'We're Going to Get Some Bigger Discounts Than We Get Now,' Teva's Top Lawyer Says of Convergence Push
CLO David Stark, based in Teva's U.S. headquarters in Parsippany, is looking for a few good firms to handle external legal spend at a significantly reduced cost—and not everyone is happy about it.
May 15, 2019 at 10:00 AM
5 minute read
The original version of this story was published on Corporate Counsel
Teva Pharmaceutical Industries chief legal officer David Stark is looking for a few good firms to handle more than $100 million in external legal spend at a significantly reduced cost—and not everyone is happy about it.
Stark, based in Teva's U.S. headquarters in Parsippany, is in the midst of whittling down the “hundreds” of outside firms Teva uses across litigation, regulatory and corporate work, looking to get as “close to one” firm as possible to handle about 80% of the firm's material legal spend. Trevor Faure, former global general counsel of Ernst & Young and the CEO of Smarter Law Solutions, is assisting Teva in the process.
As Teva looks to improve profitability generally, Stark is also looking at how his department can be more efficient. Stark and his team have sent out requests for proposals to 80 firms; some of which the company has worked with before and others it thinks can meet its new requirements that focus largely on firms with a global reach and diverse practice mix.
The main goal is to achieve significant discounts, though Stark wouldn't put a number on it. But he did offer a hint.
“It would be nice if all the firms we currently work with suddenly drop their rates by 30%,” Stark said, noting that would never happen on its own. “We're going to get some bigger discounts than we get now.”
Teva will continue to use firms for a portion of its work that is already being handled at a very low rate. And Stark says he hopes many of his current firms will be in the mix. But he also said the legal market is in the midst of an evolution and the “hungry” firms may win out. He just doesn't see the value in some of the rates he sees in the market.
“Growth rates of law firms are far exceeding the growth rates of the pharmaceutical industry,” Stark noted.
Stark isn't shy about saying this is focused on pure discounts. He said he is not interested in alternative fee arrangements.
“I've never been a big fan of alternative fee agreements,” Stark said. “We have very few. I'm a big fan of getting a reasonable rate for quality work.”
But the definition of reasonable is where things get tricky. Stark said some of his existing outside counsel are “not happy” and “don't like [the process] at all.” In fact, some have chosen not to participate. Others, particularly those with chief pricing officers or chief financial officers, understand this is where the world is headed, he said.
Once the proposal process is submitted the list will be shortened based on data and cost. Teva will then do qualitative research and interviews to get to a smaller panel of firms, all with the goal of having a final panel by the end of the year. Stark did not say how many firms he hopes to impanel, however, he would like to get as close to one firm if possible.
While oftentimes in-house leaders want their law firms to offer innovative technology Stark said “this isn't a big technology grab.” Teva, he said, would rather have the firms that are ultimately selected learn to interface with the technology Teva has in-house.
At the same time he is looking at convergence of outside counsel, Stark also isn't opposed to disaggregation of services. He said he has extracted the work he thinks deserves higher rates and uses vendors for other elements.
Not all law firms that work with Teva are on the chopping block. Stark said there are some smaller firms that do niche work at low rates and those firms will remain on the panel.
“It wouldn't be smart to move some work to another firm that is more of an unknown for the same or a greater cost,” Stark said. “We're not consolidating just for the sake of consolidating.”
This is not the first step Stark has taken to help Teva's bottom line. After Kåre Schultz took over as CEO in November 2017, the company went through a series of layoffs that resulted in 56,000 employees being laid off worldwide. The in-house legal department was not immune to those cuts. In 2018, Stark reduced the size of his legal department from 400 to 240 lawyers and staff.
Stark said on May 10 that he now has around 200 lawyers and staff working in the legal department.
ALM Editor-in-Chief of Legal Global Brands Gina Passarella contributed to this story.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllNJ Supreme Court Clarifies Affidavit of Merit Requirement for Doctor With Dual Specialties
4 minute readArbitrators Under Fire for Allegedly Forcing Workers to 'Stay or Pay' Employers
5 minute readTrending Stories
- 1New York-Based Skadden Team Joins White & Case Group in Mexico City for Citigroup Demerger
- 2No Two Wildfires Alike: Lawyers Take Different Legal Strategies in California
- 3Poop-Themed Dog Toy OK as Parody, but Still Tarnished Jack Daniel’s Brand, Court Says
- 4Meet the New President of NY's Association of Trial Court Jurists
- 5Lawyers' Phones Are Ringing: What Should Employers Do If ICE Raids Their Business?
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250