A federal judge in Newark has dismissed a suit by three divorced fathers who claim that case law, court rules and statutes concerning child custody in New Jersey fail to provide sufficient protection of their rights in family court proceedings.

The state court judges who are named as defendants in the suit are not proper defendants, and some of the constitutional claims made in the suit are duplicative of claims raised in previous lawsuits, U.S. District Judge Kevin McNulty said in his decision dismissing the suit. Furthermore, the relief being sought, including a request for an injunction against “refusing to provide parents with adequate notice and a meaningful hearing at a meaningful time following the removal of children from their homes” is vague and unworkable, McNulty ruled.

This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.

To view this content, please continue to their sites.

Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Why am I seeing this?

LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.

For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]