
Plaintiff Brian McGlinchey, now 47, was driving a gray 2014 Acura ILX along West Clements Bridge Road in Runnemede when he was struck by defendant Thu H. Tran, a pharmacist from Mullica Hill, on Jan. 7, 2015, according to police reports. Tran, now 59, was operating a white 2012 Nissan Sentra on Highland Avenue, and according to police, struck McGlinchey's vehicle at approximately 2:28 p.m., after bypassing a stop sign at the intersection of West Clements Bridge Road and Highland Avenue.
Police reports noted that Tran disregarded the stop sign, leading to the collision with McGlinchey.
Prior to trial, Tran offered $18,000 to settle the case, according to court documents.,
According to the plaintiff's attorney, Lee D. Rosenfeld of the Cherry Hill office of Messa & Associates, Tran stipulated to liability at trial.
John Dingle, of the Law Offices of Pamela D. Hargrove in Moorestown, represented Tran. Dingle did not return a call for comment.
Rosenfeld said his client exercised what's known as a limitation-on-lawsuit option, a “verbal threshold” where a plaintiff must prove a permanent injury in order to make a recovery.
“My client successfully did that,” Rosenfeld said in a phone interview. “The jury determined that McGlinchey's injuries were permanent and caused by the accident.”
Among the injuries McGlinchey sustained was a permanent lumbar disc injury with nerve compression. He required no surgery but underwent several months of physical therapy, medication, two epidural injections and pain management treatment, according to Rosenfeld.
After a two-year hiatus, he said McGlinchey resumed treatment for his disc injury and pain in November 2018.
McGlinchney, an emergency room technician, missed two months of work after the 2015 accident, but returned to work despite experiencing ongoing pain, Rosenfeld said.
“The jury awarded damages to compensate him for the pain and suffering that he will continue to endure for the remainder of his life,” Rosenfeld said.
— Suzette Parmley
|$600K in Morris Med Mal Case
Pajewski v. Bissinger: A $600,000 settlement was paid on March 7 in a Morris County medical malpractice suit claiming that two obstetricians failed to treat fetal distress, resulting in a stillbirth.
According to an attorney in the case and electronic court documents, plaintiff Gabrielle Pajewski was treated by the doctors beginning in late 2014.
Pajewski ultimately miscarried and experienced a stillbirth on Feb. 23, 2015, according to the complaint, filed on Dec. 14, 2015. The suit named as defendants doctors Craig L. Bissinger and Malua Tambi.
The pregnancy was Pajewski's third, and she was 34 at the time, according to her lawyer, Steven Loewenthal of Nusbaum Stein Goldstein Bronstein & Kron in Succasunna.
Pajewski claimed the doctors negligently failed to refer Pajewski to a specialist for treatment of fetal anemia, evidenced by antibodies in the maternal bloodstream, Loewenthal said. She also claimed a similar but less serous condition experienced during her prior pregnancy should have led the doctors to make a referral to a specialist, according to Loewenthal.
The defendants in court filings denied negligence and contended that the action was time-barred.
Pajewski claimed that the fetus had an 80% chance of survival if treated with transfusions, but the defendants contended that the fetus had only a 20% chance of survival even if transfusions were performed, according to Loewenthal.
Pajewski claimed the experience caused psychological and emotional harm, leading to a 10-day inpatient psychiatric hospitalization, as well as treatment with psychotherapy and medication for a year and a half, Loewenthal said, noting that Pajewski's husband joined as a plaintiff but didn't undergo treatment.
The suit claimed emotional distress resulting from miscarriage under the New Jersey Supreme Court's 1988 decision in Giardina v. Bennett.
The parties settled on Feb. 22 via an order signed by Superior Court Judge W. Hunt Dumont.
The settlement, for $600,000, was paid March 7, Loewenthal said.
Counsel to Bissinger, Lauren O'Neill of MacNeill, O'Neill & Riveles in Cedar Grove, declined to comment.
Counsel to Tambi, Sam Rosenberg of Rosenberg Jacobs Heller & Fleming in Morris Plains, also declined to comment.
— David Gialanella
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllJudge Approves $667K Settlement Against Independence Blue Cross for Unpaid, Pre-Shift Computer Work
4 minute readTurning the Tables: Defense Litigators Embrace Lawsuits, Alleging Fraud at Plaintiffs Shops
6 minute readTitle Insurance Agency on Hot Seat Over Homebuyer Fees, Alleged Kickbacks
3 minute readTrending Stories
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250