State's Federal Judge Shortage Deepens With Departure of Jose Linares
Linares' retirement creates a sixth vacancy on the court.
May 16, 2019 at 04:30 PM
4 minute read
Chief Judge Jose Linares of the District of New Jersey begins his retirement Friday, a departure that widens the state's already severe judicial shortage.
The loss of Linares brings the number of vacancies on the court's 17-seat bench to six. Meanwhile, after more than two years in the White House, President Donald Trump has yet to nominate a single district court judge in New Jersey.
The White House did nominate Paul Matey, a Lowenstein Sandler lawyer, to a New Jersey seat on the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit, and Matey was confirmed in March without the support of the state's two Democratic senators, Robert Menendez and Cory Booker. But the White House has not named any nominees for New Jersey's District Court since taking office in January 2017.
Linares, 65, is retiring after more than 16 years as a federal judge, and he served in the position of chief judge for the past two years. U.S. District Judge Freda Wolfson takes over as chief judge on Linares' departure.
Even before Linares' retirement, the District of New Jersey was deemed by the Administrative Office of U.S. Courts to be in a state of judicial emergency, with weighted filings of 903 cases per judgeship, the second highest in the nation, trailing only the Eastern District of Louisiana.
Two of the six vacant seats on New Jersey's court have been empty for more than four year—those created when Faith Hochberg retired and William Martini took senior status. One other seat has been vacant for two years after Jerome Simandle assumed senior status. Two vacancies were created in 2018 when Robert Kugler and Peter Sheridan assumed senior status.
Linares said he was proud of the performance of all the judges under difficult working conditions.
“Even with the dire shortage of judges we have, the number of decisions we put out, the number of civil filings and multidistrict litigation cases we have, with a criminal docket that's pretty high, they're doing a tremendous job,” Linares said.
He said the inability to fill the court's vacancies was “the most frustrating thing” happening during his time on the court. He met with Booker and Menendez, and with the White House counsel to discuss New Jersey's judge shortage, but “every time I think we were making inroads, it falls apart,” Linares said.
Booker is said to support the nomination of Julien Neals, the Bergen County counsel, who was nominated to a federal judgeship by President Barack Obama but whose nomination expired in early 2017. People familiar with the nomination process say that Neal's advancement would require the senators to strike a deal with the White House on a package of nominees, but no such agreement has emerged so far. The offices of Booker and Menendez did not respond to a request for comment.
Linares said he dealt with the staffing shortage by obtaining funding from the Administrative Office of U.S. Courts for the creation of two additional magistrate judge positions, which will be filled as soon as vetting of the candidates is complete, as well as additional staffing for the office that conducts research for prisoner litigation cases.
Other Democratic-leaning states such as New York and California have not been subject to the same dearth of judicial nominations that New Jersey has seen, said Carl Tobias, a professor at the University of Richmond School of Law in Virginia who studies federal judicial selection.
“It's hard to understand how they could go that long. It just puts a lot of pressure on the other judges,” Tobias said.
Under the Trump administration, major corporations in Texas put together a corporate lobbying effort to convince the White House and the home state's senators of the need to fill vacancies there, in order to provide prompt resolution of suits, said Tobias. The Texas effort was successful, and New Jersey's business community might find success with a similar strategy, he said.
“I can see the pharmaceutical companies leading the charge. Beyond that, I don't know what can be done,” he said.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllSocial Media Policy for Judges Provides Guidance in a Changing World
3 minute readBank of America's Cash Sweep Program Attracts New Legal Fire in Class Action
3 minute read'Something Really Bad Happened': J&J's Talc Bankruptcy Vote Under Attack
7 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Appellate Div. Follows Fed Reasoning on Recusal for Legislator-Turned-Judge
- 2SEC Obtained Record $8.2 Billion in Financial Remedies for Fiscal Year 2024, Commission Says
- 3Judiciary Law §487 in 2024
- 4Polsinelli's Revenue and Profits Surge Amid Partner De-Equitizations, Retirements
- 5Environmental Fines: Texas Secures Over $100M From Petrochemical Processor TPC Group
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250