Prosecutors Want to Use Crime-Fraud Exception to Compel Bloomfield Attorney's Testimony
The Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers is seeking to join the case as an amicus curiae after a defense attorney was subpoenaed to testify against a former client.
May 28, 2019 at 05:07 PM
4 minute read
The defense bar is fighting a move by the Bergen County Prosecutor's Office to compel a criminal defense lawyer to testify against his former client.
The prosecutor's office has served a subpoena on Landry Belizaire, an attorney in Bloomfield, over his representation of Roydell Cameron on sexual assault charges. The prosecutor's office claims the crime-fraud exception permits it to pierce the attorney-client privilege. But a lawyer representing Belizaire says the breach of attorney-client privilege is unwarranted. The Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers is seeking to join the case as an amicus curiae.
Belizaire made arrangements for his client to turn himself in to the prosecutor in connection with the sexual assault, but Cameron, of Bronx, New York, did not appear at the scheduled time. Cameron was apprehended at John F. Kennedy Airport on March 29 as he was about to board a flight to Jamaica. Cameron, 40, was charged with two counts of aggravated sexual assault, possession of a weapon for an unlawful purpose, unlawful possession of a weapon, and making terroristic threats. The arrest stems from the sexual assault of a woman at gunpoint in Palisades Park in April 2005.
The prosecutor's office served Belizaire with a subpoena duces tecum for documents, including all communications with his client, and any third parties concerning the voluntary surrender. The subpoena also seeks to compel Belizaire to testify against his client before a grand jury.
When Belizaire sought to invoke attorney-client privilege, the prosecutor told him the crime-fraud exception applies.
Belizaire is represented by Raymond Brown of Scarinci Hollenbeck in Lyndhurst. Brown called efforts to compel Belizaire's testimony “overreaching.”
Belizaire, now conflicted out of representing Cameron, withdrew from the case. Hackensack attorney Brian Neary now represents Cameron.
Lawyers in the case were scheduled to hold a conference call with Superior Court Judge Margaret Foti of Bergen County on Tuesday to set a briefing schedule.
Belizaire “was placed in an unenviable position by a prosecutor with a reputation for overreaching,” said John Azzarello, president of the Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers of New Jersey, in a May 23 email to members of that group. The subpoena was issued by Assistant Prosecutor Danielle Grootenboer, and its issuance was approved by Dennis Calo, Azzarello said in that email.
Calo served as acting prosecutor until May 21, when Mark Musella was sworn in. The ACDL agreed to serve as amicus because prosecutors' attempts to pierce attorney-client privilege represent a “very important and seemingly recurring issue,” Azzarello said in the email.
Grootenboer has made clear that she believes Belizaire was not complicit in Cameron's attempt to flee, but the state believes Cameron used Belizaire without his knowledge to stall the date and time for surrender, Azzarello said in the email.
In 2018, the Bergen County Prosecutor's Office lost its bid to breach attorney-client privilege in a civil suit accusing it of blowing the cover of a confidential informant. The prosecutor's office sought to compel testimony of Robert Tandy, a lawyer representing a detective who induced Frank Lagano to become an informant. After Lagano was shot and killed in 2007 outside an East Brunswick diner he owned, in a crime that remains unsolved, his estate sued the prosecutor's office.
In that case, the Bergen County Prosecutor's Office claimed Tandy waived his attorney-client privilege when his client filed a suit against the attorney general raising allegations similar to the ones in the Lagano case. But U.S. Magistrate Judge Cathy Waldor rejected the office's argument, saying that no court “has construed the filing of a complaint as a blanket waiver for all communications between an attorney and his or her client.”
A spokeswoman for the Bergen County Prosecutor's Office, Maureen Parenta, declined to answer questions about its subpoena of Belizaire because it is an open matter.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllSo Who Won? Congestion Pricing Ruling Leaves Both Sides Claiming Victory, Attorneys Seeking Clarification
4 minute readA Year of Controversy: NJ Judges Face Disciplinary and Legal Issues With Mixed Results in 2024
4 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Judicial Conference Declines Democratic Request to Refer Justice Thomas to DOJ
- 2People in the News—Jan. 2, 2025—Eastburn and Gray, Klehr Harrison
- 3Deal Watch: Latham, Paul Weiss, Debevoise Land on Year-End Big Deals. Plus, Mixed Messages for 2025 M&A
- 4Bathroom Recording Leads to Lawyer's Disbarment: Disciplinary Roundup
- 5Conn. Supreme Court: Workers' Comp Insurance Cancellations Must Be Unambiguous
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250