Struck Pedestrian Settles With Liquor Store For $1 Million in Union County
A man who suffered a traumatic brain injury after he was hit by a car agreed to a $1 million settlement in his Union County suit, Tene-Garcia v. A…
May 31, 2019 at 11:20 AM
5 minute read
A man who suffered a traumatic brain injury after he was hit by a car agreed to a $1 million settlement in his Union County suit, Tene-Garcia v. A and H Liquors, on April 29.
Ciriano Tene-Garcia was walking on a sidewalk outside Aarti's Liquors in Union on Jan. 25, 2015, when snow and ice caused him to slip. He fell into Vauxhall Road, where he was hit by a vehicle, according to plaintiff lawyer Michael Gallardo of Ginarte, Gallardo, Gonzalez & Winograd in Newark.
Tene-Garcia underwent brain surgery after the accident but was left with significant deficits in concentration and memory that are permanent in nature, he claimed. He also underwent surgery to his right knee, and he has a cosmetic injury to the leg and some difficulty walking. Tene-Garcia also experiences pain in his leg that is expected to be permanent, said Gallardo.
Tene-Garcia claimed in his suit that the liquor store negligently failed to clear snow and ice from the sidewalk, causing him to slip on the ice and fall into the roadway. An investigating police officer gave testimony corroborating Tene-Garcia's claim that the sidewalk was covered with snow and ice, Gallardo noted.
Tene-Garcia sued the property owner but opted not to sue the motorist who struck him because the motorist lacked liability insurance, said Gallardo. The liquor store owner added the driver, Steven Intriago, but he was later dismissed from the case on summary judgment, Gallardo said.
Tene-Garcia testified in discovery that he was struck by two vehicles, contradicting testimony he gave in interrogatories that he was hit by one vehicle, according to Gallardo, who said the inconsistency in his testimony was attributable to a cognitive deficit that was caused by head trauma.
The liquor store agreed to settle for $1 million on the first day of trial in Union County Superior Court.
Gallardo represented the plaintiff along with Robert Baumgarten of his firm.
The liquor store was represented by Adam Kipnis of Braff, Harris, Sukoneck & Maloof in Livingston. He did not return a call about the case.
— Charles Toutant
|$900K in Middlesex Auto Case
Fino v. Plante: Plaintiff Thomas Fino received the proceeds of a $900,000 settlement on May 23 for injuries he sustained in a motor vehicle accident that occurred in Old Bridge.
The Middlesex County case was settled just prior to a trial date of May 13.
Fino, of Morganville, was stopped in traffic while driving a 2015 black Chevrolet Silverado east on Spring Valley Road in Old Bridge, when he was rear-ended by a black 2015 Jeep Wrangler operated by Ryan Plante of Morganville on Oct. 14, 2016, according to the police report.
Evan Rosen of Litvak & Trifiolis in Hanover represented Plante. He did not return a call.
Plante was issued a summons for careless driving for hitting Fino's Silverado at approximately 4:42 p.m. that afternoon, according to the police report.
At the time of the accident, Fino was receiving regular chiropractic treatment for cervical and lumbar complaints, according to his attorney, Geoffrey C. Arlen of the Arlen Law Firm in Hillsborough.
Despite the treatments, Fino was able to participate in all of his normal daily activities, according to Arlen. But emanating from the accident, Fino experienced pain and weakness up and down his right arm that eventually necessitated anterior cervical discectomy and fusion, Arlen said.
The surgery was performed on March 3, 2017, and Fino progressed well afterwards, Arlen said.
However, nearly nine months later, on Christmas Eve 2017, Fino attempted to lift a 60-pound box and felt immediate pain in his neck and left shoulder, said Arlen. He said Fino subsequently underwent a posterior decompression on May 7, 2018.
Arlen said Fino continues to suffer pain from the accident.
“Mr. Fino has made a very good recovery considering the two surgeries he had to undergo,” Arlen said in an email. “Mr. Fino and myself are extremely pleased with the settlement amount. Mr. Fino will continue to receive basically the same type of chiropractic treatment he was receiving before the accident, with a few modifications for the surgeries.”
Fino's neurosurgical expert, Dr. Sanford Fineman of Somerset, opined that Fino suffered an aggravation of preexisting spondylosis with compression at multiple levels of his cervical and thoracic spine.
Plante's medical expert, Andrew M. Hutter of The Center for Orthopaedics in West Orange, opined that Fino's symptoms and findings were preexisting and not caused by the 2016 car accident.
Arlen said Fino runs a salvage company and has made a full return to work with some physical limitations.
— Suzette Parmley
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllJudge Approves $667K Settlement Against Independence Blue Cross for Unpaid, Pre-Shift Computer Work
4 minute readTurning the Tables: Defense Litigators Embrace Lawsuits, Alleging Fraud at Plaintiffs Shops
6 minute readTitle Insurance Agency on Hot Seat Over Homebuyer Fees, Alleged Kickbacks
3 minute readTrending Stories
- 1The Year That Was
- 2Employment Law Changes Expected From Second Trump Administration
- 3Decision of the Day: Sri Lanka Granted Stay of Litigation Over Defaulted Sovereign Bond Debt
- 4AI Adoption, Data Center Building Boom Opening More Doors for Cybercriminals, Many of Them Teenagers
- 5Mayor's Advisory Committee To Hold Hearing on Fitness of Judicial Candidates
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250