Motley Rice Opens in NJ, Phila. With Lawyers from Berezofsky and Wilentz Firms
Three lawyers from Berezofsky Law Group and one from Wilentz, Goldman & Spitzer joined 90-lawyer Motley Rice.
May 24, 2019 at 10:00 AM
4 minute read
The original version of this story was published on The Legal Intelligencer
South Carolina-based plaintiffs firm Motley Rice has added offices in New Jersey and Philadelphia with new hires.
Litigators Esther Berezofsky, Michael Quirk and Daniel Lapinski have joined the firm as senior counsel in Philadelphia and Cherry Hill, and Sarah Hansel has joined as an associate.
Berezofsky formerly led Berezofsky Law Group, where Quirk was a partner and Hansel was an associate. She just launched the firm about 18 months ago, after splitting with her longtime partners, Gerald Williams and Mark Cuker, in September 2017.
Lapinski was at Woodbridge-based Wilentz, Goldman & Spitzer.
Motley Rice's new offices will operate out of the same space in Philadelphia and Cherry Hill that Berezofsky Law Group had used.
According to Motley Rice co-founder Joe Rice, Berezofsky has been a co-counsel to the firm for many years.
“She was in a position to handle some good litigation, some good causes, but needed some depth,” Rice said.
Neither Berezofsky's practice nor Motley Rice's existing practice will change much, he added, other than providing more resources for cases that Berezofsky is bringing over in which she hadn't already been partnering with Motley Rice.
“This was really borne of the relationships that have developed in the work we have done together,” Berezofsky said. “It really flowed from working together increasingly, working together more on various litigation.”
Berezofsky handles environmental, toxic tort and products liability work. She is currently on the plaintiffs' executive committee for the proposed class in litigation over Flint, Michigan's water crisis, and she is litigating similar cases in Fresno, California.
In addition to those kinds of cases, she also litigates medical drug and device suits. Before she was a practicing lawyer, she was a clinical psychologist who consulted law firms on post-traumatic stress disorder and community trauma, as it relates to chemical disasters.
While her move became official in April, the firm just announced its new office this week.
As the firm was in talks with Berezofsky, it was also courting Lapinski.
Lapinski's move was not coordinated with Berezofsky's, she said, but they have known each other for two decades and worked on litigation together previously. Berezofsky said she and Lapinski actually talked about joining forces about 12 years ago. “Having him join felt like a natural fit as well,” she said.
Lapinski's practice includes pharmaceutical and medical device litigation, and he is currently a member of the plaintiffs' steering committee in the Johnson & Johnson talcum powder multidistrict litigation and the Proton Pump Inhibitor MDL, according to Motley Rice.
With over 90 lawyers, Motley Rice is large by plaintiffs firm standards. It also has offices in Washington, D.C., New York, Missouri, Rhode Island and West Virginia.
Rice said Philadelphia is easy to get to, and fits well within the firm's existing East Coast footprint.
“It's an area that MDLs look to. The courts are sophisticated, they understand mass torts practice, they understand environmental practice. It just seemed like a good place to go,” he said.
But whether Motley Rice hires more lawyers in the Philadelphia area depends on how the practice goes, he said. The firm has lawyers in New York and Rhode Island who can get to Philadelphia pretty quickly, he noted, but “if we need people physically there, we'll add people physically there.”
Berezofsky's role in the Flint litigation and the split of her former firm were at the center of a case last year brought by her former partner, Cuker. But an arbitrator ruled in Berezofsky's favor that she was not obligated by a dissolution agreement to include Cuker in the Flint litigation, and a federal judge affirmed that decision in February.
Wilentz Goldman, in an emailed statement on Lapinski's departure, said: “Dan is an accomplished lawyer who served for years as a valued member of our leading mass tort and class action team. We wish him the best.”
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllChiesa Shahinian Bolsters Corporate Practice With 5 From Newark Boutique
4 minute read$113K Sanction Award to Law Firm at Stake: NJ Supreme Court Will Consider 'Unsettled Law' Frivolous Litigation Question
4 minute readWhich Outside Law Firms Are Irreplaceable, and Which Should Have Gotten the Ax Years Ago?
4 minute readLargest Law Firms: New Jersey and Firmwide Attorney Count
Trending Stories
- 1Judge Grants Special Counsel's Motion, Dismisses Criminal Case Against Trump Without Prejudice
- 2GEICO, Travelers to Pay NY $11.3M for Cybersecurity Breaches
- 3'Professional Misconduct': Maryland Supreme Court Disbars 86-Year-Old Attorney
- 4Capital Markets Partners Expect IPO Resurgence During Trump Administration
- 5Chief Assistant District Attorney and Litigator Shortlisted for Paulding County Judgeship
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250