BAR REPORT - Students learn more than the law through mock trial competitions
Scores of fourth- and fifth-graders participated in mock trials at the New Jersey Law Center
June 03, 2019 at 04:58 PM
4 minute read
It was a case about a five-year-old boy who was bitten by a snake in a pet shop. His family said the pet shop was responsible and should pay for medical expenses. The pet shop owner disagreed.
The plaintiff's attorney was sitting across from the 18-year-old pet shop employee on the witness stand, when his cross-examination turned aggressive.
“Your employer gave you permission to talk on your cell phone while you were working?” the attorney asked.
“Well, it wasn't a whole conversation. I just needed to…”
The attorney interrupted:
“So when you should have been locking the cage of a snake, your back was turned and you were on your phone and it resulted in Mikey Fingers being bit.”
“It wasn't like that…” the witness stammered.
“No further questions, your honor.”
The judge paused, looked up and said with a broad smile, “You're kind of crisp, aren't you?”
The courtroom erupted in giggles.
It was just one of many moments of levity on a recent morning for scores of fourth- and fifth-graders participating in mock trials at the New Jersey Law Center in New Brunswick. The trials, original cases written and acted out by the students, were among two of the winners in the New Jersey State Bar Foundation's (NJSBF's) 19th annual Law Fair Competition, which is open to third- through sixth-graders throughout the state.
Law Fair is part of the foundation's legal education program, and includes the Law Adventure Competition, for seventh- and eighth-graders; and the Vincent J. Apruzzese High School Mock Trial Competition. This year's winner of the high school competition, Colts Neck High School, represented New Jersey in the National High School Mock Trial Championship in Athens, Ga. last month.
Following the rules and format described on the NJSBF website, students participating in the competitions must write original mock trial cases. They are judged on their originality and educational value in teaching students about the law. Law Adventure mock trials must also incorporate one of the two themes offered, which this year were plagiarism and cybercrime.
The winning cases from this year's Law Fair and Law Adventure programs were performed before a student audience the last two weeks of May at the Law Center.
On a recent morning, excited chatter filled the lobby of the Law Center as busloads of elementary school students entered to watch teams from Demarest Elementary School in Bloomfield present two mock trials and to serve as the jury. The fourth-graders won first place for their snake bite case and the fifth-graders won honorable mention for a case about a drone.
William G. Brigiani, an attorney and former NJSBF trustee, acted as judge. Sporting a burgundy Harry Potter scarf and a neatly pinched handlebar mustache that granted him a wizened look, Brigiani occasionally paused to explain a legal term or procedure, often with humor and a light touch.
“Do you mind if I comment?” he asked after the plaintiff's attorney cut off the pet store employee's testimony.
“If it's your witness, you don't want that because the jury is losing information. So you would object to counsel interrupting,” Brigiani said.
Kelly Fallows, a Maurice River Township Elementary School teacher, brought her fourth-grade class to watch the mock trials. The class entered the competition for the first time this year, and several had already asked the principal if they could start a debate team and said they wanted to become lawyers.
“They learned a lot about the difference between civil and criminal cases and about debating,” Fallows said.
“I learned a lot, too,” she said.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllAppellate Div. Follows Fed Reasoning on Recusal for Legislator-Turned-Judge
4 minute readChiesa Shahinian Bolsters Corporate Practice With 5 From Newark Boutique
5 minute read'A Mockery' of Deposition Rules: Walgreens Wins Sanctions Dispute Over Corporate Witness Allegedly Unfamiliar With Company
Trending Stories
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250