Ex-Ocean County GOP Chair Gilmore Seeks to Undo Convictions
Convicted on charges of failing to remit payroll tax and making false statements on a loan application, Ocean County lawyer and politico George Gilmore has asked a federal judge to throw out the convictions or grant him a new trial.
May 14, 2019 at 03:06 PM
4 minute read
Convicted on charges of failing to remit payroll tax and making false statements on a loan application, Ocean County lawyer and power broker George Gilmore has asked a federal judge in New Jersey to throw out the convictions or grant him a new trial.
The former Ocean County Republican Organization chairman argued in court papers Monday that no rational jury could have found proof of guilt beyond a reasonable doubt on the charges that he failed to pay payroll taxes withheld from his law firm's employees or failed to disclose certain debts on an application for a $1.5 million residential mortgage with a $572,000 cash-out portion.
The motions come after Gilmore's April 17 conviction on two counts of failing to remit to the Internal Revenue Service payroll taxes collected from his firm's employees and one count of making false statements on an application for a loan from Ocean First Bank. Gilmore was acquitted on two counts of filing false tax returns and one count of tax evasion following a 2½-week trial before Senior Judge Anne Thompson of the U.S. District Court for the District of New Jersey in Trenton.
“Following the jury's mixed verdict in this case, George Gilmore has been presented to the world as a tax cheat and a bank fraudster. Although the jury unanimously rejected the government's core allegation—that Gilmore filed false tax returns by not characterizing his shareholder loans as income—its findings that he willfully failed to pay payroll taxes on two occasions in 2016 and lied to secure a home mortgage in 2015 have literally ruined his life,” Gilmore's posttrial filing states.
“In light of those verdicts, Gilmore was forced to withdraw from the law firm he has run for thirty-eight years, to surrender his law license despite an unblemished professional record of more than forty years, and to resign from a political position he held with distinction for 22 years. But George Gilmore did not willfully fail to pay his law firm's payroll taxes for two quarters in 2016, and he did not lie to Ocean First Bank to secure a mortgage in 2015,” said the motion, submitted by Kevin Marino of Marino, Tortorella & Boyle in Chatham on behalf of Gilmore.
According to his indictment, Gilmore filed federal income tax returns indicating he owed $493,526 for year 2013, $321,470 for 2014, and $311,287 for 2015. But authorities said Gilmore made no estimated tax payments and failed to pay the income taxes he owed. Meanwhile, from 2014 to 2016, Gilmore spent more than $2.5 million on personal expenses, including home remodeling costs, vacations and the acquisition of antiques, artwork and collectibles, according to the indictment. By the end of 2016, he owed the IRS $1.5 million in taxes, penalties and interest, the indictment charged.
In February, Marino said in court papers that he obtained an expert report finding that Gilmore met the criteria for hoarding disorder, as described in the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of the American Psychiatric Association.
After he was convicted, Gilmore resigned from his position as Ocean County Republican Organization chairman. He also resigned from his position as chair of the Ocean County Board of Elections after New Jersey Attorney General Gurbir Grewal said he would seek to force Gilmore to forfeit that position.
The two counts of failing to remit payroll taxes each carry a maximum penalty of five years in prison, and a $250,000 fine, or twice the gross gain or loss from the offense. The single count of loan application fraud carries a maximum penalty of 30 years in prison along with a $1 million fine.
Gilmore is scheduled to be sentenced on July 23.
Marino, the lawyer representing Gilmore, declined to comment on the posttrial motions.
A spokesman for the U.S. attorney's office also declined to comment.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View All'Sad That We Have to Do This': Senate Judiciary Passes Bill Temporarily Addressing Public Notice Crisis
3 minute readSenate Judiciary Committee OKs Retired Judge for New Role, Advances 6 Superior Court Nominees
4 minute readDispute Over Failure to Accommodate Disability Ends in $900K Settlement
3 minute readLowenstein Sandler Boosts White-Collar, Business Litigation Group With Deputy AG Hire
3 minute readTrending Stories
- 1New York State Bar Outlines 2025 Legislative Priorities, Aiming for Fairness, Equity
- 2Family of 'Cop City' Activist Killed by Ga. Troopers Files Federal Lawsuit
- 3Houston Appeals Court Split Over Race Discrimination Suit Involving COVID-19 Vaccine Distribution
- 4‘It's Your Funeral’: On Avoiding Damaging Your Client’s Case With Uncivil Behavior
- 5Business Immigration Practices Brace for ‘Dramatic’ Changes Under Second Trump Presidency
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250