Budd Larner Expected to Close This Summer, Sources Say
While the firm had as many as 75 attorneys about four years ago, Budd Larner's head count has dwindled to about 31 lawyers on its website today.
May 28, 2019 at 03:59 PM
4 minute read
Rocked by significant shareholder defections, Budd Larner is expected to close this summer, according to six people close to the prominent New Jersey law firm.
The Short Hills-based firm has made no public announcement of the closing plans. Firm leaders stated last month that they were "evaluating next steps for the firm."
The firm's remaining executive committee members, Susan Reach Winters and Peter Frazza, did not return messages seeking comment last week and Tuesday. The firm's chief operating officer, Mitchell Rait, declined to comment May 22 and did not return subsequent email messages.
Budd Larner, now in its 85th year, had as many as 75 lawyers about four years ago. But in recent years, the firm's head count has dwindled and it has seen several rainmakers exit just in the last year. The firm currently lists 31 lawyers on its website and offices in four locations: Short Hills and Cherry Hill, New Jersey, as well as New York and Philadelphia.
Just last month, the firm lost at least 18 lawyers, including two members of its executive committee, to other firms.
The recent exits include executive committee member Andrew Miller, who led a group of 15 intellectual property lawyers to the Madison office of Windels Marx Lane & Mittendorf, and another executive committee member, James Fitzsimmons, who joined Drinker Biddle & Reath.
After those exits, Frazza and Winters said in a statement that they were "evaluating next steps for the firm."
The sources who told ALM about the firm's closing plans all spoke on condition of anonymity as they were not authorized to discuss it. The exact timing of the closing is unclear, but all sources pointed to this summer.
Shareholder exits haven't been Budd Larner's only problems in the last year. Its former chief technology officer, Rocco Romeo, was charged by federal prosecutors in late January for allegedly seeking to defraud the firm. Manhattan federal prosecutors allege Romeo and a co-defendant, Jacqueline Galler, created a shell company to bill nearly $900,000 of expenses to Romeo's employer using false charges and invoices over three years.
Prosecutors say the two used the funds to pay personal expenses. Romeo and Galler were charged with four criminal counts, including wire fraud and money laundering-related charges.
(A judge on May 29 dismissed the charges against Galler without prejudice.)
Shortly after Romeo was arrested, Budd Larner filed a civil RICO lawsuit against Romeo and Galler. "The firm suffered significant financial losses as a result of defendants' ongoing pattern of theft, unlawful receipt and conversion of the firm's money," Budd Larner said in its Feb. 25 lawsuit, claiming losses of at least $902,147. (Galler has filed a cross-claim against Romeo in that case, alleging the alleged transactions were performed by Romeo without her knowledge or consent.)
Budd Larner's attorneys in the RICO case, shareholder Philip Clarke Chronakis and associate Adam Hoffman, did not respond to a message seeking comment on Romeo or the firm's closing plans.
Romeo's defense attorney, Jason Ser, of Federal Defenders of New York, did not respond to a request for comment. Galler's attorneys, Benjamin Ostrer and David Darwin of Ostrer & Associates, also did not respond to a message.
The firm that would become known simply as Budd Larner in recent years started in 1934 as a small firm in Newark and grew to roughly 110 lawyers in the 1980s, though its head count would fluctuate over the years with rounds of defections and new hires.
The firm transformed from an insurance defense firm to one offering a range of services, and came to be fueled by a national mass toxic tort litigation practice. Budd Larner became known for its involvement representing plaintiffs in the 1980s and 1990s in civil litigation against tobacco companies over their products' link to cancer in users.
Editor's Note: This article has been updated to reflect that a judge dismissed the charges against Jacqueline Galler on May 29, 2019, a day after this article was published.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View All'I've Worked Until 2 in the Morning': Lawyers Brace for Trump Policy
6 minute readGOP Trifecta in Washington Could Put Litigation Finance Industry Under Pressure
Lowenstein Hires Ex-FTX US General Counsel Ryne Miller to Lead Its Commodities, Derivatives Practice
3 minute readMany Lawyers Are Reeling From Election Results, but Leaders Are Staying Mum
6 minute readTrending Stories
- 1US Magistrate Judge Embry Kidd Confirmed to 11th Circuit
- 2Shaq Signs $11 Million Settlement to Resolve Astrals Investor Claims
- 3McCormick Consolidates Two Tesla Chancery Cases
- 4Amazon, SpaceX Press Constitutional Challenges to NLRB at 5th Circuit
- 5Schools Win Again: Social Media Fails to Strike Public Nuisance Claims
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250